Eligibility for eCPR Warming in Hypothermic Cardiac Arrest: Lack of Guidelines and the Current Constraints of Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Decision-Making.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Michał P Pluta, Tomasz Darocha, Michał Pasternak, Mathieu Pasquier, Konrad Mendrala, Radosław Gocoł, Sylweriusz Kosiński
{"title":"Eligibility for eCPR Warming in Hypothermic Cardiac Arrest: Lack of Guidelines and the Current Constraints of Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Decision-Making.","authors":"Michał P Pluta, Tomasz Darocha, Michał Pasternak, Mathieu Pasquier, Konrad Mendrala, Radosław Gocoł, Sylweriusz Kosiński","doi":"10.1111/aor.14993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim of the study: </strong>Artificial intelligence (AI) such as large language models (LLMs) tools are potential sources of information on hypothermic cardiac arrest (HCA). The aim of our study was to determine whether, for patients with HCA, LLMs provide information consistent with expert consensus on criteria that would usually contraindicate extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCRP) in patients with normothermic cardiac arrest (NCA), but not HCA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Based on Extracorporeal Life Support Organization guidelines, selected factors were identified that may be contraindications to eCPR in NCA but not in HCA. Four questions were created and entered into AI software (GPT-3.5 turbo, GPT-4o, GPT-4o-mini, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Claude 3 Haiku, Mistral Large, Mistral Small, Gemini Pro and Gemini Flash). The responses obtained and citations returned were assessed by an international panel of experts for consistency with current knowledge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Complete agreement of responses with expert consensus was obtained for 5/10 AI tools. In total, all AI tools presented 101 items in the literature. No reference was rated as \"correct\"; 45 citations (45%) \"existed but did not answer the question\"; and 56 citations (55%) were considered \"hallucinatory\".</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Use of artificial intelligence in decision-making for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in patients with hypothermic cardiac arrest risks unjustifiably withdrawing treatment from patients who have a chance of survival with a good neurological outcome. Large language models should not be used as the only tool for decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":8450,"journal":{"name":"Artificial organs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial organs","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aor.14993","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim of the study: Artificial intelligence (AI) such as large language models (LLMs) tools are potential sources of information on hypothermic cardiac arrest (HCA). The aim of our study was to determine whether, for patients with HCA, LLMs provide information consistent with expert consensus on criteria that would usually contraindicate extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCRP) in patients with normothermic cardiac arrest (NCA), but not HCA.

Methods: Based on Extracorporeal Life Support Organization guidelines, selected factors were identified that may be contraindications to eCPR in NCA but not in HCA. Four questions were created and entered into AI software (GPT-3.5 turbo, GPT-4o, GPT-4o-mini, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Claude 3 Haiku, Mistral Large, Mistral Small, Gemini Pro and Gemini Flash). The responses obtained and citations returned were assessed by an international panel of experts for consistency with current knowledge.

Results: Complete agreement of responses with expert consensus was obtained for 5/10 AI tools. In total, all AI tools presented 101 items in the literature. No reference was rated as "correct"; 45 citations (45%) "existed but did not answer the question"; and 56 citations (55%) were considered "hallucinatory".

Conclusion: Use of artificial intelligence in decision-making for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in patients with hypothermic cardiac arrest risks unjustifiably withdrawing treatment from patients who have a chance of survival with a good neurological outcome. Large language models should not be used as the only tool for decision-making.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Artificial organs
Artificial organs 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
303
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Artificial Organs is the official peer reviewed journal of The International Federation for Artificial Organs (Members of the Federation are: The American Society for Artificial Internal Organs, The European Society for Artificial Organs, and The Japanese Society for Artificial Organs), The International Faculty for Artificial Organs, the International Society for Rotary Blood Pumps, The International Society for Pediatric Mechanical Cardiopulmonary Support, and the Vienna International Workshop on Functional Electrical Stimulation. Artificial Organs publishes original research articles dealing with developments in artificial organs applications and treatment modalities and their clinical applications worldwide. Membership in the Societies listed above is not a prerequisite for publication. Articles are published without charge to the author except for color figures and excess page charges as noted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信