Samantha N Rowland, Mariasole Da Boit, Rachel Tan, Liam M Heaney, Stephen J Bailey
{"title":"Comparing 17β-estradiol and progesterone concentrations in young, physically active females: Insights from plasma versus serum analysis.","authors":"Samantha N Rowland, Mariasole Da Boit, Rachel Tan, Liam M Heaney, Stephen J Bailey","doi":"10.1113/EP092415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Serum measurements of 17β-estradiol and progesterone are widely used to verify menstrual cycle status and confirm contraceptive use, often through commercially available immunoassay kits. However, no studies have investigated whether blood collection tube chemistries influence hormone concentrations in young females, despite assays permitting the use of different biofluids with similar reference ranges. In this study, venous blood was sampled from physically active females (n = 25) using Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and serum vacutainers, and 17β-estradiol and progesterone concentrations were measured using competitive immunoenzymatic assays. Median plasma concentrations of 17β-estradiol and progesterone were 44.2% (plasma 40.75 vs. serum 28.25 pg/ml) and 78.9% (plasma 1.70 vs. serum 0.95 ng/ml) higher than serum concentrations, respectively (P < 0.001 for both). Strong positive correlations were observed between plasma and serum concentrations for 17β-estradiol (r = 0.72; P < 0.001) and progesterone (r = 0.89; P < 0.001). The mean bias and limits of agreement for plasma versus serum were 12.5 pg/ml (-20.6 to 45.5 pg/ml) for 17β-estradiol and 1.01 ng/ml (-5.6 to 7.6 ng/ml) for progesterone. Ovarian hormone levels were consistently higher in EDTA plasma compared with serum, with these matrices not yielding statistically equivalent results. Despite these differences, the strong correlations and good agreement suggest that both matrices are suitable for biomarker analysis. Researchers using EDTA plasma should account for the higher hormone concentrations when applying inclusion or exclusion criteria, because adjustments might be necessary to ensure appropriate participant classification.</p>","PeriodicalId":12092,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Physiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1113/EP092415","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Serum measurements of 17β-estradiol and progesterone are widely used to verify menstrual cycle status and confirm contraceptive use, often through commercially available immunoassay kits. However, no studies have investigated whether blood collection tube chemistries influence hormone concentrations in young females, despite assays permitting the use of different biofluids with similar reference ranges. In this study, venous blood was sampled from physically active females (n = 25) using Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and serum vacutainers, and 17β-estradiol and progesterone concentrations were measured using competitive immunoenzymatic assays. Median plasma concentrations of 17β-estradiol and progesterone were 44.2% (plasma 40.75 vs. serum 28.25 pg/ml) and 78.9% (plasma 1.70 vs. serum 0.95 ng/ml) higher than serum concentrations, respectively (P < 0.001 for both). Strong positive correlations were observed between plasma and serum concentrations for 17β-estradiol (r = 0.72; P < 0.001) and progesterone (r = 0.89; P < 0.001). The mean bias and limits of agreement for plasma versus serum were 12.5 pg/ml (-20.6 to 45.5 pg/ml) for 17β-estradiol and 1.01 ng/ml (-5.6 to 7.6 ng/ml) for progesterone. Ovarian hormone levels were consistently higher in EDTA plasma compared with serum, with these matrices not yielding statistically equivalent results. Despite these differences, the strong correlations and good agreement suggest that both matrices are suitable for biomarker analysis. Researchers using EDTA plasma should account for the higher hormone concentrations when applying inclusion or exclusion criteria, because adjustments might be necessary to ensure appropriate participant classification.
期刊介绍:
Experimental Physiology publishes research papers that report novel insights into homeostatic and adaptive responses in health, as well as those that further our understanding of pathophysiological mechanisms in disease. We encourage papers that embrace the journal’s orientation of translation and integration, including studies of the adaptive responses to exercise, acute and chronic environmental stressors, growth and aging, and diseases where integrative homeostatic mechanisms play a key role in the response to and evolution of the disease process. Examples of such diseases include hypertension, heart failure, hypoxic lung disease, endocrine and neurological disorders. We are also keen to publish research that has a translational aspect or clinical application. Comparative physiology work that can be applied to aid the understanding human physiology is also encouraged.
Manuscripts that report the use of bioinformatic, genomic, molecular, proteomic and cellular techniques to provide novel insights into integrative physiological and pathophysiological mechanisms are welcomed.