Effects of Different Dentin Surface Cleaning Protocols on Bond Strength of Dual-Cure Resin Cement Following Temporary Cementation.

IF 2.1 Q1 Dentistry
European Journal of Dentistry Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-12 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1800824
Vichakorn Vongtavatchai, Boondarick Niyatiwatchanchai, Murali Srinivasan, Thantrira Porntaveetus, Junji Tagami, Anucharte Srijunbarl, Kornwasa Siripamitdul, Dusit Nantanapiboon
{"title":"Effects of Different Dentin Surface Cleaning Protocols on Bond Strength of Dual-Cure Resin Cement Following Temporary Cementation.","authors":"Vichakorn Vongtavatchai, Boondarick Niyatiwatchanchai, Murali Srinivasan, Thantrira Porntaveetus, Junji Tagami, Anucharte Srijunbarl, Kornwasa Siripamitdul, Dusit Nantanapiboon","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1800824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of various cleaning protocols on the bond strength of dual-cure resin cement following temporary cementation.Fifty-two human third molars were sectioned to expose superficial dentin and divided into four groups: (1) fresh, noncontaminated dentin (control); (2) pumice cleaning; (3) pumice + sodium bicarbonate air polishing; and (4) pumice + 10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) based cleaner. Groups 2, 3, and 4 were treated with noneugenol zinc oxide temporary cement, followed by their respective cleaning protocols. After the teeth were cleaned, the restorative procedure was performed. All dentin surfaces were then bonded with a composite restoration using dual-cure resin cement. Shear bond strength was tested using a universal testing machine until failure. Surface morphology was assessed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM), and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) was used to analyze the residual elements on the dentin surface.Group differences were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tamhane's post hoc test. Chi-squared tests were used to assess the differences in failure mode proportions among groups. All statistical analyses were conducted at a significance level of <i>p</i> < 0.05.ANOVA revealed significant differences in bond strength among the groups (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Post hoc analysis showed no significant difference in bond strength between the control group and the sodium bicarbonate air polishing or MDP-based cleaner groups. However, the pumice polishing group exhibited a significantly lower bond strength compared to all other groups (<i>p</i> < 0.001). SEM-EDS analysis confirmed incomplete removal of temporary cement with pumice polishing, as evidenced by residual cement and elevated levels of zinc and oxygen ions.Pumice polishing alone was insufficient for removing temporary cement, resulting in reduced bond strength of the subsequently applied resin cement. This study demonstrated that combining pumice with sodium bicarbonate air polishing or MDP-based cleaner effectively removed cement and restored bond strength to levels comparable to fresh, noncontaminated dentin.</p>","PeriodicalId":12028,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":"1025-1034"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12494448/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1800824","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of various cleaning protocols on the bond strength of dual-cure resin cement following temporary cementation.Fifty-two human third molars were sectioned to expose superficial dentin and divided into four groups: (1) fresh, noncontaminated dentin (control); (2) pumice cleaning; (3) pumice + sodium bicarbonate air polishing; and (4) pumice + 10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP) based cleaner. Groups 2, 3, and 4 were treated with noneugenol zinc oxide temporary cement, followed by their respective cleaning protocols. After the teeth were cleaned, the restorative procedure was performed. All dentin surfaces were then bonded with a composite restoration using dual-cure resin cement. Shear bond strength was tested using a universal testing machine until failure. Surface morphology was assessed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM), and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) was used to analyze the residual elements on the dentin surface.Group differences were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tamhane's post hoc test. Chi-squared tests were used to assess the differences in failure mode proportions among groups. All statistical analyses were conducted at a significance level of p < 0.05.ANOVA revealed significant differences in bond strength among the groups (p < 0.001). Post hoc analysis showed no significant difference in bond strength between the control group and the sodium bicarbonate air polishing or MDP-based cleaner groups. However, the pumice polishing group exhibited a significantly lower bond strength compared to all other groups (p < 0.001). SEM-EDS analysis confirmed incomplete removal of temporary cement with pumice polishing, as evidenced by residual cement and elevated levels of zinc and oxygen ions.Pumice polishing alone was insufficient for removing temporary cement, resulting in reduced bond strength of the subsequently applied resin cement. This study demonstrated that combining pumice with sodium bicarbonate air polishing or MDP-based cleaner effectively removed cement and restored bond strength to levels comparable to fresh, noncontaminated dentin.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

牙本质表面不同清洁方式对双固化树脂水泥土临时固接后粘结强度的影响。
目的:本研究的目的是比较不同的清洁方案对临时胶结后双固化树脂水泥的结合强度的有效性。材料与方法:将52颗人第三磨牙切开暴露表层牙本质,分为4组:(1)新鲜、无污染的牙本质(对照组);(2)浮石清洗;(3)浮石+碳酸氢钠空气抛光;浮石+ 10-甲基丙烯酰氧癸基磷酸二氢(MDP)基清洗剂。第2组、第3组和第4组采用非丁香酚氧化锌临时水泥处理,然后采用各自的清洁方案。牙齿清洁后,进行修复手术。所有牙本质表面都用双固化树脂水泥进行复合修复。剪切粘结强度采用万能试验机测试,直至失效。用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)分析牙本质表面形貌,用能谱仪(EDS)分析牙本质表面残留元素。统计分析:采用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)分析组间差异,采用Tamhane事后检验。卡方检验用于评估各组间失效模式比例的差异。所有统计分析均在p的显著性水平上进行。结果:方差分析显示各组间的结合强度有显著差异(p p)。结论:单纯浮石抛光不足以去除临时水泥,导致后续应用树脂水泥的结合强度降低。该研究表明,浮石与碳酸氢钠空气抛光或mdp清洗剂相结合,可以有效去除水泥,并将胶结强度恢复到与新鲜、未污染的牙本质相当的水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Dentistry
European Journal of Dentistry Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
161
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Dentistry is the official journal of the Dental Investigations Society, based in Turkey. It is a double-blinded peer-reviewed, Open Access, multi-disciplinary international journal addressing various aspects of dentistry. The journal''s board consists of eminent investigators in dentistry from across the globe and presents an ideal international composition. The journal encourages its authors to submit original investigations, reviews, and reports addressing various divisions of dentistry including oral pathology, prosthodontics, endodontics, orthodontics etc. It is available both online and in print.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信