Application of multiple criteria decision aiding in environmental policy-making processes

IF 3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
P. Digkoglou, J. Papathanasiou
{"title":"Application of multiple criteria decision aiding in environmental policy-making processes","authors":"P. Digkoglou,&nbsp;J. Papathanasiou","doi":"10.1007/s13762-024-06101-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Environmental issues have gained global prominence, prompting extensive global efforts toward sustainability. Within this landscape, multiple criteria decision aiding (MCDA) emerges as a pivotal tool, intricately intertwined with policy and decision-making processes to navigate uncertainties. This paper rigorously investigates application of MCDA in environmental decision-making processes and policy-making, shedding light on challenges and limitations in its practical implementation. While acknowledging MCDA's potential to address complex issues, the study critically examines its real-world utility in environmental policy-making. Drawing insights from 80 review papers and 9 related papers, the research underscores MCDA's evolving adaptability in managing diverse objectives and assessment criteria. It emphasises MCDA's value for policy makers by facilitating the implementation of effective policies, offering clarity for future policy directions, and assessing trade-offs among multiple goals. Despite these merits, the study identifies key challenges, including method selection influenced by expertise. Inherent uncertainties, varying stakeholder participation levels, and the delicate balance between expert-driven and collaborative approaches also present significant hurdles. Addressing subjectivity in evaluations, providing clear options in complex scenarios, and applying MCDA to dynamic problems are also identified as challenges. Additional obstacles include formulating criteria, integrating uncertainty, managing long-term perspectives, and ensuring practical and enduring benefits in policy decision-making. The paper highlights the lack of methodological guidance for the application of MCDA in environmental policy-making, emphasises the shortcomings of stakeholder engagement, and acknowledges data limitations as additional barriers. Consequently, given the uncertainties surrounding environmental issues, the study underscores the need for adjustments to effectively employ MCDA in such complex situations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":589,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology","volume":"22 8","pages":"6967 - 6982"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13762-024-06101-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Environmental issues have gained global prominence, prompting extensive global efforts toward sustainability. Within this landscape, multiple criteria decision aiding (MCDA) emerges as a pivotal tool, intricately intertwined with policy and decision-making processes to navigate uncertainties. This paper rigorously investigates application of MCDA in environmental decision-making processes and policy-making, shedding light on challenges and limitations in its practical implementation. While acknowledging MCDA's potential to address complex issues, the study critically examines its real-world utility in environmental policy-making. Drawing insights from 80 review papers and 9 related papers, the research underscores MCDA's evolving adaptability in managing diverse objectives and assessment criteria. It emphasises MCDA's value for policy makers by facilitating the implementation of effective policies, offering clarity for future policy directions, and assessing trade-offs among multiple goals. Despite these merits, the study identifies key challenges, including method selection influenced by expertise. Inherent uncertainties, varying stakeholder participation levels, and the delicate balance between expert-driven and collaborative approaches also present significant hurdles. Addressing subjectivity in evaluations, providing clear options in complex scenarios, and applying MCDA to dynamic problems are also identified as challenges. Additional obstacles include formulating criteria, integrating uncertainty, managing long-term perspectives, and ensuring practical and enduring benefits in policy decision-making. The paper highlights the lack of methodological guidance for the application of MCDA in environmental policy-making, emphasises the shortcomings of stakeholder engagement, and acknowledges data limitations as additional barriers. Consequently, given the uncertainties surrounding environmental issues, the study underscores the need for adjustments to effectively employ MCDA in such complex situations.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.50%
发文量
806
审稿时长
10.8 months
期刊介绍: International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology (IJEST) is an international scholarly refereed research journal which aims to promote the theory and practice of environmental science and technology, innovation, engineering and management. A broad outline of the journal''s scope includes: peer reviewed original research articles, case and technical reports, reviews and analyses papers, short communications and notes to the editor, in interdisciplinary information on the practice and status of research in environmental science and technology, both natural and man made. The main aspects of research areas include, but are not exclusive to; environmental chemistry and biology, environments pollution control and abatement technology, transport and fate of pollutants in the environment, concentrations and dispersion of wastes in air, water, and soil, point and non-point sources pollution, heavy metals and organic compounds in the environment, atmospheric pollutants and trace gases, solid and hazardous waste management; soil biodegradation and bioremediation of contaminated sites; environmental impact assessment, industrial ecology, ecological and human risk assessment; improved energy management and auditing efficiency and environmental standards and criteria.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信