Validation of a simulator for oncoplastic breast conserving surgery

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Ejso Pub Date : 2025-03-07 DOI:10.1016/j.ejso.2025.109753
Laith O.K. Alghazawi , Stella Mavroveli , Eleni Anastasiou , Mohamed Attia , Natalie Johnson , Daniel Campioni-Norman , Dimitri Amiras , Andreas Ladas , Michael R. Boland , George Hanna , Paul TR. Thiruchelvam , Daniel R. Leff
{"title":"Validation of a simulator for oncoplastic breast conserving surgery","authors":"Laith O.K. Alghazawi ,&nbsp;Stella Mavroveli ,&nbsp;Eleni Anastasiou ,&nbsp;Mohamed Attia ,&nbsp;Natalie Johnson ,&nbsp;Daniel Campioni-Norman ,&nbsp;Dimitri Amiras ,&nbsp;Andreas Ladas ,&nbsp;Michael R. Boland ,&nbsp;George Hanna ,&nbsp;Paul TR. Thiruchelvam ,&nbsp;Daniel R. Leff","doi":"10.1016/j.ejso.2025.109753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Therapeutic Mammoplasty (TM) is increasingly becoming the standard of care, especially for patients with large tumor-to-breast volume ratios. The wider dissemination of oncoplastic skills warrants systems for the acquisition and assessment of safe skills. To date, TM simulations have not been developed for the acquisition or assessment of oncoplastic skills. This study aimed to design, develop, and validate a synthetic TM simulator for specialist surgical training and assessment.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A prospective, observational, and survey-based study. Breast surgeons collaborated with designers to construct a TM simulator. A modified Delphi approach was used to create a Competency Assessment Tool (CAT). Surgeons with varying operative experience performed simulated vertical scar TM. Procedures were videotaped (blinded, pseudo-anonymized), subsequently reviewed, and independently rated against CAT by three experts. Specimen radiographs and volumetric analysis were performed to assess specimen weight(g), volume(cm<sup>3</sup>), and adequacy of resection, derived as a percentage of deviation in uniformity around a 10 mm margin.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Thirty participants were recruited (10 consultants, 10 senior registrars (ST7-8), and 10 junior registrars (ST3-6)). Video-based rating scores (0-40) were significantly greater in consultants (median(IQR) = 34.0(30.5–38.0)) than in senior registrars (median(IQR) = 30.0(28.0–33.0)) and junior registrars (median(IQR) = 28.0(25.8–30.3)). The CAT scores varied significantly based on operator grade (p &lt; 0.05). The inter-rater reliability showed fair agreement (κ = 0.379). Specimens resected by consultants had significantly greater weight and volume (p &lt; 0.05). The consultants demonstrated the greatest uniformity in resection accuracy (p &lt; 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>A novel oncoplastic simulator was developed to practice and assess TM skills. Video-based ratings and end-product assessments differentiated experts from novice surgeons, suggesting construct validity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11522,"journal":{"name":"Ejso","volume":"51 7","pages":"Article 109753"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ejso","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748798325001817","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Therapeutic Mammoplasty (TM) is increasingly becoming the standard of care, especially for patients with large tumor-to-breast volume ratios. The wider dissemination of oncoplastic skills warrants systems for the acquisition and assessment of safe skills. To date, TM simulations have not been developed for the acquisition or assessment of oncoplastic skills. This study aimed to design, develop, and validate a synthetic TM simulator for specialist surgical training and assessment.

Methods

A prospective, observational, and survey-based study. Breast surgeons collaborated with designers to construct a TM simulator. A modified Delphi approach was used to create a Competency Assessment Tool (CAT). Surgeons with varying operative experience performed simulated vertical scar TM. Procedures were videotaped (blinded, pseudo-anonymized), subsequently reviewed, and independently rated against CAT by three experts. Specimen radiographs and volumetric analysis were performed to assess specimen weight(g), volume(cm3), and adequacy of resection, derived as a percentage of deviation in uniformity around a 10 mm margin.

Results

Thirty participants were recruited (10 consultants, 10 senior registrars (ST7-8), and 10 junior registrars (ST3-6)). Video-based rating scores (0-40) were significantly greater in consultants (median(IQR) = 34.0(30.5–38.0)) than in senior registrars (median(IQR) = 30.0(28.0–33.0)) and junior registrars (median(IQR) = 28.0(25.8–30.3)). The CAT scores varied significantly based on operator grade (p < 0.05). The inter-rater reliability showed fair agreement (κ = 0.379). Specimens resected by consultants had significantly greater weight and volume (p < 0.05). The consultants demonstrated the greatest uniformity in resection accuracy (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

A novel oncoplastic simulator was developed to practice and assess TM skills. Video-based ratings and end-product assessments differentiated experts from novice surgeons, suggesting construct validity.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ejso
Ejso 医学-外科
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1148
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: JSO - European Journal of Surgical Oncology ("the Journal of Cancer Surgery") is the Official Journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and BASO ~ the Association for Cancer Surgery. The EJSO aims to advance surgical oncology research and practice through the publication of original research articles, review articles, editorials, debates and correspondence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信