Maurits Hoffmann, Jennifer Jouwena, Andre M De Wolf, Rik Carette, Rinaldo S H Lauwers, Jan F A Hendrickx
{"title":"In vitro performance of a charcoal capturing device with desflurane.","authors":"Maurits Hoffmann, Jennifer Jouwena, Andre M De Wolf, Rik Carette, Rinaldo S H Lauwers, Jan F A Hendrickx","doi":"10.1097/ALN.0000000000005445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of capturing devices may become required for the continued use desflurane. We tested the percentage of desflurane captured by a charcoal filter (CONTRAfluran)-workstation (Aisys) combination in vitro.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Desflurane in O2/air was administered via an Aisys workstation into a 2 L test lung that was insufflated with CO2 (160 mL/min). First, to confirm all vaporized desflurane reached the capturing device, the amount of desflurane collected in a Douglas bag attached to the machine exhaust was compared to the vaporized amount during 15 min runs with the following fresh gas flow (FGF)//vaporizer setting combinations: (L/min // %): 0.3//8, 0.5//8, 1//6, 2//6, 3//6, 4//6, 5//6, and 6//6. Next, to determine the effect of CO2, the capturing device weight gain was measured with the same FGF ran over 1 hour but without desflurane. Finally, the ratio of the capturing device weight gain / vaporizer weight loss (= performance, expressed in %) was determined for the same 15 min runs with desflurane vaporizer settings described above. All experiments were arbitrarily repeated five times.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The amount of vaporized desflurane did not differ from the amount collected in the Douglas bag. When CO2, O2, and air were delivered without desflurane, the capturing device lost a relatively small amount of weight (<5 g), especially with FGF ≤ 1 L/min. Finally, performance with 0.3, 0.5-2 and 3-6L/min FGF was 103, 100, and 95 - 93 %, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CONTRAfluran charcoal filter in vitro performance for desflurane in O2/air combined with the Aisys workstation ranged from 93-103 % with FGF of 0.3 to 3-6 L/min with vaporizer settings that reflect clinical conditions. Defining the place of charcoal filters in clinical practice requires full life cycle analysis of both the charcoal and inhaled agent.</p>","PeriodicalId":7970,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000005445","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The use of capturing devices may become required for the continued use desflurane. We tested the percentage of desflurane captured by a charcoal filter (CONTRAfluran)-workstation (Aisys) combination in vitro.
Methods: Desflurane in O2/air was administered via an Aisys workstation into a 2 L test lung that was insufflated with CO2 (160 mL/min). First, to confirm all vaporized desflurane reached the capturing device, the amount of desflurane collected in a Douglas bag attached to the machine exhaust was compared to the vaporized amount during 15 min runs with the following fresh gas flow (FGF)//vaporizer setting combinations: (L/min // %): 0.3//8, 0.5//8, 1//6, 2//6, 3//6, 4//6, 5//6, and 6//6. Next, to determine the effect of CO2, the capturing device weight gain was measured with the same FGF ran over 1 hour but without desflurane. Finally, the ratio of the capturing device weight gain / vaporizer weight loss (= performance, expressed in %) was determined for the same 15 min runs with desflurane vaporizer settings described above. All experiments were arbitrarily repeated five times.
Results: The amount of vaporized desflurane did not differ from the amount collected in the Douglas bag. When CO2, O2, and air were delivered without desflurane, the capturing device lost a relatively small amount of weight (<5 g), especially with FGF ≤ 1 L/min. Finally, performance with 0.3, 0.5-2 and 3-6L/min FGF was 103, 100, and 95 - 93 %, respectively.
Conclusions: CONTRAfluran charcoal filter in vitro performance for desflurane in O2/air combined with the Aisys workstation ranged from 93-103 % with FGF of 0.3 to 3-6 L/min with vaporizer settings that reflect clinical conditions. Defining the place of charcoal filters in clinical practice requires full life cycle analysis of both the charcoal and inhaled agent.
期刊介绍:
With its establishment in 1940, Anesthesiology has emerged as a prominent leader in the field of anesthesiology, encompassing perioperative, critical care, and pain medicine. As the esteemed journal of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Anesthesiology operates independently with full editorial freedom. Its distinguished Editorial Board, comprising renowned professionals from across the globe, drives the advancement of the specialty by presenting innovative research through immediate open access to select articles and granting free access to all published articles after a six-month period. Furthermore, Anesthesiology actively promotes groundbreaking studies through an influential press release program. The journal's unwavering commitment lies in the dissemination of exemplary work that enhances clinical practice and revolutionizes the practice of medicine within our discipline.