On cutting coal dependency for establishing a cleaner energy mix: A proposal for energy transition strategy in South Africa

IF 7.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Sinan Erdogan , Ugur Korkut Pata , Andrew Adewale Alola , Chukwuemeka Echebiri
{"title":"On cutting coal dependency for establishing a cleaner energy mix: A proposal for energy transition strategy in South Africa","authors":"Sinan Erdogan ,&nbsp;Ugur Korkut Pata ,&nbsp;Andrew Adewale Alola ,&nbsp;Chukwuemeka Echebiri","doi":"10.1016/j.esr.2025.101694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Although coal has powered economic activities for decades and significantly contributed to increasing economic welfare at the global level, its place in the modern economic system remained controversial because of its environmental impacts. Thus, cutting coal utilization and dependency on this energy source posits a great environmental benefit. With is motivation, the primary motivation of this study is to investigate the role of possible cleaner energy alternatives in cutting coal dependence in South Africa, which is prevalently utilizing coal in energy. To this end, the study employs Fully Modified Ordinary Least Squares (FMOLS) as a baseline estimator and Canonical Regression (CCR) as a robustness check from 1984 to 2022. The obtained outcomes denote that (i) an inverted U-shaped nexus exists between economic growth and coal utilization in some models. (ii) Renewable and hydro energy use has a negative and statistically significant impact on coal use, while nuclear energy and natural gas have no statistically significant impact. (iii) Population density spurs coal utilization. (iv) Robustness checks imply that empirical outcomes are substantially robust. In this regard, South Africa could reduce the demand for coal with renewable and hydro energy sources.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11546,"journal":{"name":"Energy Strategy Reviews","volume":"58 ","pages":"Article 101694"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Strategy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211467X25000574","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although coal has powered economic activities for decades and significantly contributed to increasing economic welfare at the global level, its place in the modern economic system remained controversial because of its environmental impacts. Thus, cutting coal utilization and dependency on this energy source posits a great environmental benefit. With is motivation, the primary motivation of this study is to investigate the role of possible cleaner energy alternatives in cutting coal dependence in South Africa, which is prevalently utilizing coal in energy. To this end, the study employs Fully Modified Ordinary Least Squares (FMOLS) as a baseline estimator and Canonical Regression (CCR) as a robustness check from 1984 to 2022. The obtained outcomes denote that (i) an inverted U-shaped nexus exists between economic growth and coal utilization in some models. (ii) Renewable and hydro energy use has a negative and statistically significant impact on coal use, while nuclear energy and natural gas have no statistically significant impact. (iii) Population density spurs coal utilization. (iv) Robustness checks imply that empirical outcomes are substantially robust. In this regard, South Africa could reduce the demand for coal with renewable and hydro energy sources.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Strategy Reviews
Energy Strategy Reviews Energy-Energy (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
4.90%
发文量
167
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy Strategy Reviews is a gold open access journal that provides authoritative content on strategic decision-making and vision-sharing related to society''s energy needs. Energy Strategy Reviews publishes: • Analyses • Methodologies • Case Studies • Reviews And by invitation: • Report Reviews • Viewpoints
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信