Comparison of Pregabalin and Midazolam as Premedication in Children Undergoing General Anesthesia for Dental Treatment.

Q2 Medicine
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-15 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.5812/aapm-149486
Maryam Hajiahmadi, Nasser Kaviani, Elahe Asnaashari Esfahani, Sanaz Rajaee
{"title":"Comparison of Pregabalin and Midazolam as Premedication in Children Undergoing General Anesthesia for Dental Treatment.","authors":"Maryam Hajiahmadi, Nasser Kaviani, Elahe Asnaashari Esfahani, Sanaz Rajaee","doi":"10.5812/aapm-149486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pediatric dentists employ both pharmacological and non-pharmacological behavior control methods. Despite the use of behavioral control techniques, some young children cannot undergo treatment in the office, making sedation or general anesthesia necessary. Premedication drugs can be used before general anesthesia to reduce anxiety, control pain, induce amnesia, prevent nausea, and avert potential complications. The search for the ideal premedication for children is ongoing.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to compare the effects of pregabalin and midazolam (MID) in children undergoing dental treatment under general anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, triple-blind study included 64 children aged 2 - 6 years who required dental treatment under general anesthesia. Participants who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled. One group of children received pregabalin syrup, while the other group received MID syrup. The comfort of the child during separation from the parents, ease of venous access, and degree of sedation upon entering the operating room were evaluated. Blood pressure, heart rate, and blood oxygen levels were measured at baseline and every 30 minutes thereafter. Additionally, the duration of the patient's stay in recovery until discharge was recorded and compared between the two groups. Statistical analyses were performed using chi-square, Mann-Whitney U, Fisher's exact test, and SPSS version 14 software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistically significant differences were found between premedication with MID and pregabalin in terms of anxiety during venous access, parental separation anxiety, restlessness in recovery, duration of recovery stay, or changes in heart rate, blood pressure, and blood oxygen levels between the two groups. However, a statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups regarding the degree of sedation before entering the operating room.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both pregabalin and MID were effective for premedication in terms of sedation and anxiety reduction, with no significant difference between the two drugs in these outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":7841,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine","volume":"14 6","pages":"e149486"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11895789/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm-149486","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pediatric dentists employ both pharmacological and non-pharmacological behavior control methods. Despite the use of behavioral control techniques, some young children cannot undergo treatment in the office, making sedation or general anesthesia necessary. Premedication drugs can be used before general anesthesia to reduce anxiety, control pain, induce amnesia, prevent nausea, and avert potential complications. The search for the ideal premedication for children is ongoing.

Objectives: This study aims to compare the effects of pregabalin and midazolam (MID) in children undergoing dental treatment under general anesthesia.

Methods: This prospective, triple-blind study included 64 children aged 2 - 6 years who required dental treatment under general anesthesia. Participants who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled. One group of children received pregabalin syrup, while the other group received MID syrup. The comfort of the child during separation from the parents, ease of venous access, and degree of sedation upon entering the operating room were evaluated. Blood pressure, heart rate, and blood oxygen levels were measured at baseline and every 30 minutes thereafter. Additionally, the duration of the patient's stay in recovery until discharge was recorded and compared between the two groups. Statistical analyses were performed using chi-square, Mann-Whitney U, Fisher's exact test, and SPSS version 14 software.

Results: No statistically significant differences were found between premedication with MID and pregabalin in terms of anxiety during venous access, parental separation anxiety, restlessness in recovery, duration of recovery stay, or changes in heart rate, blood pressure, and blood oxygen levels between the two groups. However, a statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups regarding the degree of sedation before entering the operating room.

Conclusions: Both pregabalin and MID were effective for premedication in terms of sedation and anxiety reduction, with no significant difference between the two drugs in these outcomes.

普瑞巴林与咪达唑仑在儿童牙科全麻治疗前用药的比较。
背景:儿科牙医采用药物和非药物行为控制方法。尽管使用了行为控制技术,但一些幼儿不能在办公室接受治疗,因此需要镇静或全身麻醉。用药前用药可在全身麻醉前使用,以减轻焦虑、控制疼痛、诱导健忘症、防止恶心和避免潜在的并发症。为儿童寻找理想的预用药仍在进行中。目的:本研究旨在比较普瑞巴林和咪达唑仑(MID)在全麻下儿童牙科治疗中的效果。方法:这项前瞻性三盲研究包括64名2 - 6岁的儿童,他们需要在全身麻醉下进行牙科治疗。符合纳入标准的参与者入组。一组患儿服用普瑞巴林糖浆,另一组患儿服用MID糖浆。评估患儿与父母分离时的舒适度、静脉通路的便利性及进入手术室时的镇静程度。在基线和之后每30分钟测量一次血压、心率和血氧水平。此外,记录患者在康复期间的住院时间直到出院,并比较两组之间的差异。统计学分析采用卡方、Mann-Whitney U、Fisher精确检验和SPSS 14软件。结果:治疗前使用MID和普瑞巴林在静脉插管时的焦虑、父母分离焦虑、恢复时的躁动、恢复停留时间、心率、血压和血氧水平的变化方面,两组间无统计学差异。然而,两组在进入手术室前的镇静程度上有统计学上的显著差异。结论:普瑞巴林和MID在药物前镇静和减轻焦虑方面均有效,两种药物在这些结果上无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信