Lei Zheng , Chao Tan , Jiqing Li , Jing Huang , Xiaohong Chen , Feng Xiao , Bikui Zhao
{"title":"Quantitative analysis framework for the benefit-risk feedback system of watershed reservoir groups","authors":"Lei Zheng , Chao Tan , Jiqing Li , Jing Huang , Xiaohong Chen , Feng Xiao , Bikui Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.watres.2025.123342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The dynamic nature of environmental changes poses significant challenges to watershed management, particularly when there is a lack of objective methodologies for evaluating multiple scenarios within simulations. This deficiency often leads to an inadequate understanding of the benefits and risks associated with reservoir operations, thereby hindering the formulation of scientific decisions. To address the above issues, we have improved the conditional value at risk (ICVaR) and proposed a novel quantitative framework for assessing the complex interplay between benefits and risks. This framework is further enhanced by integrating with the panel vector auto-regression (PVAR), providing a more comprehensive approach to decision-making. Taking the Wudongde, Baihetan, Xiluodu, and Xiangjiaba reservoirs in the lower Jinsha River—collectively known as the Jinxia Reservoir Group—as case studies, a multi-objective optimization operational model is designed to effectively integrate flood control with power generation objectives. The analysis reveals that the flood control and economic operation of the Jinxia Reservoir Group exhibit consistency when encountering floods of design frequency <em>P</em> ≥ 1%. Their competition for the flood-carrying capacity exceeds that for water resources. It is recommended that the focus of joint operation should shift from optimizing water resource allocation to reservoir storage capacity. In terms of universally applicable methodologies, the ICVaR is capable of retaining data fluctuations, effectively leveraging both tail risk and front benefit data. This approach significantly diminishes the evaluation error of operational schemes from 50.16% to below 5%. The quantitative analysis framework adeptly addresses the issue of spurious regression in evaluation indicators, clarifies the feedback response relationship between reservoirs and operational demands, empowers managers to identify key operational nodes and vulnerable links, and facilitates the development of adaptive regulation mechanisms. The findings of this study contribute to evaluating and managing the operational benefits and risks of reservoir groups.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":443,"journal":{"name":"Water Research","volume":"280 ","pages":"Article 123342"},"PeriodicalIF":11.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0043135425002556","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The dynamic nature of environmental changes poses significant challenges to watershed management, particularly when there is a lack of objective methodologies for evaluating multiple scenarios within simulations. This deficiency often leads to an inadequate understanding of the benefits and risks associated with reservoir operations, thereby hindering the formulation of scientific decisions. To address the above issues, we have improved the conditional value at risk (ICVaR) and proposed a novel quantitative framework for assessing the complex interplay between benefits and risks. This framework is further enhanced by integrating with the panel vector auto-regression (PVAR), providing a more comprehensive approach to decision-making. Taking the Wudongde, Baihetan, Xiluodu, and Xiangjiaba reservoirs in the lower Jinsha River—collectively known as the Jinxia Reservoir Group—as case studies, a multi-objective optimization operational model is designed to effectively integrate flood control with power generation objectives. The analysis reveals that the flood control and economic operation of the Jinxia Reservoir Group exhibit consistency when encountering floods of design frequency P ≥ 1%. Their competition for the flood-carrying capacity exceeds that for water resources. It is recommended that the focus of joint operation should shift from optimizing water resource allocation to reservoir storage capacity. In terms of universally applicable methodologies, the ICVaR is capable of retaining data fluctuations, effectively leveraging both tail risk and front benefit data. This approach significantly diminishes the evaluation error of operational schemes from 50.16% to below 5%. The quantitative analysis framework adeptly addresses the issue of spurious regression in evaluation indicators, clarifies the feedback response relationship between reservoirs and operational demands, empowers managers to identify key operational nodes and vulnerable links, and facilitates the development of adaptive regulation mechanisms. The findings of this study contribute to evaluating and managing the operational benefits and risks of reservoir groups.
期刊介绍:
Water Research, along with its open access companion journal Water Research X, serves as a platform for publishing original research papers covering various aspects of the science and technology related to the anthropogenic water cycle, water quality, and its management worldwide. The audience targeted by the journal comprises biologists, chemical engineers, chemists, civil engineers, environmental engineers, limnologists, and microbiologists. The scope of the journal include:
•Treatment processes for water and wastewaters (municipal, agricultural, industrial, and on-site treatment), including resource recovery and residuals management;
•Urban hydrology including sewer systems, stormwater management, and green infrastructure;
•Drinking water treatment and distribution;
•Potable and non-potable water reuse;
•Sanitation, public health, and risk assessment;
•Anaerobic digestion, solid and hazardous waste management, including source characterization and the effects and control of leachates and gaseous emissions;
•Contaminants (chemical, microbial, anthropogenic particles such as nanoparticles or microplastics) and related water quality sensing, monitoring, fate, and assessment;
•Anthropogenic impacts on inland, tidal, coastal and urban waters, focusing on surface and ground waters, and point and non-point sources of pollution;
•Environmental restoration, linked to surface water, groundwater and groundwater remediation;
•Analysis of the interfaces between sediments and water, and between water and atmosphere, focusing specifically on anthropogenic impacts;
•Mathematical modelling, systems analysis, machine learning, and beneficial use of big data related to the anthropogenic water cycle;
•Socio-economic, policy, and regulations studies.