Robotic proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: a hybrid approach.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Pietro Calabrese, Orsalia Mangana, Carlo Alberto Manzo, Laura Muirhead, Valerio Celentano
{"title":"Robotic proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: a hybrid approach.","authors":"Pietro Calabrese, Orsalia Mangana, Carlo Alberto Manzo, Laura Muirhead, Valerio Celentano","doi":"10.1007/s00384-025-04854-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the definitive surgical treatment for patients with ulcerative colitis or familial adenomatous polyposis. While laparoscopic surgery has been widely adopted, robotic surgery has emerged as a promising alternative, particularly for complex pelvic dissection. However, the robotic learning curve presents significant challenges. This study introduces a hybrid approach combining robotic and laparoscopic techniques to leverage the strengths of both, with a focus on the impact of the robotic learning curve and surgical training.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients undergoing hybrid or laparoscopic proctocolectomy with IPAA for ulcerative colitis between 2022 and 2024 were included. Data on patient characteristics and postoperative outcomes were collected prospectively. Primary outcomes were operating time and 30-day morbidity. All robotic procedures were performed by a consultant surgeon within their first 100 robotic cases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 25 patients were included: 14 in the hybrid group and 11 in the laparoscopic group. The median operating time was 300 min for the hybrid approach versus 325 min for the laparoscopic approach. In the hybrid surgery group, between 72 and 90% of the laparoscopic part of the procedure was performed by a supervised surgical trainee.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The hybrid robotic-laparoscopic approach offers potential benefits over pure laparoscopy by reducing operative time and postoperative complications. Additionally, it provides a structured modular training opportunity, allowing surgeons to develop both laparoscopic and robotic skills, particularly during the early stages of their robotic learning curve.</p>","PeriodicalId":13789,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Colorectal Disease","volume":"40 1","pages":"63"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11903519/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Colorectal Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-025-04854-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the definitive surgical treatment for patients with ulcerative colitis or familial adenomatous polyposis. While laparoscopic surgery has been widely adopted, robotic surgery has emerged as a promising alternative, particularly for complex pelvic dissection. However, the robotic learning curve presents significant challenges. This study introduces a hybrid approach combining robotic and laparoscopic techniques to leverage the strengths of both, with a focus on the impact of the robotic learning curve and surgical training.

Methods: All patients undergoing hybrid or laparoscopic proctocolectomy with IPAA for ulcerative colitis between 2022 and 2024 were included. Data on patient characteristics and postoperative outcomes were collected prospectively. Primary outcomes were operating time and 30-day morbidity. All robotic procedures were performed by a consultant surgeon within their first 100 robotic cases.

Results: A total of 25 patients were included: 14 in the hybrid group and 11 in the laparoscopic group. The median operating time was 300 min for the hybrid approach versus 325 min for the laparoscopic approach. In the hybrid surgery group, between 72 and 90% of the laparoscopic part of the procedure was performed by a supervised surgical trainee.

Conclusions: The hybrid robotic-laparoscopic approach offers potential benefits over pure laparoscopy by reducing operative time and postoperative complications. Additionally, it provides a structured modular training opportunity, allowing surgeons to develop both laparoscopic and robotic skills, particularly during the early stages of their robotic learning curve.

机器人直结肠切除术与回肠袋-肛门吻合术:一种混合入路。
目的:直结肠切除术联合回肠袋-肛门吻合术(IPAA)是溃疡性结肠炎或家族性腺瘤性息肉病的最终手术治疗方法。虽然腹腔镜手术已被广泛采用,但机器人手术已成为一种有希望的替代方法,特别是对于复杂的骨盆解剖。然而,机器人的学习曲线提出了重大的挑战。本研究介绍了一种结合机器人和腹腔镜技术的混合方法,以利用两者的优势,重点关注机器人学习曲线和手术培训的影响。方法:纳入2022年至2024年间所有接受混合或腹腔镜直肠结肠切除术联合IPAA治疗溃疡性结肠炎的患者。前瞻性地收集患者特征和术后结果的数据。主要结局为手术时间和30天发病率。所有的机器人手术都是在前100个机器人病例中由一名顾问外科医生完成的。结果:共纳入25例患者,其中混合组14例,腹腔镜组11例。混合入路的中位手术时间为300分钟,而腹腔镜入路的中位手术时间为325分钟。在混合手术组中,72%到90%的腹腔镜部分手术是由一名有监督的外科实习生完成的。结论:与单纯腹腔镜相比,机器人-腹腔镜混合入路具有减少手术时间和术后并发症的潜在优势。此外,它提供了一个结构化的模块化培训机会,允许外科医生发展腹腔镜和机器人技能,特别是在机器人学习曲线的早期阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.60%
发文量
206
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Colorectal Disease, Clinical and Molecular Gastroenterology and Surgery aims to publish novel and state-of-the-art papers which deal with the physiology and pathophysiology of diseases involving the entire gastrointestinal tract. In addition to original research articles, the following categories will be included: reviews (usually commissioned but may also be submitted), case reports, letters to the editor, and protocols on clinical studies. The journal offers its readers an interdisciplinary forum for clinical science and molecular research related to gastrointestinal disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信