Investigating the evolutionary dynamics of second-line Mycobacterium tuberculosis drug resistance in Tanzania using hypercubic modelling and the Baum–Welch algorithm

IF 2.7 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Leonce Leandry , Egbert Mujuni , Eunice W. Mureithi , Morten Brun , Mary Mayige
{"title":"Investigating the evolutionary dynamics of second-line Mycobacterium tuberculosis drug resistance in Tanzania using hypercubic modelling and the Baum–Welch algorithm","authors":"Leonce Leandry ,&nbsp;Egbert Mujuni ,&nbsp;Eunice W. Mureithi ,&nbsp;Morten Brun ,&nbsp;Mary Mayige","doi":"10.1016/j.sciaf.2025.e02627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><em>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</em> (MTB) continues to pose a significant threat to public health, particularly with the emergence of drug-resistant strains. Research shows that first-line anti-tuberculosis drugs are increasingly failing, and second-line drugs are also showing resistance. This study investigates the evolutionary dynamics of second-line drugs used against MTB, specifically Bedaquiline, Delamanid, Linezolid, Clofazimine, and Levofloxacin. Data were collected from the Tanzania National Institute of Medical Research (NIMR) at the Central Tuberculosis Reference Laborator Muhimbili Centre (CTRL). The data were analysed using a 5-hypercubic model, with parameters estimated using the Baum–Welch algorithm. The findings show that the most probable drug-resistant acquisition, independent of other drugs analysed, is Bedaquiline with a probability of 0.8660 and Levofloxacin with a probability of 0.134. The evolutionary pattern begins with Bedaquiline, followed by Levofloxacin, then Clofazimine, and finally either Linezolid or Delamanid, each with an equal probability of occurring. This highlights the evolutionary patterns of drug resistance, providing insights that can inform health experts and policymakers in developing evidence-based, effective interventions to combat this growing public health challenge.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21690,"journal":{"name":"Scientific African","volume":"28 ","pages":"Article e02627"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific African","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468227625000973","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) continues to pose a significant threat to public health, particularly with the emergence of drug-resistant strains. Research shows that first-line anti-tuberculosis drugs are increasingly failing, and second-line drugs are also showing resistance. This study investigates the evolutionary dynamics of second-line drugs used against MTB, specifically Bedaquiline, Delamanid, Linezolid, Clofazimine, and Levofloxacin. Data were collected from the Tanzania National Institute of Medical Research (NIMR) at the Central Tuberculosis Reference Laborator Muhimbili Centre (CTRL). The data were analysed using a 5-hypercubic model, with parameters estimated using the Baum–Welch algorithm. The findings show that the most probable drug-resistant acquisition, independent of other drugs analysed, is Bedaquiline with a probability of 0.8660 and Levofloxacin with a probability of 0.134. The evolutionary pattern begins with Bedaquiline, followed by Levofloxacin, then Clofazimine, and finally either Linezolid or Delamanid, each with an equal probability of occurring. This highlights the evolutionary patterns of drug resistance, providing insights that can inform health experts and policymakers in developing evidence-based, effective interventions to combat this growing public health challenge.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scientific African
Scientific African Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
332
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信