Artificial intelligence (ChatGPT 4.0) vs. Human expertise for epileptic seizure and epilepsy diagnosis and classification in Adults: An exploratory study

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Francesco Brigo , Serena Broggi , Gionata Strigaro , Sasha Olivo , Valentina Tommasini , Magdalena Massar , Gianni Turcato , Arian Zaboli
{"title":"Artificial intelligence (ChatGPT 4.0) vs. Human expertise for epileptic seizure and epilepsy diagnosis and classification in Adults: An exploratory study","authors":"Francesco Brigo ,&nbsp;Serena Broggi ,&nbsp;Gionata Strigaro ,&nbsp;Sasha Olivo ,&nbsp;Valentina Tommasini ,&nbsp;Magdalena Massar ,&nbsp;Gianni Turcato ,&nbsp;Arian Zaboli","doi":"10.1016/j.yebeh.2025.110364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><div>Artificial intelligence (AI) tools like ChatGPT hold promise for enhancing diagnostic accuracy and efficiency in clinical practice. This exploratory study evaluates ChatGPT’s performance in diagnosing and classifying epileptic seizures, epilepsy, and underlying etiologies in adult patients compared to epileptologists and neurologists.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A prospective simulation study assessed 37 clinical vignettes based on real adult patient cases. ChatGPT was ’trained’ using official ILAE documents on epilepsy diagnosis and classification. Diagnoses and classifications by ChatGPT, two epileptologists, and two neurologists were compared against a reference standard set by a senior epileptologist. Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Cohen’s kappa (κ) was calculated to assess agreement.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>ChatGPT demonstrated high sensitivity (≥96.9 %) in identifying epileptic seizures and diagnosing epilepsy, ensuring no cases were missed. However, its specificity was lower, particularly for distinguishing acute symptomatic from unprovoked seizures (33.3 %) and diagnosing epilepsy (26.7 %), leading to frequent false positives. ChatGPT excelled in diagnosing epileptic syndromes (κ = 1.00) and structural etiologies (accuracy = 90.0 %) but struggled with ambiguous cases such as unknown seizure onset (accuracy = 12.5 %) and rare etiologies. Human experts consistently outperformed ChatGPT with near-perfect accuracy and higher κ values.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>ChatGPT shows potential as a supplementary diagnostic tool but requires human oversight due to reduced specificity and limitations in nuanced clinical judgment. Further development with diverse datasets and targeted training is necessary to improve AI performance. Integrating AI with expert clinicians can optimize diagnostic workflows in epilepsy care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11847,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsy & Behavior","volume":"166 ","pages":"Article 110364"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsy & Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525505025001039","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims

Artificial intelligence (AI) tools like ChatGPT hold promise for enhancing diagnostic accuracy and efficiency in clinical practice. This exploratory study evaluates ChatGPT’s performance in diagnosing and classifying epileptic seizures, epilepsy, and underlying etiologies in adult patients compared to epileptologists and neurologists.

Methods

A prospective simulation study assessed 37 clinical vignettes based on real adult patient cases. ChatGPT was ’trained’ using official ILAE documents on epilepsy diagnosis and classification. Diagnoses and classifications by ChatGPT, two epileptologists, and two neurologists were compared against a reference standard set by a senior epileptologist. Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Cohen’s kappa (κ) was calculated to assess agreement.

Results

ChatGPT demonstrated high sensitivity (≥96.9 %) in identifying epileptic seizures and diagnosing epilepsy, ensuring no cases were missed. However, its specificity was lower, particularly for distinguishing acute symptomatic from unprovoked seizures (33.3 %) and diagnosing epilepsy (26.7 %), leading to frequent false positives. ChatGPT excelled in diagnosing epileptic syndromes (κ = 1.00) and structural etiologies (accuracy = 90.0 %) but struggled with ambiguous cases such as unknown seizure onset (accuracy = 12.5 %) and rare etiologies. Human experts consistently outperformed ChatGPT with near-perfect accuracy and higher κ values.

Conclusion

ChatGPT shows potential as a supplementary diagnostic tool but requires human oversight due to reduced specificity and limitations in nuanced clinical judgment. Further development with diverse datasets and targeted training is necessary to improve AI performance. Integrating AI with expert clinicians can optimize diagnostic workflows in epilepsy care.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Epilepsy & Behavior
Epilepsy & Behavior 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
15.40%
发文量
385
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: Epilepsy & Behavior is the fastest-growing international journal uniquely devoted to the rapid dissemination of the most current information available on the behavioral aspects of seizures and epilepsy. Epilepsy & Behavior presents original peer-reviewed articles based on laboratory and clinical research. Topics are drawn from a variety of fields, including clinical neurology, neurosurgery, neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology, neurophysiology, neuropharmacology, and neuroimaging. From September 2012 Epilepsy & Behavior stopped accepting Case Reports for publication in the journal. From this date authors who submit to Epilepsy & Behavior will be offered a transfer or asked to resubmit their Case Reports to its new sister journal, Epilepsy & Behavior Case Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信