Charles Hulme, Gillian West, Mariela Rios Diaz, Sarah Hearne, Caroline Korell, Mihaela Duta, Margaret J. Snowling
{"title":"The Nuffield Early Language Intervention (NELI) programme is associated with lasting improvements in children's language and reading skills","authors":"Charles Hulme, Gillian West, Mariela Rios Diaz, Sarah Hearne, Caroline Korell, Mihaela Duta, Margaret J. Snowling","doi":"10.1111/jcpp.14157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundOral language skills are a critical foundation for education and psychosocial development. Learning to read, in particular, depends heavily on oral language skills. The Nuffield Early Language Intervention (NELI) has been shown to improve the language of 4–5‐year‐old children entering school with language weaknesses in four robust trials. To date, however, there is limited evidence on the durability of the gains produced by the intervention, and some have argued that the effects of such educational interventions typically fade‐out quite rapidly.MethodsA large‐scale effectiveness trial of the NELI intervention implemented under real‐world conditions produced educationally meaningful improvements in children's language and reading abilities. Here, we report follow‐up testing of children from this study conducted approximately 2 years after the completion of the intervention.ResultsAt 2‐year follow‐up, children who had received NELI had better oral language (<jats:italic>d</jats:italic> = 0.22 or <jats:italic>d</jats:italic> = 0.33 for children with lower language ability), reading comprehension (<jats:italic>d</jats:italic> = 0.16 or <jats:italic>d</jats:italic> = 0.24 for children with lower language ability) and single‐word reading skills (<jats:italic>d</jats:italic> = 0.16 or <jats:italic>d</jats:italic> = 0.22 for children with lower language ability) than the control group.ConclusionsOur data show that, although fade‐out effects are common in educational research, a widely used language intervention produces durable improvements in language and reading skills, with educationally important effect sizes. These findings have important theoretical and practical implications.","PeriodicalId":187,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry","volume":"73 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.14157","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BackgroundOral language skills are a critical foundation for education and psychosocial development. Learning to read, in particular, depends heavily on oral language skills. The Nuffield Early Language Intervention (NELI) has been shown to improve the language of 4–5‐year‐old children entering school with language weaknesses in four robust trials. To date, however, there is limited evidence on the durability of the gains produced by the intervention, and some have argued that the effects of such educational interventions typically fade‐out quite rapidly.MethodsA large‐scale effectiveness trial of the NELI intervention implemented under real‐world conditions produced educationally meaningful improvements in children's language and reading abilities. Here, we report follow‐up testing of children from this study conducted approximately 2 years after the completion of the intervention.ResultsAt 2‐year follow‐up, children who had received NELI had better oral language (d = 0.22 or d = 0.33 for children with lower language ability), reading comprehension (d = 0.16 or d = 0.24 for children with lower language ability) and single‐word reading skills (d = 0.16 or d = 0.22 for children with lower language ability) than the control group.ConclusionsOur data show that, although fade‐out effects are common in educational research, a widely used language intervention produces durable improvements in language and reading skills, with educationally important effect sizes. These findings have important theoretical and practical implications.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (JCPP) is a highly regarded international publication that focuses on the fields of child and adolescent psychology and psychiatry. It is recognized for publishing top-tier, clinically relevant research across various disciplines related to these areas. JCPP has a broad global readership and covers a diverse range of topics, including:
Epidemiology: Studies on the prevalence and distribution of mental health issues in children and adolescents.
Diagnosis: Research on the identification and classification of childhood disorders.
Treatments: Psychotherapeutic and psychopharmacological interventions for child and adolescent mental health.
Behavior and Cognition: Studies on the behavioral and cognitive aspects of childhood disorders.
Neuroscience and Neurobiology: Research on the neural and biological underpinnings of child mental health.
Genetics: Genetic factors contributing to the development of childhood disorders.
JCPP serves as a platform for integrating empirical research, clinical studies, and high-quality reviews from diverse perspectives, theoretical viewpoints, and disciplines. This interdisciplinary approach is a key feature of the journal, as it fosters a comprehensive understanding of child and adolescent mental health.
The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry is published 12 times a year and is affiliated with the Association for Child and Adolescent Mental Health (ACAMH), which supports the journal's mission to advance knowledge and practice in the field of child and adolescent mental health.