Coupled SWMM-MOEA/D for multi-objective optimization of low impact development in urban stormwater systems

IF 5.9 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Kazem Javan , Saeed Banihashemi , Amirhossein Nazari , Abbas Roozbahani , Mariam Darestani , Hanieh Hossieni
{"title":"Coupled SWMM-MOEA/D for multi-objective optimization of low impact development in urban stormwater systems","authors":"Kazem Javan ,&nbsp;Saeed Banihashemi ,&nbsp;Amirhossein Nazari ,&nbsp;Abbas Roozbahani ,&nbsp;Mariam Darestani ,&nbsp;Hanieh Hossieni","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.133044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The escalating challenge of unsustainable urban development worldwide has precipitated changes in land usage, contributing to increased impermeability of the urban landscape. This phenomenon exacerbates urban runoff, a critical environmental concern. In response, Low Impact Development (LID) techniques, recognized for their environmental efficacy, have emerged as pivotal in mitigating urban runoff. However, transforming the hydrological dynamics of urban watersheds into a more sustainable state necessitates substantial financial commitments from relevant authorities. Consequently, strategic LID planning becomes essential to maximize effectiveness while minimizing costs. This research introduces a novel, hybrid modeling strategy that integrates the Storm Water Management Model (SWMM) with the Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm by Decomposition (MOEA/D) optimization algorithm. This approach aims to concurrently minimize runoff volume, peak flow rate, and implementation expenses. Focusing on a segment of Tehran Municipality’s urban stormwater system in District 11, the study evaluates four distinct LID scenarios. These scenarios encompass various configurations of Rain Barrels (RB), Bioretention Cells (BC), Green Roofs (GR), and Porous Pavements (PP). Utilizing the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method for comparative analysis, the study results identify the most efficacious scenario, S2_1, including RB and BC, which achieves a 19.34% reduction in runoff volume and a 46.53 % decrease in peak flow rate, all at the implementation cost of 123,169 USD. A close second, scenario S3_1 incorporating RB and PP, demonstrates a 17 % and 46.55 % reduction in runoff volume and peak flow at an expenditure of 107,017 USD, respectively. The proposed SWMM-MOEA/D model, in conjunction with TOPSIS, presents a valuable tool for LID planning and optimization, offering decision-makers and relevant entities a pragmatic approach to address the challenges of urban runoff management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology","volume":"656 ","pages":"Article 133044"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169425003828","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The escalating challenge of unsustainable urban development worldwide has precipitated changes in land usage, contributing to increased impermeability of the urban landscape. This phenomenon exacerbates urban runoff, a critical environmental concern. In response, Low Impact Development (LID) techniques, recognized for their environmental efficacy, have emerged as pivotal in mitigating urban runoff. However, transforming the hydrological dynamics of urban watersheds into a more sustainable state necessitates substantial financial commitments from relevant authorities. Consequently, strategic LID planning becomes essential to maximize effectiveness while minimizing costs. This research introduces a novel, hybrid modeling strategy that integrates the Storm Water Management Model (SWMM) with the Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm by Decomposition (MOEA/D) optimization algorithm. This approach aims to concurrently minimize runoff volume, peak flow rate, and implementation expenses. Focusing on a segment of Tehran Municipality’s urban stormwater system in District 11, the study evaluates four distinct LID scenarios. These scenarios encompass various configurations of Rain Barrels (RB), Bioretention Cells (BC), Green Roofs (GR), and Porous Pavements (PP). Utilizing the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method for comparative analysis, the study results identify the most efficacious scenario, S2_1, including RB and BC, which achieves a 19.34% reduction in runoff volume and a 46.53 % decrease in peak flow rate, all at the implementation cost of 123,169 USD. A close second, scenario S3_1 incorporating RB and PP, demonstrates a 17 % and 46.55 % reduction in runoff volume and peak flow at an expenditure of 107,017 USD, respectively. The proposed SWMM-MOEA/D model, in conjunction with TOPSIS, presents a valuable tool for LID planning and optimization, offering decision-makers and relevant entities a pragmatic approach to address the challenges of urban runoff management.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Hydrology
Journal of Hydrology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
1309
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hydrology publishes original research papers and comprehensive reviews in all the subfields of the hydrological sciences including water based management and policy issues that impact on economics and society. These comprise, but are not limited to the physical, chemical, biogeochemical, stochastic and systems aspects of surface and groundwater hydrology, hydrometeorology and hydrogeology. Relevant topics incorporating the insights and methodologies of disciplines such as climatology, water resource systems, hydraulics, agrohydrology, geomorphology, soil science, instrumentation and remote sensing, civil and environmental engineering are included. Social science perspectives on hydrological problems such as resource and ecological economics, environmental sociology, psychology and behavioural science, management and policy analysis are also invited. Multi-and interdisciplinary analyses of hydrological problems are within scope. The science published in the Journal of Hydrology is relevant to catchment scales rather than exclusively to a local scale or site.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信