The effect of isolated tumor cells on adjuvant treatment decisions for patients with endometrial cancer: A retrospective case series

IF 1.2 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Camryn Kenkel , Sarah S. Lee , Naaman Mehta , Jude Nawlo , Edward Jimenez , Leslie R. Boyd
{"title":"The effect of isolated tumor cells on adjuvant treatment decisions for patients with endometrial cancer: A retrospective case series","authors":"Camryn Kenkel ,&nbsp;Sarah S. Lee ,&nbsp;Naaman Mehta ,&nbsp;Jude Nawlo ,&nbsp;Edward Jimenez ,&nbsp;Leslie R. Boyd","doi":"10.1016/j.gore.2025.101713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for endometrial cancer staging may identify isolated tumor cells (ITCs). Although guidelines do not classify nodes with ITCs as positive, earlier papers reported that a significant proportion of gynecologic oncologists treat ITCs as they would positive nodes. The objective of this study was to examine practice patterns and determine if the presence of ITCs in endometrial cancer affects adjuvant treatment decision-making.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a retrospective series of patients with endometrial adenocarcinoma stages I to IIIB who underwent surgical staging with SNLB from July 2016 to January 2022 at three hospitals. The primary outcome of interest was the receipt of adjuvant treatment. Chi-square, Mann-Whitney <em>U</em> test, and logistic regression were used with significance set at p &lt; 0.05.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of seven hundred thirty-four patients included, ITCs were identified in 41 patients (5.6 %). Deep myometrial invasion (61.0 % vs 20.5 %, p &lt; 0.001) and lymphovascular invasion (58.4 % vs 17.7 %, p &lt; 0.001) were more common in patients with ITCs than in those with negative lymph nodes. Patients with ITCs were more likely to receive adjuvant treatment (30 of 41, 73.2 % vs 289 of 693, 41.7 %, p &lt; 0.001). When controlling for age, stage, histology, grade, and lymphovascular space invasion, ITCs were not associated with an increased likelihood of adjuvant therapy receipt.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Although patients with ITCs were more likely to receive adjuvant treatment, this was accounted for by other clinical and histological factors. Clinicians were likely to make decisions based on established risk factors, and more data are needed on the role of ITCs in the landscape of molecularly based decision making.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12873,"journal":{"name":"Gynecologic Oncology Reports","volume":"58 ","pages":"Article 101713"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecologic Oncology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352578925000384","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for endometrial cancer staging may identify isolated tumor cells (ITCs). Although guidelines do not classify nodes with ITCs as positive, earlier papers reported that a significant proportion of gynecologic oncologists treat ITCs as they would positive nodes. The objective of this study was to examine practice patterns and determine if the presence of ITCs in endometrial cancer affects adjuvant treatment decision-making.

Methods

This was a retrospective series of patients with endometrial adenocarcinoma stages I to IIIB who underwent surgical staging with SNLB from July 2016 to January 2022 at three hospitals. The primary outcome of interest was the receipt of adjuvant treatment. Chi-square, Mann-Whitney U test, and logistic regression were used with significance set at p < 0.05.

Results

Of seven hundred thirty-four patients included, ITCs were identified in 41 patients (5.6 %). Deep myometrial invasion (61.0 % vs 20.5 %, p < 0.001) and lymphovascular invasion (58.4 % vs 17.7 %, p < 0.001) were more common in patients with ITCs than in those with negative lymph nodes. Patients with ITCs were more likely to receive adjuvant treatment (30 of 41, 73.2 % vs 289 of 693, 41.7 %, p < 0.001). When controlling for age, stage, histology, grade, and lymphovascular space invasion, ITCs were not associated with an increased likelihood of adjuvant therapy receipt.

Conclusions

Although patients with ITCs were more likely to receive adjuvant treatment, this was accounted for by other clinical and histological factors. Clinicians were likely to make decisions based on established risk factors, and more data are needed on the role of ITCs in the landscape of molecularly based decision making.
分离肿瘤细胞对子宫内膜癌患者辅助治疗决策的影响:回顾性病例系列
目的子宫内膜癌分期的网膜淋巴结活检(SLNB)可以识别分离的肿瘤细胞(ITCs)。尽管指南没有将伴有ITCs的淋巴结分类为阳性,但早期的论文报道,相当比例的妇科肿瘤学家将ITCs视为阳性淋巴结。本研究的目的是检查实践模式,并确定子宫内膜癌中ITCs的存在是否影响辅助治疗决策。方法回顾性分析2016年7月至2022年1月在三家医院接受手术分期的子宫内膜腺癌I至IIIB期患者。主要关注的结局是接受辅助治疗。采用卡方检验、Mann-Whitney U检验和logistic回归,显著性设置为p <;0.05.结果纳入的734例患者中,41例(5.6%)发现ITCs。深肌层浸润(61.0% vs 20.5%, p <;0.001)和淋巴血管侵犯(58.4% vs 17.7%, p <;0.001)在ITCs患者中比在淋巴结阴性患者中更常见。ITCs患者更有可能接受辅助治疗(41例中有30例,73.2% vs 693例中有289例,41.7%,p <;0.001)。在控制年龄、分期、组织学、分级和淋巴血管间隙浸润的情况下,ITCs与接受辅助治疗的可能性增加无关。结论虽然ITCs患者更容易接受辅助治疗,但这与其他临床和组织学因素有关。临床医生可能会根据已确定的风险因素做出决定,需要更多的数据来了解ITCs在基于分子的决策中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gynecologic Oncology Reports
Gynecologic Oncology Reports OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
183
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Gynecologic Oncology Reports is an online-only, open access journal devoted to the rapid publication of narrative review articles, survey articles, case reports, case series, letters to the editor regarding previously published manuscripts and other short communications in the field of gynecologic oncology. The journal will consider papers that concern tumors of the female reproductive tract, with originality, quality, and clarity the chief criteria of acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信