Generative AI for vaccine misbelief correction: Insights from targeting extraversion and pseudoscientific beliefs

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Hang Lu
{"title":"Generative AI for vaccine misbelief correction: Insights from targeting extraversion and pseudoscientific beliefs","authors":"Hang Lu","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.127018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Misinformation about vaccines is a significant barrier to public health, fueling hesitancy and resistance. Generative AI offers a scalable tool for assisting public health communicators in crafting targeted correction messages tailored to audience characteristics. This study investigates the effectiveness of AI-generated messages targeting extraversion and pseudoscientific beliefs compared to high-quality generic and non-vaccine-related messages.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>In a between-subjects experiment, 1435 U.S. adults were randomly assigned to one of four conditions: control, generic correction, extraversion-targeting correction, or pseudoscientific-belief-targeting correction. Participants rated their agreement with vaccine misbelief statements before and after exposure to a correction message. AI was used to generate the targeted correction messages, while the generic and control messages were sourced from real-world examples.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Extraversion-targeting messages significantly reduced vaccine misbeliefs, performing comparably to high-quality generic messages, particularly among participants with higher extraversion levels. However, these effects did not extend to general vaccination attitudes. Pseudoscientific-belief-targeting messages were ineffective and, in some cases, backfired, reinforcing negative attitudes among individuals with strong pseudoscientific beliefs.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study demonstrates the potential of AI-assisted message generation for crafting effective correction messages, particularly when targeting personality traits like extraversion. However, the findings suggest that certain AI-generated messages may be less effective or even counterproductive when targeting entrenched beliefs, underscoring the need for human oversight in refining AI-generated messages. Future research should explore additional audience characteristics and optimize human-AI collaboration to enhance the effectiveness of AI-generated correction messages in public health communication.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23491,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":"54 ","pages":"Article 127018"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X25003159","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Misinformation about vaccines is a significant barrier to public health, fueling hesitancy and resistance. Generative AI offers a scalable tool for assisting public health communicators in crafting targeted correction messages tailored to audience characteristics. This study investigates the effectiveness of AI-generated messages targeting extraversion and pseudoscientific beliefs compared to high-quality generic and non-vaccine-related messages.

Method

In a between-subjects experiment, 1435 U.S. adults were randomly assigned to one of four conditions: control, generic correction, extraversion-targeting correction, or pseudoscientific-belief-targeting correction. Participants rated their agreement with vaccine misbelief statements before and after exposure to a correction message. AI was used to generate the targeted correction messages, while the generic and control messages were sourced from real-world examples.

Results

Extraversion-targeting messages significantly reduced vaccine misbeliefs, performing comparably to high-quality generic messages, particularly among participants with higher extraversion levels. However, these effects did not extend to general vaccination attitudes. Pseudoscientific-belief-targeting messages were ineffective and, in some cases, backfired, reinforcing negative attitudes among individuals with strong pseudoscientific beliefs.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates the potential of AI-assisted message generation for crafting effective correction messages, particularly when targeting personality traits like extraversion. However, the findings suggest that certain AI-generated messages may be less effective or even counterproductive when targeting entrenched beliefs, underscoring the need for human oversight in refining AI-generated messages. Future research should explore additional audience characteristics and optimize human-AI collaboration to enhance the effectiveness of AI-generated correction messages in public health communication.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Vaccine
Vaccine 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
5.50%
发文量
992
审稿时长
131 days
期刊介绍: Vaccine is unique in publishing the highest quality science across all disciplines relevant to the field of vaccinology - all original article submissions across basic and clinical research, vaccine manufacturing, history, public policy, behavioral science and ethics, social sciences, safety, and many other related areas are welcomed. The submission categories as given in the Guide for Authors indicate where we receive the most papers. Papers outside these major areas are also welcome and authors are encouraged to contact us with specific questions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信