FMRI activation during paragraph reading in pediatric epilepsy

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Gabrielle L. Sarlo , Chloe A. Hooker , Kelly T. Macdonald , Leigh N. Sepeta , William D. Gaillard , Hua Xie , Madison M. Berl
{"title":"FMRI activation during paragraph reading in pediatric epilepsy","authors":"Gabrielle L. Sarlo ,&nbsp;Chloe A. Hooker ,&nbsp;Kelly T. Macdonald ,&nbsp;Leigh N. Sepeta ,&nbsp;William D. Gaillard ,&nbsp;Hua Xie ,&nbsp;Madison M. Berl","doi":"10.1016/j.yebeh.2025.110341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study examined brain activation differences during paragraph reading between children with and without epilepsy and if findings were related to neuropsychological performance. Exploratory analyses assessed activation in a subset of struggling readers.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study included 41 children with focal epilepsy (M = 10.5 years, 2.2) and 41 healthy controls with a similar mean age (M = 10 years, 1.7) who completed a neuropsychological battery and a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) paragraph reading task. Analyses included group comparisons of activation, including exploratory analyses with a subset of struggling readers with epilepsy. Correlational analyses examined relationships between activation and neuropsychological performance.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Despite significant differences in neuropsychological performance, there were no group differences in activation on reading fMRI between children with and without epilepsy. Across the combined sample, better sight word reading, reading fluency, and reading comprehension were positively correlated with activation of the left superior temporal gyrus. A subset analysis comparing healthy controls and non-struggling epilepsy readers to struggling epilepsy readers (SS &lt; 85) showed more activation in the control groups compared to the struggling readers in focused areas including bilateral temporal gyrus, left cerebellum, and right inferior frontal gyrus. The subset of struggling readers was more likely than the non-struggling patient group to have frequent seizures and their seizure focus ipsilateral to their language dominance.</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>Despite worse neuropsychological performance, the reading network was similarly activated in children with and without epilepsy. Relative to the broader functional network for reading, small, focused areas—particularly in the superior temporal lobe—were associated with less activation for those who had worse reading performance. Use of an fMRI paragraph reading task matched to a child’s level show no to small differences related to epilepsy or reading performance which suggests its robustness as a task when the goal is to identify the language network such as for presurgical mapping.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11847,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsy & Behavior","volume":"166 ","pages":"Article 110341"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsy & Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525505025000800","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study examined brain activation differences during paragraph reading between children with and without epilepsy and if findings were related to neuropsychological performance. Exploratory analyses assessed activation in a subset of struggling readers.

Methods

The study included 41 children with focal epilepsy (M = 10.5 years, 2.2) and 41 healthy controls with a similar mean age (M = 10 years, 1.7) who completed a neuropsychological battery and a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) paragraph reading task. Analyses included group comparisons of activation, including exploratory analyses with a subset of struggling readers with epilepsy. Correlational analyses examined relationships between activation and neuropsychological performance.

Results

Despite significant differences in neuropsychological performance, there were no group differences in activation on reading fMRI between children with and without epilepsy. Across the combined sample, better sight word reading, reading fluency, and reading comprehension were positively correlated with activation of the left superior temporal gyrus. A subset analysis comparing healthy controls and non-struggling epilepsy readers to struggling epilepsy readers (SS < 85) showed more activation in the control groups compared to the struggling readers in focused areas including bilateral temporal gyrus, left cerebellum, and right inferior frontal gyrus. The subset of struggling readers was more likely than the non-struggling patient group to have frequent seizures and their seizure focus ipsilateral to their language dominance.

Significance

Despite worse neuropsychological performance, the reading network was similarly activated in children with and without epilepsy. Relative to the broader functional network for reading, small, focused areas—particularly in the superior temporal lobe—were associated with less activation for those who had worse reading performance. Use of an fMRI paragraph reading task matched to a child’s level show no to small differences related to epilepsy or reading performance which suggests its robustness as a task when the goal is to identify the language network such as for presurgical mapping.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Epilepsy & Behavior
Epilepsy & Behavior 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
15.40%
发文量
385
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: Epilepsy & Behavior is the fastest-growing international journal uniquely devoted to the rapid dissemination of the most current information available on the behavioral aspects of seizures and epilepsy. Epilepsy & Behavior presents original peer-reviewed articles based on laboratory and clinical research. Topics are drawn from a variety of fields, including clinical neurology, neurosurgery, neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology, neurophysiology, neuropharmacology, and neuroimaging. From September 2012 Epilepsy & Behavior stopped accepting Case Reports for publication in the journal. From this date authors who submit to Epilepsy & Behavior will be offered a transfer or asked to resubmit their Case Reports to its new sister journal, Epilepsy & Behavior Case Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信