The efficacy of penoscrotal decompression for refractory ischaemic priapism: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Mohamed Mubarak, Qasim Isa, John Hayes, Ian Pearce, Vaibhav Modgil
{"title":"The efficacy of penoscrotal decompression for refractory ischaemic priapism: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Mohamed Mubarak, Qasim Isa, John Hayes, Ian Pearce, Vaibhav Modgil","doi":"10.1038/s41443-025-01044-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Penoscrotal decompression (PSD) has emerged as a promising surgical intervention for refractory ischaemic priapism, involving proximal corporotomies and the drainage of ischaemic blood. Initial outcomes have shown high success rates in achieving detumescence, low recurrence rates, and relatively good preservation of erectile function. This meta-analysis aims to comprehensively evaluate PSD's effectiveness across three key metrics: detumescence, prevention of recurrence, and erectile function preservation. A systematic review and meta-analysis, following PRISMA guidelines, identified 9 publications that met the inclusion criteria. They encompassed five case reports, two abstracts, and two observational cohort studies, with data on 62 patients who presented with refractory ischaemic priapism. Notably, around half (46.7%) of the patients had conventional distal shunts prior to PSD. Overall following PSD, detumescence was achieved in 89.3% (CI 95%, 0.78-0.95). Post-PSD recurrence of ischaemic priapism occurred in 12.7% (95% CI, 0.06-0.24). Erectile function was preserved in 54.8% of the patients who had follow-up (95% CI, 0.40-0.68). These findings inform us that PSD proves to be a viable and effective surgical option for refractory ischaemic priapism with a key feature being better sexual function preservation outcomes compared to shunting procedures. Given the paucity of data, further larger scale prospective studies of robust designs are still necessary to better establish PSD's role within the treatment algorithm for refractory ischaemic priapism.</p>","PeriodicalId":14068,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Impotence Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Impotence Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-025-01044-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Penoscrotal decompression (PSD) has emerged as a promising surgical intervention for refractory ischaemic priapism, involving proximal corporotomies and the drainage of ischaemic blood. Initial outcomes have shown high success rates in achieving detumescence, low recurrence rates, and relatively good preservation of erectile function. This meta-analysis aims to comprehensively evaluate PSD's effectiveness across three key metrics: detumescence, prevention of recurrence, and erectile function preservation. A systematic review and meta-analysis, following PRISMA guidelines, identified 9 publications that met the inclusion criteria. They encompassed five case reports, two abstracts, and two observational cohort studies, with data on 62 patients who presented with refractory ischaemic priapism. Notably, around half (46.7%) of the patients had conventional distal shunts prior to PSD. Overall following PSD, detumescence was achieved in 89.3% (CI 95%, 0.78-0.95). Post-PSD recurrence of ischaemic priapism occurred in 12.7% (95% CI, 0.06-0.24). Erectile function was preserved in 54.8% of the patients who had follow-up (95% CI, 0.40-0.68). These findings inform us that PSD proves to be a viable and effective surgical option for refractory ischaemic priapism with a key feature being better sexual function preservation outcomes compared to shunting procedures. Given the paucity of data, further larger scale prospective studies of robust designs are still necessary to better establish PSD's role within the treatment algorithm for refractory ischaemic priapism.

阴部减压治疗难治性缺血性勃起功能障碍的疗效:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
阴茎减压术(PSD)已成为难治性缺血性阴茎勃起的一种很有前途的手术干预,包括近端切除和缺血血引流。初步结果显示,实现消肿的成功率高,复发率低,并相对较好地保留了勃起功能。本荟萃分析旨在全面评估PSD在三个关键指标上的有效性:消肿、预防复发和勃起功能保护。根据PRISMA指南进行系统回顾和荟萃分析,确定了9篇符合纳入标准的出版物。他们包括5个病例报告、2个摘要和2个观察性队列研究,包括62例难治性缺血性阴茎勃起障碍患者的数据。值得注意的是,大约一半(46.7%)的患者在PSD之前进行了传统的远端分流术。总的来说,PSD后消肿率为89.3% (CI 95%, 0.78-0.95)。psd后缺血性阴茎勃起的复发率为12.7% (95% CI, 0.06-0.24)。54.8%的随访患者勃起功能得以保留(95% CI, 0.40-0.68)。这些发现告诉我们,PSD被证明是治疗难治性缺血性阴茎勃起的可行和有效的手术选择,与分流手术相比,其关键特征是更好的性功能保存结果。考虑到数据的缺乏,为了更好地确定PSD在难治性缺血性勃起功能障碍治疗算法中的作用,还需要进一步更大规模的稳健设计的前瞻性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Impotence Research
International Journal of Impotence Research 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
19.20%
发文量
140
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Impotence Research: The Journal of Sexual Medicine addresses sexual medicine for both genders as an interdisciplinary field. This includes basic science researchers, urologists, endocrinologists, cardiologists, family practitioners, gynecologists, internists, neurologists, psychiatrists, psychologists, radiologists and other health care clinicians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信