Ultrasound as a Diagnostic Tool in Detection of Maxillofacial Fractures at Level 1 Trauma Centre ED in India

Q3 Medicine
Afroz Fatima, Priyanka Modi, Tej Prakash Sinha, Sanjeev Bhoi, Atin Kumar, Sushma Sagar
{"title":"Ultrasound as a Diagnostic Tool in Detection of Maxillofacial Fractures at Level 1 Trauma Centre ED in India","authors":"Afroz Fatima,&nbsp;Priyanka Modi,&nbsp;Tej Prakash Sinha,&nbsp;Sanjeev Bhoi,&nbsp;Atin Kumar,&nbsp;Sushma Sagar","doi":"10.1002/ajum.70001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Injuries, especially maxillofacial fractures, pose a significant global health burden exacerbated by increasing traffic activities. Early detection is vital for preventing complications. This study assesses ultrasound's diagnostic efficacy, aiming to improve patient management and minimise treatment delays by detecting maxillofacial fractures promptly and accurately.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>The main aim was to assess point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in diagnosing maxillofacial fractures against computed tomography (CT) scans. Secondary goals included identifying ocular injuries, mandibular fractures, assessing probe feasibility and comparing Le Fort classification via ultrasound and CT.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methodology</h3>\n \n <p>Between January 2019 and February 2021, 150 trauma patients (136 male) with a mean age of 28.5 ± 5 years (range, 18–62 years) suspected of maxillofacial fractures were enrolled. A trained physician performed facial ultrasound, and findings were documented alongside CT scan results. Using the SPSS software, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and diagnostic accuracy of POCUS against CT scans were analysed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Among 150 patients, CT scans diagnosed 137 with maxillofacial fractures, primarily due to road traffic accidents. Zygomatic fractures were most common, followed by nasal bone and mandibular parasymphysial fractures. POCUS exhibited high sensitivity (98.9%), specificity (99.1%), PPV (92%), and NPV (99.8%) for overall facial fractures, varying by bone. Associated occult ocular injuries occurred in two patients. Sensitivity and specificity were high for mandibular fractures. 5–10 MHz frequency linear probe, footprint-50 mm was optimal for midfacial bones, but Le Fort fractures could not be reliably identified using ultrasound.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The study underscores the value of POCUS in the Emergency Department for detecting maxillofacial fractures, despite limitations such as anatomical challenges. POCUS showed high diagnostic accuracy, emphasising its potential in clinical practice, requiring further validation and exploration.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36517,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","volume":"28 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajum.70001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Injuries, especially maxillofacial fractures, pose a significant global health burden exacerbated by increasing traffic activities. Early detection is vital for preventing complications. This study assesses ultrasound's diagnostic efficacy, aiming to improve patient management and minimise treatment delays by detecting maxillofacial fractures promptly and accurately.

Objective

The main aim was to assess point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in diagnosing maxillofacial fractures against computed tomography (CT) scans. Secondary goals included identifying ocular injuries, mandibular fractures, assessing probe feasibility and comparing Le Fort classification via ultrasound and CT.

Methodology

Between January 2019 and February 2021, 150 trauma patients (136 male) with a mean age of 28.5 ± 5 years (range, 18–62 years) suspected of maxillofacial fractures were enrolled. A trained physician performed facial ultrasound, and findings were documented alongside CT scan results. Using the SPSS software, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and diagnostic accuracy of POCUS against CT scans were analysed.

Results

Among 150 patients, CT scans diagnosed 137 with maxillofacial fractures, primarily due to road traffic accidents. Zygomatic fractures were most common, followed by nasal bone and mandibular parasymphysial fractures. POCUS exhibited high sensitivity (98.9%), specificity (99.1%), PPV (92%), and NPV (99.8%) for overall facial fractures, varying by bone. Associated occult ocular injuries occurred in two patients. Sensitivity and specificity were high for mandibular fractures. 5–10 MHz frequency linear probe, footprint-50 mm was optimal for midfacial bones, but Le Fort fractures could not be reliably identified using ultrasound.

Conclusion

The study underscores the value of POCUS in the Emergency Department for detecting maxillofacial fractures, despite limitations such as anatomical challenges. POCUS showed high diagnostic accuracy, emphasising its potential in clinical practice, requiring further validation and exploration.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine
Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信