Mohammad Hamza Bajwa , Nowal Hussain , Muhammad Waqas Saeed Baqai , Faiza Urooj , Unaiza Naeem , Syed Hasan Shuja , Ali Hyder Nazeer , Ahsan Ali Khan , Syed Ather Enam , Saqib Kamran Bakhshi
{"title":"Awake craniotomy versus general anesthesia for resection of intra-axial brain tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Mohammad Hamza Bajwa , Nowal Hussain , Muhammad Waqas Saeed Baqai , Faiza Urooj , Unaiza Naeem , Syed Hasan Shuja , Ali Hyder Nazeer , Ahsan Ali Khan , Syed Ather Enam , Saqib Kamran Bakhshi","doi":"10.1016/j.inat.2025.102007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Awake craniotomy (AC) for intra-axial brain tumors is useful for preserving cortical and subcortical white matter tracts that may have tumor invasion. No specific guideline or concrete evidence exists regarding the superiority of AC over surgery under general anesthesia (GA), with many surgeons preferring resection under GA for benefits of potentially better extent of resection.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic review and <em>meta</em>-analysis was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and registered on PROSPERO(CRD42022311131). A comprehensive search was conducted using specific keywords and MeSH terms with Boolean operators, from PubMED and Cochrane databases. Pooled effect size was estimated using a Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model, with evaluation of heterogeneity using Higgins <em>I<sup>2</sup></em> statistic.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 929 articles, ten were included for quantitative analysis. Selected studies included 1974 patients (681 in the AC group, 1293 in the GA group). No significant differences were seen between GA and AC groups in terms of extent of resection (MD: 3.77, p = 0.38, I2 = 91 %), rates of gross total resection (OR: 1.20, p = 0.69, I2 = 74 %), OR time (MD: 5.96, p = 0.15, I2 = 0 %), or length of stay (MD: −3.39, p = 0.21, I2 = 92 %).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>AC is not inferior to surgery under GA for extent of resection of intra-axial brain tumors, with comparable rates of GTR and EOR. While non-significant, current data trends towards shorter operating time and length of stay as well for AC group patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38138,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary Neurosurgery: Advanced Techniques and Case Management","volume":"40 ","pages":"Article 102007"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary Neurosurgery: Advanced Techniques and Case Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214751925000192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Awake craniotomy (AC) for intra-axial brain tumors is useful for preserving cortical and subcortical white matter tracts that may have tumor invasion. No specific guideline or concrete evidence exists regarding the superiority of AC over surgery under general anesthesia (GA), with many surgeons preferring resection under GA for benefits of potentially better extent of resection.
Methods
A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and registered on PROSPERO(CRD42022311131). A comprehensive search was conducted using specific keywords and MeSH terms with Boolean operators, from PubMED and Cochrane databases. Pooled effect size was estimated using a Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model, with evaluation of heterogeneity using Higgins I2 statistic.
Results
Of 929 articles, ten were included for quantitative analysis. Selected studies included 1974 patients (681 in the AC group, 1293 in the GA group). No significant differences were seen between GA and AC groups in terms of extent of resection (MD: 3.77, p = 0.38, I2 = 91 %), rates of gross total resection (OR: 1.20, p = 0.69, I2 = 74 %), OR time (MD: 5.96, p = 0.15, I2 = 0 %), or length of stay (MD: −3.39, p = 0.21, I2 = 92 %).
Conclusion
AC is not inferior to surgery under GA for extent of resection of intra-axial brain tumors, with comparable rates of GTR and EOR. While non-significant, current data trends towards shorter operating time and length of stay as well for AC group patients.