Prevalence and Factors with Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing among Older Surgical Outpatients in China: A Nationwide Cross-sectional Study in 100 Hospitals.

IF 3.8 4区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Fangyuan Tian, Zhaoyan Chen, Jinyuan Zhang, Ying Zhang, Qiyi Feng
{"title":"Prevalence and Factors with Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing among Older Surgical Outpatients in China: A Nationwide Cross-sectional Study in 100 Hospitals.","authors":"Fangyuan Tian, Zhaoyan Chen, Jinyuan Zhang, Ying Zhang, Qiyi Feng","doi":"10.1007/s44197-025-00378-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Older outpatients face a heightened risk of potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP). However, there is a paucity of evidence evaluating PIP in older outpatients attending surgical outpatient departments in China using Chinese-specific criteria. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of PIP and identify associated factors within this population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional design was employed, utilizing prescription data from older surgical outpatients across 100 hospitals in seven Chinese cities between January and December 2021. PIP was assessed based on Chinese criteria, and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors. Trends were analyzed using the average annual percent change (AAPC) via joinpoint regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 357,135 prescriptions for older surgical outpatients were analyzed. The prevalence of PIP according to Chinese criteria was 13.06%. The five most commonly identified potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) were doxazosin, clopidogrel, tolterodine, estazolam, and the concurrent use of more than two NSAIDs, which together accounted for 52.73% of all PIMs. From January to December, the prevalence of PIP exhibited a slight decrease, from 13.29 to 13.21% (AAPC: -0.278%). Logistic regression revealed that factors such as tertiary-level hospital status, polypharmacy, pain, sleep disorders, hypertension, benign prostatic hyperplasia, and stone disease were positively associated with PIP in older surgical outpatients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study found that while the prevalence of PIP among older surgical outpatients in China is relatively low, attention is needed to the widespread use of certain PIMs.</p>","PeriodicalId":15796,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Epidemiology and Global Health","volume":"15 1","pages":"39"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11903986/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Epidemiology and Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s44197-025-00378-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Older outpatients face a heightened risk of potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP). However, there is a paucity of evidence evaluating PIP in older outpatients attending surgical outpatient departments in China using Chinese-specific criteria. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of PIP and identify associated factors within this population.

Methods: A cross-sectional design was employed, utilizing prescription data from older surgical outpatients across 100 hospitals in seven Chinese cities between January and December 2021. PIP was assessed based on Chinese criteria, and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors. Trends were analyzed using the average annual percent change (AAPC) via joinpoint regression.

Results: A total of 357,135 prescriptions for older surgical outpatients were analyzed. The prevalence of PIP according to Chinese criteria was 13.06%. The five most commonly identified potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) were doxazosin, clopidogrel, tolterodine, estazolam, and the concurrent use of more than two NSAIDs, which together accounted for 52.73% of all PIMs. From January to December, the prevalence of PIP exhibited a slight decrease, from 13.29 to 13.21% (AAPC: -0.278%). Logistic regression revealed that factors such as tertiary-level hospital status, polypharmacy, pain, sleep disorders, hypertension, benign prostatic hyperplasia, and stone disease were positively associated with PIP in older surgical outpatients.

Conclusions: The study found that while the prevalence of PIP among older surgical outpatients in China is relatively low, attention is needed to the widespread use of certain PIMs.

中国老年外科门诊患者的患病率及潜在处方不当因素:一项全国100家医院的横断面研究
背景:老年门诊患者面临潜在不适当处方(PIP)的高风险。然而,在中国,使用中国特定标准评估外科门诊老年患者的PIP缺乏证据。本研究旨在评估该人群中PIP的患病率并确定相关因素。方法:采用横断面设计,利用2021年1月至12月中国7个城市100家医院老年外科门诊患者的处方数据。根据中国标准评估PIP,并进行多因素logistic回归分析以确定危险因素。趋势分析使用平均年变化百分比(AAPC)通过连接点回归。结果:共分析老年外科门诊患者处方357135张。中国标准PIP患病率为13.06%。最常见的5种潜在不适当药物(PIMs)是多沙唑嗪、氯吡格雷、托特罗定、艾司唑仑和同时使用2种以上非甾体抗炎药,共占所有PIMs的52.73%。1 - 12月,PIP患病率略有下降,从13.29%降至13.21% (AAPC: -0.278%)。Logistic回归分析显示,三级医院、多药、疼痛、睡眠障碍、高血压、良性前列腺增生、结石疾病等因素与老年外科门诊患者PIP呈正相关。结论:研究发现,虽然中国老年外科门诊患者PIP患病率相对较低,但需要注意某些pim的广泛使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
1.40%
发文量
57
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Epidemiology and Global Health is an esteemed international publication, offering a platform for peer-reviewed articles that drive advancements in global epidemiology and international health. Our mission is to shape global health policy by showcasing cutting-edge scholarship and innovative strategies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信