A novel allele of B(A) blood group detected in a donor and a patient during a retrospective review of ABO group anomalies in a tertiary hospital

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 HEMATOLOGY
Kanyapon Suksard , Glenda M. Millard , Usana Teravichitchainan , Parichart Permpikul , Janejira Kittivorapart
{"title":"A novel allele of B(A) blood group detected in a donor and a patient during a retrospective review of ABO group anomalies in a tertiary hospital","authors":"Kanyapon Suksard ,&nbsp;Glenda M. Millard ,&nbsp;Usana Teravichitchainan ,&nbsp;Parichart Permpikul ,&nbsp;Janejira Kittivorapart","doi":"10.1016/j.transci.2025.104108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>ABO discrepancies, inconclusive results between forward and reverse typing, are one of the significant challenges encountered in transfusion medicine. Their frequency and etiologies can vary among ethnicities. This study aimed to characterize ABO discrepancies in a Thai population.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a retrospective review of 285,450 donor and 258,780 patient samples for ABO discrepancies, which were categorized into five groups, as described below. The serological ABO grouping was performed using an automated system, and further serological techniques were used in the discrepancy cases. Additionally, sequencing was used to examine the genetic background of the B(A) phenotype detected during the retrospective review.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>ABO discrepancies were identified in 396 patients (0.15 %) and 74 blood donors (0.03 %). Among the patients, the most frequent cause was ABO mismatch stem cell transplantation (198; 50 %). The remaining 198 discrepancy cases (198/258,780; 0.08 %) were categorized into five groups: weak/missing red cell reactivity, extra red cell reactivity, mixed-field, weak/missing serum reactivity, and extra serum reactivity, accounting for 17.17 %, 0.51 %, 29.29 %, 28.79 %, and 24.24 %, respectively. For the blood donors, the percentages were 48.65 %, 2.70 %, 2.70 %, 37.84 %, and 8.11 %, respectively. We also identified the B(A) phenotype in one patient and two blood donors. The sequencing study identified allele variants of c.467 C&gt;T, c.796 C&gt;A, c.803 G&gt;C, and c.930 G&gt;A in exon 7, which was a novel allele.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>ABO discrepancies were distinct between donors and patients even in the same ethnicity. This finding highlighted the influence of the patient’s conditions and therapy on the anomalous ABO typing. Additionally, the B(A) individuals identified in this study carried identical genetic alterations that differed from all antecedent alleles of the B(A) phenotype.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49422,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion and Apheresis Science","volume":"64 3","pages":"Article 104108"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion and Apheresis Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1473050225000424","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

ABO discrepancies, inconclusive results between forward and reverse typing, are one of the significant challenges encountered in transfusion medicine. Their frequency and etiologies can vary among ethnicities. This study aimed to characterize ABO discrepancies in a Thai population.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective review of 285,450 donor and 258,780 patient samples for ABO discrepancies, which were categorized into five groups, as described below. The serological ABO grouping was performed using an automated system, and further serological techniques were used in the discrepancy cases. Additionally, sequencing was used to examine the genetic background of the B(A) phenotype detected during the retrospective review.

Results

ABO discrepancies were identified in 396 patients (0.15 %) and 74 blood donors (0.03 %). Among the patients, the most frequent cause was ABO mismatch stem cell transplantation (198; 50 %). The remaining 198 discrepancy cases (198/258,780; 0.08 %) were categorized into five groups: weak/missing red cell reactivity, extra red cell reactivity, mixed-field, weak/missing serum reactivity, and extra serum reactivity, accounting for 17.17 %, 0.51 %, 29.29 %, 28.79 %, and 24.24 %, respectively. For the blood donors, the percentages were 48.65 %, 2.70 %, 2.70 %, 37.84 %, and 8.11 %, respectively. We also identified the B(A) phenotype in one patient and two blood donors. The sequencing study identified allele variants of c.467 C>T, c.796 C>A, c.803 G>C, and c.930 G>A in exon 7, which was a novel allele.

Conclusion

ABO discrepancies were distinct between donors and patients even in the same ethnicity. This finding highlighted the influence of the patient’s conditions and therapy on the anomalous ABO typing. Additionally, the B(A) individuals identified in this study carried identical genetic alterations that differed from all antecedent alleles of the B(A) phenotype.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.30%
发文量
181
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Transfusion and Apheresis Science brings comprehensive and up-to-date information to physicians and health care professionals involved in the rapidly changing fields of transfusion medicine, hemostasis and apheresis. The journal presents original articles relating to scientific and clinical studies in the areas of immunohematology, transfusion practice, bleeding and thrombotic disorders and both therapeutic and donor apheresis including hematopoietic stem cells. Topics covered include the collection and processing of blood, compatibility testing and guidelines for the use of blood products, as well as screening for and transmission of blood-borne diseases. All areas of apheresis - therapeutic and collection - are also addressed. We would like to specifically encourage allied health professionals in this area to submit manuscripts that relate to improved patient and donor care, technical aspects and educational issues. Transfusion and Apheresis Science features a "Theme" section which includes, in each issue, a group of papers designed to review a specific topic of current importance in transfusion and hemostasis for the discussion of topical issues specific to apheresis and focuses on the operators'' viewpoint. Another section is "What''s Happening" which provides informal reporting of activities in the field. In addition, brief case reports and Letters to the Editor, as well as reviews of meetings and events of general interest, and a listing of recent patents make the journal a complete source of information for practitioners of transfusion, hemostasis and apheresis science. Immediate dissemination of important information is ensured by the commitment of Transfusion and Apheresis Science to rapid publication of both symposia and submitted papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信