{"title":"4E performance evaluation of renewable microgrids: Comparing hydrogen and battery storage for nearly net zero energy buildings","authors":"Zahra Piryaei , Aslan Gholami , Majid Zandi","doi":"10.1016/j.enconman.2025.119711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Renewable microgrids and decentralized power generation have recently emerged as sustainable solutions for powering standalone nearly-net-zero buildings. This study proposed two photovoltaic-based microgrids: one with hydrogen energy storage and the other with battery energy storage, to supply the real-time energy needs for electrical appliances, heating, cooling, and hot water at a research office. Both systems are designed to achieve a levelized cost of energy of 0.78 EUR/kWh. Simulated using TRNSYS 18 software with a dynamic power load following model, the systems have been evaluated based on Energetic, Exergetic, Economic, and Environmental (4E) criteria over the first year of operation. The hydrogen-based system comprises a 13.1-kWp photovoltaic array, a 7-kW alkaline electrolyzer, and a 3.5-kW fuel cell. In contrast, the battery-based system includes a 150-kWh lead-acid battery. The hydrogen-based system fully meets the electrical demand with a loss of load probability of 0% and provides hot water through waste heat recovery from the fuel cell. The battery-based system, however, results in a loss of load probability of 4.34%. Both systems exhibit similar overall energy efficiencies but slightly different exergy efficiencies. The first system achieves 12.37% and 14.33%, respectively, while the second system achieves 12.28% and 20.8%. Despite the battery-based system having a higher energy dump, it boasts a greater round-trip efficiency of 90.23% compared to 46.86% for the hydrogen-based one. Both configurations avoid annual greenhouse gas emissions of about 8.5 tCO<sub>2</sub> eq. Therefore, they can be considered sustainable alternatives for cleaner energy production, significantly contributing to carbon footprint minimization.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11664,"journal":{"name":"Energy Conversion and Management","volume":"332 ","pages":"Article 119711"},"PeriodicalIF":9.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Conversion and Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196890425002341","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Renewable microgrids and decentralized power generation have recently emerged as sustainable solutions for powering standalone nearly-net-zero buildings. This study proposed two photovoltaic-based microgrids: one with hydrogen energy storage and the other with battery energy storage, to supply the real-time energy needs for electrical appliances, heating, cooling, and hot water at a research office. Both systems are designed to achieve a levelized cost of energy of 0.78 EUR/kWh. Simulated using TRNSYS 18 software with a dynamic power load following model, the systems have been evaluated based on Energetic, Exergetic, Economic, and Environmental (4E) criteria over the first year of operation. The hydrogen-based system comprises a 13.1-kWp photovoltaic array, a 7-kW alkaline electrolyzer, and a 3.5-kW fuel cell. In contrast, the battery-based system includes a 150-kWh lead-acid battery. The hydrogen-based system fully meets the electrical demand with a loss of load probability of 0% and provides hot water through waste heat recovery from the fuel cell. The battery-based system, however, results in a loss of load probability of 4.34%. Both systems exhibit similar overall energy efficiencies but slightly different exergy efficiencies. The first system achieves 12.37% and 14.33%, respectively, while the second system achieves 12.28% and 20.8%. Despite the battery-based system having a higher energy dump, it boasts a greater round-trip efficiency of 90.23% compared to 46.86% for the hydrogen-based one. Both configurations avoid annual greenhouse gas emissions of about 8.5 tCO2 eq. Therefore, they can be considered sustainable alternatives for cleaner energy production, significantly contributing to carbon footprint minimization.
期刊介绍:
The journal Energy Conversion and Management provides a forum for publishing original contributions and comprehensive technical review articles of interdisciplinary and original research on all important energy topics.
The topics considered include energy generation, utilization, conversion, storage, transmission, conservation, management and sustainability. These topics typically involve various types of energy such as mechanical, thermal, nuclear, chemical, electromagnetic, magnetic and electric. These energy types cover all known energy resources, including renewable resources (e.g., solar, bio, hydro, wind, geothermal and ocean energy), fossil fuels and nuclear resources.