Latent dimensions of brain asymmetry.

Q2 Medicine
Chenghui Zhang, Yi Pu, Xiang-Zhen Kong
{"title":"Latent dimensions of brain asymmetry.","authors":"Chenghui Zhang, Yi Pu, Xiang-Zhen Kong","doi":"10.1016/B978-0-443-15646-5.00027-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Functional lateralization represents a fundamental aspect of brain organization, where certain cognitive functions are specialized in one hemisphere over the other. Deviations from typical patterns of lateralization often manifest in various brain disorders, such as autism spectrum disorder, schizophrenia, and dyslexia. However, despite its importance, uncovering the intrinsic properties of brain lateralization and its underlying structural basis remains challenging. On the one hand, functional lateralization has long been oversimplified, often reduced to a unidimensional perspective. For instance, individuals are sometimes labeled as left-brained or right-brained based on specific behavioral measures like handedness and language lateralization. Such a perspective disregards the nuanced subtypes of lateralization, each potentially attributed to distinct factors and associated with unique functional correlates. On the other hand, traditional studies of brain structural asymmetry have typically focused on localized analyses of homologous regions in the two hemispheres. This perspective fails to capture the inherent interplay between brain regions, resulting in an overly complex depiction of structural asymmetry. Such conceptual and methodological discrepancies between studies of functional lateralization and structural asymmetry pose significant obstacles to establishing meaningful links between them. To address this gap, a shift toward uncovering the dimensional structure of brain asymmetry has been proposed. This chapter introduces the concept of latent dimensions of brain asymmetry and provides an up-to-date overview of studies regarding dimensions of functional lateralization and structural asymmetry in the human brain. By transcending the traditional analysis and employing multivariate pattern techniques, these studies offer valuable insights into our understanding of the intricate organizational principles governing the human brain's lateralized functions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12907,"journal":{"name":"Handbook of clinical neurology","volume":"208 ","pages":"37-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Handbook of clinical neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-15646-5.00027-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Functional lateralization represents a fundamental aspect of brain organization, where certain cognitive functions are specialized in one hemisphere over the other. Deviations from typical patterns of lateralization often manifest in various brain disorders, such as autism spectrum disorder, schizophrenia, and dyslexia. However, despite its importance, uncovering the intrinsic properties of brain lateralization and its underlying structural basis remains challenging. On the one hand, functional lateralization has long been oversimplified, often reduced to a unidimensional perspective. For instance, individuals are sometimes labeled as left-brained or right-brained based on specific behavioral measures like handedness and language lateralization. Such a perspective disregards the nuanced subtypes of lateralization, each potentially attributed to distinct factors and associated with unique functional correlates. On the other hand, traditional studies of brain structural asymmetry have typically focused on localized analyses of homologous regions in the two hemispheres. This perspective fails to capture the inherent interplay between brain regions, resulting in an overly complex depiction of structural asymmetry. Such conceptual and methodological discrepancies between studies of functional lateralization and structural asymmetry pose significant obstacles to establishing meaningful links between them. To address this gap, a shift toward uncovering the dimensional structure of brain asymmetry has been proposed. This chapter introduces the concept of latent dimensions of brain asymmetry and provides an up-to-date overview of studies regarding dimensions of functional lateralization and structural asymmetry in the human brain. By transcending the traditional analysis and employing multivariate pattern techniques, these studies offer valuable insights into our understanding of the intricate organizational principles governing the human brain's lateralized functions.

大脑不对称的潜在维度。
功能侧化代表了大脑组织的一个基本方面,其中某些认知功能专门在一个半球而不是另一个半球。偏离典型的侧化模式通常表现在各种脑部疾病中,如自闭症谱系障碍、精神分裂症和阅读障碍。然而,尽管它很重要,但揭示大脑侧化的内在特性及其潜在的结构基础仍然具有挑战性。一方面,功能侧化长期以来被过度简化,往往被简化为单向度的视角。例如,个人有时会根据特定的行为指标(如惯用手和语言偏侧化)被标记为左脑或右脑。这种观点忽视了侧化的微妙亚型,每种亚型都可能归因于不同的因素,并与独特的功能相关。另一方面,对大脑结构不对称的传统研究通常集中在两个半球的同源区域的局部分析。这种观点未能捕捉到大脑区域之间的内在相互作用,导致对结构不对称的过于复杂的描述。功能侧化研究和结构不对称研究之间的这种概念和方法上的差异对在它们之间建立有意义的联系构成了重大障碍。为了解决这一差距,已经提出了一种转变,即揭示大脑不对称的维度结构。本章介绍了大脑不对称的潜在维度的概念,并提供了关于人类大脑功能侧化和结构不对称维度的最新研究综述。通过超越传统的分析和采用多元模式技术,这些研究为我们理解控制人类大脑侧化功能的复杂组织原理提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Handbook of clinical neurology
Handbook of clinical neurology Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
302
期刊介绍: The Handbook of Clinical Neurology (HCN) was originally conceived and edited by Pierre Vinken and George Bruyn as a prestigious, multivolume reference work that would cover all the disorders encountered by clinicians and researchers engaged in neurology and allied fields. The first series of the Handbook (Volumes 1-44) was published between 1968 and 1982 and was followed by a second series (Volumes 45-78), guided by the same editors, which concluded in 2002. By that time, the Handbook had come to represent one of the largest scientific works ever published. In 2002, Professors Michael J. Aminoff, François Boller, and Dick F. Swaab took on the responsibility of supervising the third (current) series, the first volumes of which published in 2003. They have designed this series to encompass both clinical neurology and also the basic and clinical neurosciences that are its underpinning. Given the enormity and complexity of the accumulating literature, it is almost impossible to keep abreast of developments in the field, thus providing the raison d''être for the series. The series will thus appeal to clinicians and investigators alike, providing to each an added dimension. Now, more than 140 volumes after it began, the Handbook of Clinical Neurology series has an unparalleled reputation for providing the latest information on fundamental research on the operation of the nervous system in health and disease, comprehensive clinical information on neurological and related disorders, and up-to-date treatment protocols.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信