Greer McKendrick , Caitlyn J. Durgin , Andrew S. Huhn , Cecilia L. Bergeria , Patrick H. Finan , Denis Antoine , Kelly E. Dunn
{"title":"Inter-individual divergence in thresholds for detecting opioid effects: Within-subject human laboratory evidence of a testable behavioral phenotype","authors":"Greer McKendrick , Caitlyn J. Durgin , Andrew S. Huhn , Cecilia L. Bergeria , Patrick H. Finan , Denis Antoine , Kelly E. Dunn","doi":"10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2025.112644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Variations in inter-individual response to opioid medications has not been well-investigated in prospective, empirical designs or in persons who have no learned experience with opioids or current pain conditions. These analyses categorized response to opioids during rigorous human laboratory experimental conditions. Healthy individuals (N = 75) with little to no prior opioid exposure completed a 5-day residential study wherein they received triple-blinded doses of placebo or oral hydromorphone (2<!--> <!-->mg, 4<!--> <!-->mg, 8<!--> <!-->mg). Outcomes included a series of general and specific visual analog scale (VAS) ratings completed by participants and blinded observers, physiological endpoints, and analgesic responses to laboratory-evoked pain. The lowest dose at which participants endorsed > 20 point change in self-reported “Drug Effect” VAS ratings from baseline was used to define the following opioid sensitivity thresholds: 2<!--> <!-->mg (“Low Threshold”, N = 9), 4<!--> <!-->mg (“Medium”; N = 29), and 8<!--> <!-->mg (“High”, N = 14); a “No Threshold” group (N = 31) did not endorse any effects at any dose. Main effects of sensitivity threshold existed for most participant-reported responses and conformed to threshold categories in dose-dependent ways. In contrast, no main effects of sensitivity threshold were observed for blinded observer ratings, physiological endpoints, or evoked analgesic responses, such that hydromorphone produced dose-dependent opioid agonist effects for all participants that diverged from their self-reported experience. These data provide the most granular assessment of inter-individual differences in opioid response among persons with little or no lifetime opioid exposure or existing pain condition. All participants experienced dose-dependent changes in opioid agonist responses, yet their self-awareness of these effects varied and 30 % of participants endorsed no awareness of opioid exposure at any dose. These data demonstrate a consistent and reliable divergence between the subjective experience of opioids from rigorously-assessed physiological, observable, and analgesic responses. Testable implications of these outcomes are discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11322,"journal":{"name":"Drug and alcohol dependence","volume":"271 ","pages":"Article 112644"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug and alcohol dependence","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0376871625000973","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Variations in inter-individual response to opioid medications has not been well-investigated in prospective, empirical designs or in persons who have no learned experience with opioids or current pain conditions. These analyses categorized response to opioids during rigorous human laboratory experimental conditions. Healthy individuals (N = 75) with little to no prior opioid exposure completed a 5-day residential study wherein they received triple-blinded doses of placebo or oral hydromorphone (2 mg, 4 mg, 8 mg). Outcomes included a series of general and specific visual analog scale (VAS) ratings completed by participants and blinded observers, physiological endpoints, and analgesic responses to laboratory-evoked pain. The lowest dose at which participants endorsed > 20 point change in self-reported “Drug Effect” VAS ratings from baseline was used to define the following opioid sensitivity thresholds: 2 mg (“Low Threshold”, N = 9), 4 mg (“Medium”; N = 29), and 8 mg (“High”, N = 14); a “No Threshold” group (N = 31) did not endorse any effects at any dose. Main effects of sensitivity threshold existed for most participant-reported responses and conformed to threshold categories in dose-dependent ways. In contrast, no main effects of sensitivity threshold were observed for blinded observer ratings, physiological endpoints, or evoked analgesic responses, such that hydromorphone produced dose-dependent opioid agonist effects for all participants that diverged from their self-reported experience. These data provide the most granular assessment of inter-individual differences in opioid response among persons with little or no lifetime opioid exposure or existing pain condition. All participants experienced dose-dependent changes in opioid agonist responses, yet their self-awareness of these effects varied and 30 % of participants endorsed no awareness of opioid exposure at any dose. These data demonstrate a consistent and reliable divergence between the subjective experience of opioids from rigorously-assessed physiological, observable, and analgesic responses. Testable implications of these outcomes are discussed.
期刊介绍:
Drug and Alcohol Dependence is an international journal devoted to publishing original research, scholarly reviews, commentaries, and policy analyses in the area of drug, alcohol and tobacco use and dependence. Articles range from studies of the chemistry of substances of abuse, their actions at molecular and cellular sites, in vitro and in vivo investigations of their biochemical, pharmacological and behavioural actions, laboratory-based and clinical research in humans, substance abuse treatment and prevention research, and studies employing methods from epidemiology, sociology, and economics.