Balloon dissection for robotic totally extra-peritoneal (rTEP) inguinal herniorrhaphy: description of a modified technique and report on 97 consecutive patients.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Hernia Pub Date : 2025-03-12 DOI:10.1007/s10029-025-03312-z
Karim S Trad, Shankar S Thiru, Thomas P Stirrat, Paul J Marino, Elizabeth R Prevou, Margaret E Greer, Yewande R Alimi
{"title":"Balloon dissection for robotic totally extra-peritoneal (rTEP) inguinal herniorrhaphy: description of a modified technique and report on 97 consecutive patients.","authors":"Karim S Trad, Shankar S Thiru, Thomas P Stirrat, Paul J Marino, Elizabeth R Prevou, Margaret E Greer, Yewande R Alimi","doi":"10.1007/s10029-025-03312-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>As the use of robotic platforms for inguinal hernia repairs continues to grow, the rTAPP (Robotic Trans-Abdominal Pre-Peritoneal) approach is being performed significantly more often than rTEP (Robotic Totally Extra-Peritoneal) and is predominantly taught to newly trained robotic surgeons. This study's primary objective was to evaluate the feasibility of a proposed modified rTEP technique that incorporates balloon dissection as a primary tool, enabling the horizontal placement of three trocars aligned with the umbilicus. Secondary objectives included evaluation of safety and effectiveness of this technique, and of the learning curve required to reach proficiency.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From February 2023 to April 2024, a total of 97 consecutive patients (87 males, 10 females) with an average age of 61 years (range 17-89) and a mean body mass index of 26 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (21-37) underwent rTEP for the repair of 122 inguinal and femoral hernias. All procedures were performed by a single surgeon following a standardized protocol detailed in this manuscript. Key metrics and events assessed included conversions to open or laparoscopic approaches, console operating times, postoperative narcotic usage, postoperative complications, serious adverse events, unplanned returns to the operating room within 30 days, and hernia recurrences. Cumulative sum (CUSUM)_sequential analysis was used for determination of the learning curve.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Repaired hernias included 57 indirect (46.7%), 48 direct (39.3%), 4 femoral (3.3%) and 13 mixed (10.7%). There were no conversions to open or laparoscopic surgery, and the average console time was 45 min for unilateral repairs and 68 min for bilateral repairs. 70% of patients elected not to use the narcotic prescribed for postoperative analgesia. There was one serious adverse event (1/97, 1.0%), and one unplanned return to the operating room within 30 days (1/97, 1.0%). Over an average follow-up period of 52 weeks (range 25-87 weeks), there was one recurrence (1/122, 0.8%). In our analysis of the learning curve, we found that proficiency was reached around the 24th non-complex unilateral case.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The modified rTEP technique utilizing balloon dissection is feasible, reproducible and time efficient. This study demonstrates its safety and effectiveness. The technique provides superior visualization of the extraperitoneal space, facilitates manipulation of robotic wristed instruments, and ensures proper mesh placement. Early postoperative outcomes suggest that rTEP could play an important role in the surgical management of inguinal and femoral hernias. Further studies are needed to provide data on short and long-term quality of life, and to compare rTEP to rTAPP.</p>","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":"29 1","pages":"115"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hernia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-025-03312-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: As the use of robotic platforms for inguinal hernia repairs continues to grow, the rTAPP (Robotic Trans-Abdominal Pre-Peritoneal) approach is being performed significantly more often than rTEP (Robotic Totally Extra-Peritoneal) and is predominantly taught to newly trained robotic surgeons. This study's primary objective was to evaluate the feasibility of a proposed modified rTEP technique that incorporates balloon dissection as a primary tool, enabling the horizontal placement of three trocars aligned with the umbilicus. Secondary objectives included evaluation of safety and effectiveness of this technique, and of the learning curve required to reach proficiency.

Methods: From February 2023 to April 2024, a total of 97 consecutive patients (87 males, 10 females) with an average age of 61 years (range 17-89) and a mean body mass index of 26 kg/m2 (21-37) underwent rTEP for the repair of 122 inguinal and femoral hernias. All procedures were performed by a single surgeon following a standardized protocol detailed in this manuscript. Key metrics and events assessed included conversions to open or laparoscopic approaches, console operating times, postoperative narcotic usage, postoperative complications, serious adverse events, unplanned returns to the operating room within 30 days, and hernia recurrences. Cumulative sum (CUSUM)_sequential analysis was used for determination of the learning curve.

Results: Repaired hernias included 57 indirect (46.7%), 48 direct (39.3%), 4 femoral (3.3%) and 13 mixed (10.7%). There were no conversions to open or laparoscopic surgery, and the average console time was 45 min for unilateral repairs and 68 min for bilateral repairs. 70% of patients elected not to use the narcotic prescribed for postoperative analgesia. There was one serious adverse event (1/97, 1.0%), and one unplanned return to the operating room within 30 days (1/97, 1.0%). Over an average follow-up period of 52 weeks (range 25-87 weeks), there was one recurrence (1/122, 0.8%). In our analysis of the learning curve, we found that proficiency was reached around the 24th non-complex unilateral case.

Conclusion: The modified rTEP technique utilizing balloon dissection is feasible, reproducible and time efficient. This study demonstrates its safety and effectiveness. The technique provides superior visualization of the extraperitoneal space, facilitates manipulation of robotic wristed instruments, and ensures proper mesh placement. Early postoperative outcomes suggest that rTEP could play an important role in the surgical management of inguinal and femoral hernias. Further studies are needed to provide data on short and long-term quality of life, and to compare rTEP to rTAPP.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hernia
Hernia SURGERY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
26.10%
发文量
171
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Hernia was founded in 1997 by Jean P. Chevrel with the purpose of promoting clinical studies and basic research as they apply to groin hernias and the abdominal wall . Since that time, a true revolution in the field of hernia studies has transformed the field from a ”simple” disease to one that is very specialized. While the majority of surgeries for primary inguinal and abdominal wall hernia are performed in hospitals worldwide, complex situations such as multi recurrences, complications, abdominal wall reconstructions and others are being studied and treated in specialist centers. As a result, major institutions and societies are creating specific parameters and criteria to better address the complexities of hernia surgery. Hernia is a journal written by surgeons who have made abdominal wall surgery their specific field of interest, but we will consider publishing content from any surgeon who wishes to improve the science of this field. The Journal aims to ensure that hernia surgery is safer and easier for surgeons as well as patients, and provides a forum to all surgeons in the exchange of new ideas, results, and important research that is the basis of professional activity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信