In vitro performance of a charcoal capturing device with desflurane.

IF 9.1 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Maurits Hoffmann, Jennifer Jouwena, Andre M De Wolf, Rik Carette, Rinaldo S H Lauwers, Jan F A Hendrickx
{"title":"In vitro performance of a charcoal capturing device with desflurane.","authors":"Maurits Hoffmann, Jennifer Jouwena, Andre M De Wolf, Rik Carette, Rinaldo S H Lauwers, Jan F A Hendrickx","doi":"10.1097/ALN.0000000000005445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of capturing devices may become required for the continued use desflurane. We tested the percentage of desflurane captured by a charcoal filter (CONTRAfluran)-workstation (Aisys) combination in vitro.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Desflurane in O2/air was administered via an Aisys workstation into a 2 L test lung that was insufflated with CO2 (160 mL/min). First, to confirm all vaporized desflurane reached the capturing device, the amount of desflurane collected in a Douglas bag attached to the machine exhaust was compared to the vaporized amount during 15 min runs with the following fresh gas flow (FGF)//vaporizer setting combinations: (L/min // %): 0.3//8, 0.5//8, 1//6, 2//6, 3//6, 4//6, 5//6, and 6//6. Next, to determine the effect of CO2, the capturing device weight gain was measured with the same FGF ran over 1 hour but without desflurane. Finally, the ratio of the capturing device weight gain / vaporizer weight loss (= performance, expressed in %) was determined for the same 15 min runs with desflurane vaporizer settings described above. All experiments were arbitrarily repeated five times.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The amount of vaporized desflurane did not differ from the amount collected in the Douglas bag. When CO2, O2, and air were delivered without desflurane, the capturing device lost a relatively small amount of weight (<5 g), especially with FGF ≤ 1 L/min. Finally, performance with 0.3, 0.5-2 and 3-6L/min FGF was 103, 100, and 95 - 93 %, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CONTRAfluran charcoal filter in vitro performance for desflurane in O2/air combined with the Aisys workstation ranged from 93-103 % with FGF of 0.3 to 3-6 L/min with vaporizer settings that reflect clinical conditions. Defining the place of charcoal filters in clinical practice requires full life cycle analysis of both the charcoal and inhaled agent.</p>","PeriodicalId":7970,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000005445","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The use of capturing devices may become required for the continued use desflurane. We tested the percentage of desflurane captured by a charcoal filter (CONTRAfluran)-workstation (Aisys) combination in vitro.

Methods: Desflurane in O2/air was administered via an Aisys workstation into a 2 L test lung that was insufflated with CO2 (160 mL/min). First, to confirm all vaporized desflurane reached the capturing device, the amount of desflurane collected in a Douglas bag attached to the machine exhaust was compared to the vaporized amount during 15 min runs with the following fresh gas flow (FGF)//vaporizer setting combinations: (L/min // %): 0.3//8, 0.5//8, 1//6, 2//6, 3//6, 4//6, 5//6, and 6//6. Next, to determine the effect of CO2, the capturing device weight gain was measured with the same FGF ran over 1 hour but without desflurane. Finally, the ratio of the capturing device weight gain / vaporizer weight loss (= performance, expressed in %) was determined for the same 15 min runs with desflurane vaporizer settings described above. All experiments were arbitrarily repeated five times.

Results: The amount of vaporized desflurane did not differ from the amount collected in the Douglas bag. When CO2, O2, and air were delivered without desflurane, the capturing device lost a relatively small amount of weight (<5 g), especially with FGF ≤ 1 L/min. Finally, performance with 0.3, 0.5-2 and 3-6L/min FGF was 103, 100, and 95 - 93 %, respectively.

Conclusions: CONTRAfluran charcoal filter in vitro performance for desflurane in O2/air combined with the Aisys workstation ranged from 93-103 % with FGF of 0.3 to 3-6 L/min with vaporizer settings that reflect clinical conditions. Defining the place of charcoal filters in clinical practice requires full life cycle analysis of both the charcoal and inhaled agent.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anesthesiology
Anesthesiology 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
5.70%
发文量
542
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: With its establishment in 1940, Anesthesiology has emerged as a prominent leader in the field of anesthesiology, encompassing perioperative, critical care, and pain medicine. As the esteemed journal of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Anesthesiology operates independently with full editorial freedom. Its distinguished Editorial Board, comprising renowned professionals from across the globe, drives the advancement of the specialty by presenting innovative research through immediate open access to select articles and granting free access to all published articles after a six-month period. Furthermore, Anesthesiology actively promotes groundbreaking studies through an influential press release program. The journal's unwavering commitment lies in the dissemination of exemplary work that enhances clinical practice and revolutionizes the practice of medicine within our discipline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信