Avoiding commercial kit-based DNA isolation and purification steps: a rapid method for Cryptosporidium oocyst detection†

IF 3.5 Q2 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Rabbee G. Mahmudunnabi, Amandeep Singh Pannu, Nam-Trung Nguyen, Helen M. Stratton and Muhammad J. A. Shiddiky
{"title":"Avoiding commercial kit-based DNA isolation and purification steps: a rapid method for Cryptosporidium oocyst detection†","authors":"Rabbee G. Mahmudunnabi, Amandeep Singh Pannu, Nam-Trung Nguyen, Helen M. Stratton and Muhammad J. A. Shiddiky","doi":"10.1039/D4SD00344F","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Current routine diagnostic tests for <em>Cryptosporidium</em> oocysts in water are performed in centralised laboratories using the National Association of Testing Authorities (NATA) approved USEPA Method 1623.1. This method uses fluorescent microscopy, which suffers from artefacts and false positive responses from contaminating oocyst-size particles. Additionally, existing molecular detection methods based on real-time PCR (qPCR) require purified nucleic acid, primarily relying on laborious, time-consuming, and expensive centralised laboratory-based DNA isolation procedures using commercial kits. Both the microscopy and PCR-based molecular techniques are not suitable for rapid detection due to the nature of the experiment and instrumentation. This study reports a rapid and simple method that eliminates the need for multi-step DNA isolation and purification procedures. The method involves the direct heat lysis of magnetically isolated <em>Cryptosporidium</em> oocysts from water samples, followed by a loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP)-based detection. The analytical performance of this assay reveals a LOD of 0.17 copies per μL of genomic DNA (gDNA) with a dynamic range from 1.05 × 10<small><sup>4</sup></small> copies per μL to 1.05 copies per μL. We simulated the matrix effect by putting mud into tap water and spiked oocysts to demonstrate the practical applicability of the assay. The designed LAMP detected as low as 5 and 10 oocysts per 10 mL of tap water without and with simulated matrices, respectively. The ultrasensitive nature of this assay can be attributed to its acceleration due to targeting an intron-less gene. We propose that this simple and rapid method can be extended to detect various types of pathogens.</p>","PeriodicalId":74786,"journal":{"name":"Sensors & diagnostics","volume":" 3","pages":" 229-238"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2025/sd/d4sd00344f?page=search","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sensors & diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/sd/d4sd00344f","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Current routine diagnostic tests for Cryptosporidium oocysts in water are performed in centralised laboratories using the National Association of Testing Authorities (NATA) approved USEPA Method 1623.1. This method uses fluorescent microscopy, which suffers from artefacts and false positive responses from contaminating oocyst-size particles. Additionally, existing molecular detection methods based on real-time PCR (qPCR) require purified nucleic acid, primarily relying on laborious, time-consuming, and expensive centralised laboratory-based DNA isolation procedures using commercial kits. Both the microscopy and PCR-based molecular techniques are not suitable for rapid detection due to the nature of the experiment and instrumentation. This study reports a rapid and simple method that eliminates the need for multi-step DNA isolation and purification procedures. The method involves the direct heat lysis of magnetically isolated Cryptosporidium oocysts from water samples, followed by a loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP)-based detection. The analytical performance of this assay reveals a LOD of 0.17 copies per μL of genomic DNA (gDNA) with a dynamic range from 1.05 × 104 copies per μL to 1.05 copies per μL. We simulated the matrix effect by putting mud into tap water and spiked oocysts to demonstrate the practical applicability of the assay. The designed LAMP detected as low as 5 and 10 oocysts per 10 mL of tap water without and with simulated matrices, respectively. The ultrasensitive nature of this assay can be attributed to its acceleration due to targeting an intron-less gene. We propose that this simple and rapid method can be extended to detect various types of pathogens.

Abstract Image

避免基于商业试剂盒的DNA分离和纯化步骤:隐孢子虫卵囊检测的快速方法
目前对水中隐孢子虫卵囊的常规诊断测试是在中央实验室使用国家测试机构协会(NATA)批准的USEPA方法1623.1进行的。这种方法使用荧光显微镜,由于污染卵囊大小的颗粒,会产生伪影和假阳性反应。此外,现有的基于实时PCR (qPCR)的分子检测方法需要纯化的核酸,主要依赖于费力、耗时和昂贵的基于集中式实验室的DNA分离程序,使用商业试剂盒。由于实验和仪器的性质,显微镜和基于pcr的分子技术都不适合快速检测。本研究报告了一种快速和简单的方法,消除了对多步骤DNA分离和纯化程序的需要。该方法包括直接热分解从水样中磁分离的隐孢子虫卵囊,然后进行环介导的等温扩增(LAMP)检测。该方法的LOD为0.17 copies / μL,动态范围为1.05 × 104 copies / μL ~ 1.05 copies / μL。我们通过在自来水和卵囊中加入泥浆来模拟基质效应,以证明该方法的实用性。设计的LAMP在无模拟基质和含模拟基质的自来水中分别检测到每10 mL低至5个和10个卵囊。该检测的超灵敏性质可归因于其由于靶向内含子较少的基因而加速。我们建议,这种简单快速的方法可以推广到检测各种类型的病原体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信