{"title":"Consequences of Domestication on Gut Microbiome: A Comparative Analysis Between Wild Boars and Domestic Pigs.","authors":"Da-Yun Bae, Sung-Hyun Moon, Taek Geun Lee, Young-Seung Ko, Yun-Chae Cho, Hamin Kang, Chan-Soo Park, Jung-Sun Kang, Yeonsu Oh, Ho-Seong Cho","doi":"10.3390/ani15050747","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The gut microbiota plays a vital role in the physiological functions and health of animals. Domestic pigs (<i>Sus scrofa domesticus</i>) and wild boars (<i>Sus scrofa scrofa</i>), which share a common ancestor, present a unique model for exploring the evolutionary changes in gut microbiota due to domestication. Comparing the gut microbiota of these two groups provides a unique opportunity to identify microorganisms that may have been lost or altered during domestication. This study employed 16S rRNA sequencing to compare the gut microbiota compositions of domestic pigs and wild boars, analyzing 69 fecal samples from both groups. Our results indicate significant differences in the taxonomic profiles of the gut microbiota between the two groups. Specifically, the genera <i>Bifidobacterium</i> and <i>Lactobacillus</i>, were found in higher abundance in wild boars. In contrast, domestic pigs exhibited a decreased variety of these potentially health-enhancing bacteria, likely due to factors such as simplified diets and antibiotic use. Functional gene analysis revealed that pathways related to carbohydrate metabolism, lipid metabolism, immune response, and environmental adaptability were more enriched in wild boars. These findings demonstrate significant differences in the gut microbiota composition between domestic pigs and wild boars, underscoring the impact of domestication on microbial diversity. Further research is necessary to explore the potential of transferring beneficial microbes from wild to domestic populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":7955,"journal":{"name":"Animals","volume":"15 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11899531/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animals","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15050747","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The gut microbiota plays a vital role in the physiological functions and health of animals. Domestic pigs (Sus scrofa domesticus) and wild boars (Sus scrofa scrofa), which share a common ancestor, present a unique model for exploring the evolutionary changes in gut microbiota due to domestication. Comparing the gut microbiota of these two groups provides a unique opportunity to identify microorganisms that may have been lost or altered during domestication. This study employed 16S rRNA sequencing to compare the gut microbiota compositions of domestic pigs and wild boars, analyzing 69 fecal samples from both groups. Our results indicate significant differences in the taxonomic profiles of the gut microbiota between the two groups. Specifically, the genera Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus, were found in higher abundance in wild boars. In contrast, domestic pigs exhibited a decreased variety of these potentially health-enhancing bacteria, likely due to factors such as simplified diets and antibiotic use. Functional gene analysis revealed that pathways related to carbohydrate metabolism, lipid metabolism, immune response, and environmental adaptability were more enriched in wild boars. These findings demonstrate significant differences in the gut microbiota composition between domestic pigs and wild boars, underscoring the impact of domestication on microbial diversity. Further research is necessary to explore the potential of transferring beneficial microbes from wild to domestic populations.
AnimalsAgricultural and Biological Sciences-Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
3015
审稿时长
20.52 days
期刊介绍:
Animals (ISSN 2076-2615) is an international and interdisciplinary scholarly open access journal. It publishes original research articles, reviews, communications, and short notes that are relevant to any field of study that involves animals, including zoology, ethnozoology, animal science, animal ethics and animal welfare. However, preference will be given to those articles that provide an understanding of animals within a larger context (i.e., the animals'' interactions with the outside world, including humans). There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental details and/or method of study, must be provided for research articles. Articles submitted that involve subjecting animals to unnecessary pain or suffering will not be accepted, and all articles must be submitted with the necessary ethical approval (please refer to the Ethical Guidelines for more information).