A proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) and spectral proper orthogonal decomposition (SPOD) study on the effects of different momentum ratios and Reynolds number in a T-junction with an upstream elbow

Q1 Chemical Engineering
Y.H. Wong, Y. Duan, L. Lampunio, M.D. Eaton, M.J. Bluck
{"title":"A proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) and spectral proper orthogonal decomposition (SPOD) study on the effects of different momentum ratios and Reynolds number in a T-junction with an upstream elbow","authors":"Y.H. Wong,&nbsp;Y. Duan,&nbsp;L. Lampunio,&nbsp;M.D. Eaton,&nbsp;M.J. Bluck","doi":"10.1016/j.ijft.2025.101170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>T-junctions are critical components within the primary circuit of pressurised water reactors (PWRs). They connect the pressuriser (PRZ), with the steam generator (SG), and the reactor pressure vessel (RPV). As such, it is crucial to have a mechanistic understanding of the turbulent fluid flow and thermal mixing within such T-junctions. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) studies of flows within T-junctions usually involve understanding the effects of variations in momentum and Reynolds numbers on the turbulent flow structures and thermal mixing phenomena. In this paper, we utilise proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) and spectral proper orthogonal decomposition (SPOD) methods to analyse the complex flow structures arising from various test cases for a PWR T-junction with an upstream elbow.</div><div>The first aim is to compare the flow structures resulting from different momentum ratios and/or Reynolds numbers of the inlet branch flow to identify the dominant factor. These parameters are adjusted by varying the branch pipe diameter and inlet branch velocity. The final aim is to compare flow structures obtained using POD and SPOD analysis. While both methods produce explicable patterns, they reveal vastly different structures that can be interpreted differently.</div><div>Momentum ratios have traditionally guided engineering design optimization. Our findings indicate that altering the Reynolds number of the inlet branch flow can help avoid turbulent flow structures that may compromise the structural integrity of nuclear components in NPPs. While POD is widely used for fluid flow analysis, SPOD offers a more detailed examination of turbulent fluid flow structures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36341,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Thermofluids","volume":"27 ","pages":"Article 101170"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Thermofluids","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266620272500117X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Chemical Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

T-junctions are critical components within the primary circuit of pressurised water reactors (PWRs). They connect the pressuriser (PRZ), with the steam generator (SG), and the reactor pressure vessel (RPV). As such, it is crucial to have a mechanistic understanding of the turbulent fluid flow and thermal mixing within such T-junctions. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) studies of flows within T-junctions usually involve understanding the effects of variations in momentum and Reynolds numbers on the turbulent flow structures and thermal mixing phenomena. In this paper, we utilise proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) and spectral proper orthogonal decomposition (SPOD) methods to analyse the complex flow structures arising from various test cases for a PWR T-junction with an upstream elbow.
The first aim is to compare the flow structures resulting from different momentum ratios and/or Reynolds numbers of the inlet branch flow to identify the dominant factor. These parameters are adjusted by varying the branch pipe diameter and inlet branch velocity. The final aim is to compare flow structures obtained using POD and SPOD analysis. While both methods produce explicable patterns, they reveal vastly different structures that can be interpreted differently.
Momentum ratios have traditionally guided engineering design optimization. Our findings indicate that altering the Reynolds number of the inlet branch flow can help avoid turbulent flow structures that may compromise the structural integrity of nuclear components in NPPs. While POD is widely used for fluid flow analysis, SPOD offers a more detailed examination of turbulent fluid flow structures.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Thermofluids
International Journal of Thermofluids Engineering-Mechanical Engineering
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
111
审稿时长
66 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信