Andres Sutton , Adrian G. Fisher , David J. Eldridge , Graciela Metternicht
{"title":"Multi-temporal remote sensing of ground cover reveals beneficial effects of soil carbon farming in a semi-arid landscape","authors":"Andres Sutton , Adrian G. Fisher , David J. Eldridge , Graciela Metternicht","doi":"10.1016/j.compag.2025.110278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Sustainable land management practices are a strategic tool for addressing land degradation processes that threaten agroecosystem services supply. Currently, carbon credit schemes are important promoters of the adoption of such practices, yet their effectiveness on providing services other than carbon sequestration is not frequently assessed. Particularly, vegetation cover may not only be a mediator of CO<sub>2</sub> fixation, but also act as protection against soil erosion and prevent water quality deterioration. The overarching aim was to develop generalizable methods to assess the effectiveness of sustainable land management practices for maintaining agroecosystem integrity. To achieve this, we assessed the effect of soil carbon sequestration practices on remotely sensed groundcover levels and its stability, and on its response to short-term antecedent accumulated rainfall. These methods were tested in the Cowra Trough, an agricultural region of semi-arid New South Wales, Australia. Time series statistics (mean and standard deviation) and non-parametric tests were used to analyse temporal change in remotely sensed groundcover on paddocks undergoing different land management change intensities. This was complemented with a regional scale analysis of the effect of land use to contextualize paddock-scale results. Moreover, sequential linear regressions of remotely sensed vegetation cover response to antecedent rainfall through a moving temporal window were employed to assess trends in this relationship. A significant effect of land management change was demonstrated: over 90% of the sites implementing sustainable practices had increased and more stable ground cover levels, and the same number (though not the same sites) decreased their ground cover dependence on rainfall. The size of the effect was not related to the intensity of management change implemented for soil carbon sequestration. Land use type proved to be an important spatiotemporal predictor of ground cover and its stability at the Cowra Trough scale with cropping performing worse than grazing systems. Notably, the implementation of carbon farming practices was found to have a more prevalent positive impact on ground cover than on soil carbon contents, suggesting that such practices may provide co-benefits even when no carbon sequestration occurred. This study advances the possibility of monitoring agroecosystem multifunctionality and the development of integrative ‘payment for ecosystem services’ schemes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50627,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Electronics in Agriculture","volume":"234 ","pages":"Article 110278"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Electronics in Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168169925003849","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Sustainable land management practices are a strategic tool for addressing land degradation processes that threaten agroecosystem services supply. Currently, carbon credit schemes are important promoters of the adoption of such practices, yet their effectiveness on providing services other than carbon sequestration is not frequently assessed. Particularly, vegetation cover may not only be a mediator of CO2 fixation, but also act as protection against soil erosion and prevent water quality deterioration. The overarching aim was to develop generalizable methods to assess the effectiveness of sustainable land management practices for maintaining agroecosystem integrity. To achieve this, we assessed the effect of soil carbon sequestration practices on remotely sensed groundcover levels and its stability, and on its response to short-term antecedent accumulated rainfall. These methods were tested in the Cowra Trough, an agricultural region of semi-arid New South Wales, Australia. Time series statistics (mean and standard deviation) and non-parametric tests were used to analyse temporal change in remotely sensed groundcover on paddocks undergoing different land management change intensities. This was complemented with a regional scale analysis of the effect of land use to contextualize paddock-scale results. Moreover, sequential linear regressions of remotely sensed vegetation cover response to antecedent rainfall through a moving temporal window were employed to assess trends in this relationship. A significant effect of land management change was demonstrated: over 90% of the sites implementing sustainable practices had increased and more stable ground cover levels, and the same number (though not the same sites) decreased their ground cover dependence on rainfall. The size of the effect was not related to the intensity of management change implemented for soil carbon sequestration. Land use type proved to be an important spatiotemporal predictor of ground cover and its stability at the Cowra Trough scale with cropping performing worse than grazing systems. Notably, the implementation of carbon farming practices was found to have a more prevalent positive impact on ground cover than on soil carbon contents, suggesting that such practices may provide co-benefits even when no carbon sequestration occurred. This study advances the possibility of monitoring agroecosystem multifunctionality and the development of integrative ‘payment for ecosystem services’ schemes.
期刊介绍:
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture provides international coverage of advancements in computer hardware, software, electronic instrumentation, and control systems applied to agricultural challenges. Encompassing agronomy, horticulture, forestry, aquaculture, and animal farming, the journal publishes original papers, reviews, and applications notes. It explores the use of computers and electronics in plant or animal agricultural production, covering topics like agricultural soils, water, pests, controlled environments, and waste. The scope extends to on-farm post-harvest operations and relevant technologies, including artificial intelligence, sensors, machine vision, robotics, networking, and simulation modeling. Its companion journal, Smart Agricultural Technology, continues the focus on smart applications in production agriculture.