4E performance evaluation of renewable microgrids: Comparing hydrogen and battery storage for nearly net zero energy buildings

IF 9.9 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Zahra Piryaei , Aslan Gholami , Majid Zandi
{"title":"4E performance evaluation of renewable microgrids: Comparing hydrogen and battery storage for nearly net zero energy buildings","authors":"Zahra Piryaei ,&nbsp;Aslan Gholami ,&nbsp;Majid Zandi","doi":"10.1016/j.enconman.2025.119711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Renewable microgrids and decentralized power generation have recently emerged as sustainable solutions for powering standalone nearly-net-zero buildings. This study proposed two photovoltaic-based microgrids: one with hydrogen energy storage and the other with battery energy storage, to supply the real-time energy needs for electrical appliances, heating, cooling, and hot water at a research office. Both systems are designed to achieve a levelized cost of energy of 0.78 EUR/kWh. Simulated using TRNSYS 18 software with a dynamic power load following model, the systems have been evaluated based on Energetic, Exergetic, Economic, and Environmental (4E) criteria over the first year of operation. The hydrogen-based system comprises a 13.1-kWp photovoltaic array, a 7-kW alkaline electrolyzer, and a 3.5-kW fuel cell. In contrast, the battery-based system includes a 150-kWh lead-acid battery. The hydrogen-based system fully meets the electrical demand with a loss of load probability of 0% and provides hot water through waste heat recovery from the fuel cell. The battery-based system, however, results in a loss of load probability of 4.34%. Both systems exhibit similar overall energy efficiencies but slightly different exergy efficiencies. The first system achieves 12.37% and 14.33%, respectively, while the second system achieves 12.28% and 20.8%. Despite the battery-based system having a higher energy dump, it boasts a greater round-trip efficiency of 90.23% compared to 46.86% for the hydrogen-based one. Both configurations avoid annual greenhouse gas emissions of about 8.5 tCO<sub>2</sub> eq. Therefore, they can be considered sustainable alternatives for cleaner energy production, significantly contributing to carbon footprint minimization.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11664,"journal":{"name":"Energy Conversion and Management","volume":"332 ","pages":"Article 119711"},"PeriodicalIF":9.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Conversion and Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196890425002341","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Renewable microgrids and decentralized power generation have recently emerged as sustainable solutions for powering standalone nearly-net-zero buildings. This study proposed two photovoltaic-based microgrids: one with hydrogen energy storage and the other with battery energy storage, to supply the real-time energy needs for electrical appliances, heating, cooling, and hot water at a research office. Both systems are designed to achieve a levelized cost of energy of 0.78 EUR/kWh. Simulated using TRNSYS 18 software with a dynamic power load following model, the systems have been evaluated based on Energetic, Exergetic, Economic, and Environmental (4E) criteria over the first year of operation. The hydrogen-based system comprises a 13.1-kWp photovoltaic array, a 7-kW alkaline electrolyzer, and a 3.5-kW fuel cell. In contrast, the battery-based system includes a 150-kWh lead-acid battery. The hydrogen-based system fully meets the electrical demand with a loss of load probability of 0% and provides hot water through waste heat recovery from the fuel cell. The battery-based system, however, results in a loss of load probability of 4.34%. Both systems exhibit similar overall energy efficiencies but slightly different exergy efficiencies. The first system achieves 12.37% and 14.33%, respectively, while the second system achieves 12.28% and 20.8%. Despite the battery-based system having a higher energy dump, it boasts a greater round-trip efficiency of 90.23% compared to 46.86% for the hydrogen-based one. Both configurations avoid annual greenhouse gas emissions of about 8.5 tCO2 eq. Therefore, they can be considered sustainable alternatives for cleaner energy production, significantly contributing to carbon footprint minimization.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Conversion and Management
Energy Conversion and Management 工程技术-力学
CiteScore
19.00
自引率
11.50%
发文量
1304
审稿时长
17 days
期刊介绍: The journal Energy Conversion and Management provides a forum for publishing original contributions and comprehensive technical review articles of interdisciplinary and original research on all important energy topics. The topics considered include energy generation, utilization, conversion, storage, transmission, conservation, management and sustainability. These topics typically involve various types of energy such as mechanical, thermal, nuclear, chemical, electromagnetic, magnetic and electric. These energy types cover all known energy resources, including renewable resources (e.g., solar, bio, hydro, wind, geothermal and ocean energy), fossil fuels and nuclear resources.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信