The Differences in Necessary Competencies, Skills, and Performance Abilities Among Thai Board-Certified Occupational Medicine Physicians and Basic Occupational Medicine Certified Physicians.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare Pub Date : 2025-03-08 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JMDH.S509530
Pachara Sasanawin, Vithawat Surawattanasakul, Shewarat Prasan, Kitipong Banomyong
{"title":"The Differences in Necessary Competencies, Skills, and Performance Abilities Among Thai Board-Certified Occupational Medicine Physicians and Basic Occupational Medicine Certified Physicians.","authors":"Pachara Sasanawin, Vithawat Surawattanasakul, Shewarat Prasan, Kitipong Banomyong","doi":"10.2147/JMDH.S509530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Occupational physicians in Thailand are classified into two groups: Thai board-certified occupational medicine physicians (TBOMPs) and Basic occupational medicine certified physician (BOMCPs). Variations in training duration result in differences in professional competencies. Although national regulations allow both groups to perform similar duties, disparities in training have raised concerns regarding competency, necessitating further investigation.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore the necessary competencies, skills, and abilities to perform in occupational medicine in TBOMPs and BOMCPs.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>An analytic cross-sectional survey was conducted using an anonymous online questionnaire distributed via the Redcap platform to TBOMPs end BOMCPs across institutions. The questionnaire was developed based on several standardized sources of core competencies, is divided into three sections, which include: demographic and working conditions, necessary competencies and skills, and abilities to perform in occupational medicine.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 216 respondents participated in the study, comprising 58 TBOMPs and 158 BOMCPs. The TBOMPs had a slightly higher proportion of males than the BOMCPs (67.2% vs 53.2%) and a marginally lower mean age (34.84 ± 8.59 vs 37.67 ± 8.69 years). As regards necessary competencies, TBOMPs significantly rated four areas higher than BOMCPs which include diagnosis of work-related diseases (4.57 vs 4.43, p = 0.032), ergonomics (4.38 vs 4.10, p = 0.005), medical surveillance and prevention (4.63 vs 4.48, p = 0.034), and communication skills (4.81 vs 4.57, p = 0.001). Additionally, as regards the abilities to perform, TBOMPs rated all areas higher than BOMCPs except for diagnosing work-related diseases (93.1% vs 81.7%, p = 0.053), and leadership and teamwork (91.4% vs 87.3%, p = 0.481).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HRM, communication, teamwork, and leadership are essential competencies and skills. Enhancing training in environmental medicine, revising research methodology instruction, and introducing refresher training sessions in the The Residency Training Program of Occupational Medicine (ROM) and Basic occupational medicine (BOM) curricula are recommended to improve professional practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":16357,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","volume":"18 ","pages":"1423-1432"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11899935/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S509530","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Occupational physicians in Thailand are classified into two groups: Thai board-certified occupational medicine physicians (TBOMPs) and Basic occupational medicine certified physician (BOMCPs). Variations in training duration result in differences in professional competencies. Although national regulations allow both groups to perform similar duties, disparities in training have raised concerns regarding competency, necessitating further investigation.

Purpose: To explore the necessary competencies, skills, and abilities to perform in occupational medicine in TBOMPs and BOMCPs.

Patients and methods: An analytic cross-sectional survey was conducted using an anonymous online questionnaire distributed via the Redcap platform to TBOMPs end BOMCPs across institutions. The questionnaire was developed based on several standardized sources of core competencies, is divided into three sections, which include: demographic and working conditions, necessary competencies and skills, and abilities to perform in occupational medicine.

Results: A total of 216 respondents participated in the study, comprising 58 TBOMPs and 158 BOMCPs. The TBOMPs had a slightly higher proportion of males than the BOMCPs (67.2% vs 53.2%) and a marginally lower mean age (34.84 ± 8.59 vs 37.67 ± 8.69 years). As regards necessary competencies, TBOMPs significantly rated four areas higher than BOMCPs which include diagnosis of work-related diseases (4.57 vs 4.43, p = 0.032), ergonomics (4.38 vs 4.10, p = 0.005), medical surveillance and prevention (4.63 vs 4.48, p = 0.034), and communication skills (4.81 vs 4.57, p = 0.001). Additionally, as regards the abilities to perform, TBOMPs rated all areas higher than BOMCPs except for diagnosing work-related diseases (93.1% vs 81.7%, p = 0.053), and leadership and teamwork (91.4% vs 87.3%, p = 0.481).

Conclusion: HRM, communication, teamwork, and leadership are essential competencies and skills. Enhancing training in environmental medicine, revising research methodology instruction, and introducing refresher training sessions in the The Residency Training Program of Occupational Medicine (ROM) and Basic occupational medicine (BOM) curricula are recommended to improve professional practice.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.00%
发文量
287
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare (JMDH) aims to represent and publish research in healthcare areas delivered by practitioners of different disciplines. This includes studies and reviews conducted by multidisciplinary teams as well as research which evaluates or reports the results or conduct of such teams or healthcare processes in general. The journal covers a very wide range of areas and we welcome submissions from practitioners at all levels and from all over the world. Good healthcare is not bounded by person, place or time and the journal aims to reflect this. The JMDH is published as an open-access journal to allow this wide range of practical, patient relevant research to be immediately available to practitioners who can access and use it immediately upon publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信