Cristiano Pedroso-Roussado , Klaas Kuitenbrouwer , Vera Fearns , Mariana Pestana , Valentina Nisi , Ann Light , Nuno Jardim Nunes
{"title":"Zoöp Futures: Towards an organisational framework for ecological cooperation between humans and more-than-humans","authors":"Cristiano Pedroso-Roussado , Klaas Kuitenbrouwer , Vera Fearns , Mariana Pestana , Valentina Nisi , Ann Light , Nuno Jardim Nunes","doi":"10.1016/j.futures.2025.103584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper describes the Zoöp model, an organisational framework fostering regenerative relationships between humans and nonhumans. With escalating ecological crises, traditional anthropocentric decision-making requires a shift towards equitable, multispecies collaboration. The Zoöp model translates more-than-human theories into practical organisational strategies for sustainable futures. Using the Het Nieuwe Instituut (HNI) as a case study, this paper examines how the Zoöp model fosters regenerative actions within a European cultural institution. The model constructs participatory futures, embedding multispecies interests directly into organisational processes to address gaps in current sustainability efforts. By bridging organisational theory, environmental sustainability, and futures studies, the Zoöp model advocates for reparative, just systems that prioritise ecological health and multispecies well-being. This paper highlights the model's potential to promote a philosophical shift, recognising the intrinsic value of all living beings in decision-making processes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48239,"journal":{"name":"Futures","volume":"169 ","pages":"Article 103584"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Futures","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016328725000461","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper describes the Zoöp model, an organisational framework fostering regenerative relationships between humans and nonhumans. With escalating ecological crises, traditional anthropocentric decision-making requires a shift towards equitable, multispecies collaboration. The Zoöp model translates more-than-human theories into practical organisational strategies for sustainable futures. Using the Het Nieuwe Instituut (HNI) as a case study, this paper examines how the Zoöp model fosters regenerative actions within a European cultural institution. The model constructs participatory futures, embedding multispecies interests directly into organisational processes to address gaps in current sustainability efforts. By bridging organisational theory, environmental sustainability, and futures studies, the Zoöp model advocates for reparative, just systems that prioritise ecological health and multispecies well-being. This paper highlights the model's potential to promote a philosophical shift, recognising the intrinsic value of all living beings in decision-making processes.
本文描述了Zoöp模型,这是一个促进人类和非人类之间再生关系的组织框架。随着生态危机的升级,传统的以人类为中心的决策需要向公平、多物种合作的方向转变。Zoöp模型将超越人类的理论转化为可持续未来的实际组织战略。本文以Het Nieuwe Instituut (HNI)为例,探讨了Zoöp模式如何在欧洲文化机构内促进再生行动。该模型构建了参与式未来,将多物种利益直接嵌入到组织流程中,以解决当前可持续性努力中的差距。通过连接组织理论、环境可持续性和未来研究,Zoöp模型倡导优先考虑生态健康和多物种福祉的修复性公正系统。本文强调了该模型促进哲学转变的潜力,认识到所有生物在决策过程中的内在价值。
期刊介绍:
Futures is an international, refereed, multidisciplinary journal concerned with medium and long-term futures of cultures and societies, science and technology, economics and politics, environment and the planet and individuals and humanity. Covering methods and practices of futures studies, the journal seeks to examine possible and alternative futures of all human endeavours. Futures seeks to promote divergent and pluralistic visions, ideas and opinions about the future. The editors do not necessarily agree with the views expressed in the pages of Futures