Antonia Schuster, Andreas Horn, Florian Günther, Martin Fleck, Wolfgang Hartung, Boris Ehrenstein
{"title":"HF-Ultrasonography to Quantify Skin Atrophy in Patients with Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases Treated with Courses of Glucocorticoids.","authors":"Antonia Schuster, Andreas Horn, Florian Günther, Martin Fleck, Wolfgang Hartung, Boris Ehrenstein","doi":"10.3390/diagnostics15050619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Prolonged courses of glucocorticoids (GCs) for patients suffering from inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRDs) are associated with adverse effects. High-frequency ultrasonography (HFUS) has been utilized to quantify skin changes during short-term topical GC treatment. We aimed to quantify skin atrophy in IRD patients treated systemically with prolonged courses of GCs. <b>Methods</b>: We performed a cross-sectional study comparing patients with IRDs and GC treatment who presented with clinically evident skin atrophy to a matched cohort (1:1) without IRDs and GC treatment. Skinfold measurements, utilizing a standardized caliper, and B-mode HFUS images, utilizing an 18 MHz linear sonography probe, were acquired at back-of-hand, cubital, and dorsal midfoot regions and then compared between both groups. <b>Results</b>: A total of 53 GC-treated IRD patients (33 (62%) women, mean age 66.4 (±10.0) years, GC treatment median 8.0 (1.0-47.0) years) were compared to 53 subjects without IRDs and GC treatment (32 (60%) women, 65.9 (±11.3) years). Skinfold thickness measured at the back of hands [1.7 (±0.4) vs. 2.1 (±0.5) mm, <i>p</i> < 0.001], but not at the cubital [6.7 (±2.7) vs. 7.1 (±3.0) mm] or dorsal midfoot [3.6 (±3.7) vs. 4.1 (±3.4) mm] areas, showed a significant difference between the groups. In comparison, all areas displayed statistically significant different cutaneous thickness in the evaluation by HFUS: hand 0.66 (±0.12) vs. 0.82 (±0.18), <i>p</i> < 0.001; cubital 0.86 (±0.15) vs. 1.00 (±0.21), <i>p</i> < 0.001; and midfoot 0.76 (±0.16) vs. 0.94 (±0.18), <i>p</i> < 0.001. <b>Conclusions</b>: This study revealed significantly lower values in the measured cutaneous thickness by HFUS for GC-treated patients with IRDs compared to persons without IRD and GC treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":11225,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostics","volume":"15 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11898456/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15050619","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Prolonged courses of glucocorticoids (GCs) for patients suffering from inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRDs) are associated with adverse effects. High-frequency ultrasonography (HFUS) has been utilized to quantify skin changes during short-term topical GC treatment. We aimed to quantify skin atrophy in IRD patients treated systemically with prolonged courses of GCs. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional study comparing patients with IRDs and GC treatment who presented with clinically evident skin atrophy to a matched cohort (1:1) without IRDs and GC treatment. Skinfold measurements, utilizing a standardized caliper, and B-mode HFUS images, utilizing an 18 MHz linear sonography probe, were acquired at back-of-hand, cubital, and dorsal midfoot regions and then compared between both groups. Results: A total of 53 GC-treated IRD patients (33 (62%) women, mean age 66.4 (±10.0) years, GC treatment median 8.0 (1.0-47.0) years) were compared to 53 subjects without IRDs and GC treatment (32 (60%) women, 65.9 (±11.3) years). Skinfold thickness measured at the back of hands [1.7 (±0.4) vs. 2.1 (±0.5) mm, p < 0.001], but not at the cubital [6.7 (±2.7) vs. 7.1 (±3.0) mm] or dorsal midfoot [3.6 (±3.7) vs. 4.1 (±3.4) mm] areas, showed a significant difference between the groups. In comparison, all areas displayed statistically significant different cutaneous thickness in the evaluation by HFUS: hand 0.66 (±0.12) vs. 0.82 (±0.18), p < 0.001; cubital 0.86 (±0.15) vs. 1.00 (±0.21), p < 0.001; and midfoot 0.76 (±0.16) vs. 0.94 (±0.18), p < 0.001. Conclusions: This study revealed significantly lower values in the measured cutaneous thickness by HFUS for GC-treated patients with IRDs compared to persons without IRD and GC treatment.
DiagnosticsBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
2699
审稿时长
19.64 days
期刊介绍:
Diagnostics (ISSN 2075-4418) is an international scholarly open access journal on medical diagnostics. It publishes original research articles, reviews, communications and short notes on the research and development of medical diagnostics. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodological details must be provided for research articles.