Boya Mi , Ying Jin , Meichun Zheng , Hongtao Cheng , June Zhang
{"title":"Stigma, colorectal cancer knowledge and self-efficacy among colorectal cancer survivors: A cross-sectional study based on random forest analysis","authors":"Boya Mi , Ying Jin , Meichun Zheng , Hongtao Cheng , June Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.ejon.2025.102858","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To assess the stigma levels among colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors, identify determinants, examine correlations with CRC knowledge and self-efficacy, and quantify the relative influence of various contributing factors.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In total, 301 CRC survivors were enrolled from a tertiary oncology center in southern China. The participants completed the Social Impact Scale (SIS), Bowel Cancer Awareness Measure (Bowel CAM), General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES), and a demographic and disease-related questionnaire. The analytical framework included multiple linear regression to identify the factors influencing stigma, LASSO regression for variable refinement, and random forest modeling to construct hierarchies of factor importance.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Participants demonstrated moderate levels across all measures: stigma (54.63 ± 8.37), CRC knowledge (8.25 ± 4.74), and self-efficacy (26.81 ± 5.95). Multiple linear regression identified type of medical insurance, support from peers, unwillingness to accept colonoscopy, CRC knowledge, and self-efficacy as significant factors influencing stigma. Random forest analysis ranked factor importance by Gini index: self-efficacy (4366.41), support from peers (1618.03), CRC knowledge (1029.04), type of medical insurance (886.66), and unwillingness to accept colonoscopy (750.16).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Healthcare providers should pay more attention to stigma among CRC patients. Effective stigma reduction necessitates culturally-sensitive psychosocial interventions, including enhancing patients’ confidence in managing their disease, strengthening professional-driven online popularization of science campaigns, and facilitating social support networks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51048,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Oncology Nursing","volume":"76 ","pages":"Article 102858"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Oncology Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462388925000821","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
To assess the stigma levels among colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors, identify determinants, examine correlations with CRC knowledge and self-efficacy, and quantify the relative influence of various contributing factors.
Methods
In total, 301 CRC survivors were enrolled from a tertiary oncology center in southern China. The participants completed the Social Impact Scale (SIS), Bowel Cancer Awareness Measure (Bowel CAM), General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES), and a demographic and disease-related questionnaire. The analytical framework included multiple linear regression to identify the factors influencing stigma, LASSO regression for variable refinement, and random forest modeling to construct hierarchies of factor importance.
Results
Participants demonstrated moderate levels across all measures: stigma (54.63 ± 8.37), CRC knowledge (8.25 ± 4.74), and self-efficacy (26.81 ± 5.95). Multiple linear regression identified type of medical insurance, support from peers, unwillingness to accept colonoscopy, CRC knowledge, and self-efficacy as significant factors influencing stigma. Random forest analysis ranked factor importance by Gini index: self-efficacy (4366.41), support from peers (1618.03), CRC knowledge (1029.04), type of medical insurance (886.66), and unwillingness to accept colonoscopy (750.16).
Conclusions
Healthcare providers should pay more attention to stigma among CRC patients. Effective stigma reduction necessitates culturally-sensitive psychosocial interventions, including enhancing patients’ confidence in managing their disease, strengthening professional-driven online popularization of science campaigns, and facilitating social support networks.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Oncology Nursing is an international journal which publishes research of direct relevance to patient care, nurse education, management and policy development. EJON is proud to be the official journal of the European Oncology Nursing Society.
The journal publishes the following types of papers:
• Original research articles
• Review articles