{"title":"Application of multiple criteria decision aiding in environmental policy-making processes","authors":"P. Digkoglou, J. Papathanasiou","doi":"10.1007/s13762-024-06101-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Environmental issues have gained global prominence, prompting extensive global efforts toward sustainability. Within this landscape, multiple criteria decision aiding (MCDA) emerges as a pivotal tool, intricately intertwined with policy and decision-making processes to navigate uncertainties. This paper rigorously investigates application of MCDA in environmental decision-making processes and policy-making, shedding light on challenges and limitations in its practical implementation. While acknowledging MCDA's potential to address complex issues, the study critically examines its real-world utility in environmental policy-making. Drawing insights from 80 review papers and 9 related papers, the research underscores MCDA's evolving adaptability in managing diverse objectives and assessment criteria. It emphasises MCDA's value for policy makers by facilitating the implementation of effective policies, offering clarity for future policy directions, and assessing trade-offs among multiple goals. Despite these merits, the study identifies key challenges, including method selection influenced by expertise. Inherent uncertainties, varying stakeholder participation levels, and the delicate balance between expert-driven and collaborative approaches also present significant hurdles. Addressing subjectivity in evaluations, providing clear options in complex scenarios, and applying MCDA to dynamic problems are also identified as challenges. Additional obstacles include formulating criteria, integrating uncertainty, managing long-term perspectives, and ensuring practical and enduring benefits in policy decision-making. The paper highlights the lack of methodological guidance for the application of MCDA in environmental policy-making, emphasises the shortcomings of stakeholder engagement, and acknowledges data limitations as additional barriers. Consequently, given the uncertainties surrounding environmental issues, the study underscores the need for adjustments to effectively employ MCDA in such complex situations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":589,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology","volume":"22 8","pages":"6967 - 6982"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13762-024-06101-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Environmental issues have gained global prominence, prompting extensive global efforts toward sustainability. Within this landscape, multiple criteria decision aiding (MCDA) emerges as a pivotal tool, intricately intertwined with policy and decision-making processes to navigate uncertainties. This paper rigorously investigates application of MCDA in environmental decision-making processes and policy-making, shedding light on challenges and limitations in its practical implementation. While acknowledging MCDA's potential to address complex issues, the study critically examines its real-world utility in environmental policy-making. Drawing insights from 80 review papers and 9 related papers, the research underscores MCDA's evolving adaptability in managing diverse objectives and assessment criteria. It emphasises MCDA's value for policy makers by facilitating the implementation of effective policies, offering clarity for future policy directions, and assessing trade-offs among multiple goals. Despite these merits, the study identifies key challenges, including method selection influenced by expertise. Inherent uncertainties, varying stakeholder participation levels, and the delicate balance between expert-driven and collaborative approaches also present significant hurdles. Addressing subjectivity in evaluations, providing clear options in complex scenarios, and applying MCDA to dynamic problems are also identified as challenges. Additional obstacles include formulating criteria, integrating uncertainty, managing long-term perspectives, and ensuring practical and enduring benefits in policy decision-making. The paper highlights the lack of methodological guidance for the application of MCDA in environmental policy-making, emphasises the shortcomings of stakeholder engagement, and acknowledges data limitations as additional barriers. Consequently, given the uncertainties surrounding environmental issues, the study underscores the need for adjustments to effectively employ MCDA in such complex situations.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology (IJEST) is an international scholarly refereed research journal which aims to promote the theory and practice of environmental science and technology, innovation, engineering and management.
A broad outline of the journal''s scope includes: peer reviewed original research articles, case and technical reports, reviews and analyses papers, short communications and notes to the editor, in interdisciplinary information on the practice and status of research in environmental science and technology, both natural and man made.
The main aspects of research areas include, but are not exclusive to; environmental chemistry and biology, environments pollution control and abatement technology, transport and fate of pollutants in the environment, concentrations and dispersion of wastes in air, water, and soil, point and non-point sources pollution, heavy metals and organic compounds in the environment, atmospheric pollutants and trace gases, solid and hazardous waste management; soil biodegradation and bioremediation of contaminated sites; environmental impact assessment, industrial ecology, ecological and human risk assessment; improved energy management and auditing efficiency and environmental standards and criteria.