Agricultural commercialization and food security: Evidence and policy implications for smallholder farmers in Kenya

Emily Mutea , Johanna Jacobi , Stephan Rist , Boniface Kiteme , Md Sarwar Hossain
{"title":"Agricultural commercialization and food security: Evidence and policy implications for smallholder farmers in Kenya","authors":"Emily Mutea ,&nbsp;Johanna Jacobi ,&nbsp;Stephan Rist ,&nbsp;Boniface Kiteme ,&nbsp;Md Sarwar Hossain","doi":"10.1016/j.wds.2025.100214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates the relationship between agricultural commercialization and food security among smallholder farmers in Kenya, integrating the Market Structure, Conduct, and Performance (SCP) paradigm with peasant economic theory. Using mixed methods (household survey, participant observations, and expert interviews), we compare the degrees of commercialization between food secure and food insecure households in a rural area of Kenya. Contrary to the assumption that commercialization enhances food security, our findings reveal a more complex reality. Food insecure households exhibit higher overall commercialization indices but face significant challenges, including limited access to resources, market imperfections, and a risk-averse nature prioritizing subsistence over profit maximization. The study highlights the importance of market structure and conduct in shaping food security outcomes. Factors such as farm size, crop diversity, and barriers to market entry are crucial. Food secure households benefit from larger landholdings, diversified crops, and better access to markets and inputs, leading to higher productivity and more stable food supplies. In contrast, food insecure households struggle with smaller landholdings, less diversification, and greater reliance on local markets, making them more vulnerable to food insecurity. Our research underscores the need for a holistic approach to agricultural commercialization that addresses structural issues and provides comprehensive support to smallholder farmers. Policy recommendations include strengthening property rights, improving rural infrastructure, promoting sustainable agricultural practices, and implementing social safety nets. By creating an enabling environment that supports the diverse needs of smallholder farmers, policymakers can enhance food security and promote sustainable agricultural development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101285,"journal":{"name":"World Development Sustainability","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100214"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Development Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772655X25000138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the relationship between agricultural commercialization and food security among smallholder farmers in Kenya, integrating the Market Structure, Conduct, and Performance (SCP) paradigm with peasant economic theory. Using mixed methods (household survey, participant observations, and expert interviews), we compare the degrees of commercialization between food secure and food insecure households in a rural area of Kenya. Contrary to the assumption that commercialization enhances food security, our findings reveal a more complex reality. Food insecure households exhibit higher overall commercialization indices but face significant challenges, including limited access to resources, market imperfections, and a risk-averse nature prioritizing subsistence over profit maximization. The study highlights the importance of market structure and conduct in shaping food security outcomes. Factors such as farm size, crop diversity, and barriers to market entry are crucial. Food secure households benefit from larger landholdings, diversified crops, and better access to markets and inputs, leading to higher productivity and more stable food supplies. In contrast, food insecure households struggle with smaller landholdings, less diversification, and greater reliance on local markets, making them more vulnerable to food insecurity. Our research underscores the need for a holistic approach to agricultural commercialization that addresses structural issues and provides comprehensive support to smallholder farmers. Policy recommendations include strengthening property rights, improving rural infrastructure, promoting sustainable agricultural practices, and implementing social safety nets. By creating an enabling environment that supports the diverse needs of smallholder farmers, policymakers can enhance food security and promote sustainable agricultural development.
农业商业化和粮食安全:对肯尼亚小农的证据和政策影响
本研究将市场结构、行为和绩效(SCP)范式与农民经济理论相结合,探讨了肯尼亚小农农业商业化与粮食安全之间的关系。采用混合方法(家庭调查、参与者观察和专家访谈),我们比较了肯尼亚农村地区粮食安全家庭和粮食不安全家庭之间的商业化程度。与商业化提高粮食安全的假设相反,我们的研究结果揭示了一个更复杂的现实。粮食不安全家庭的整体商业化指数较高,但面临着重大挑战,包括获取资源的机会有限、市场不完善以及将维持生计置于利润最大化之上的规避风险天性。该研究强调了市场结构和行为在形成粮食安全成果方面的重要性。农场规模、作物多样性和市场准入壁垒等因素至关重要。粮食安全家庭受益于更大的土地拥有量、多样化的作物以及更好的市场准入和投入,从而提高生产力和更稳定的粮食供应。相比之下,粮食不安全家庭的土地拥有量较小,多样化程度较低,更依赖当地市场,使他们更容易受到粮食不安全的影响。我们的研究强调,需要一种全面的方法来解决农业商业化的结构性问题,并为小农提供全面的支持。政策建议包括加强产权、改善农村基础设施、促进可持续农业实践和实施社会安全网。通过创造一个支持小农多样化需求的有利环境,政策制定者可以加强粮食安全和促进可持续农业发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信