Daniel M Vu, Patrice J Persad, Adam L Rothman, William J Feuer, Ta C Chang
{"title":"A Single-Center Case-Control Study of Glaucoma Severity on Initial Presentation in Haitian Americans.","authors":"Daniel M Vu, Patrice J Persad, Adam L Rothman, William J Feuer, Ta C Chang","doi":"10.2147/OPTH.S512309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess relative glaucoma severity between Haitians and non-Haitians upon presentation to a tertiary referral practice using a retrospective case-control design.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>All Haitian descent patients were age- and zip code-matched with non-Haitian Hispanic American controls from a tertiary glaucoma service in a 1:1 ratio. Clinical and social vulnerability characteristics were analyzed for differences in functional and structural glaucoma deficits. Those who did not return after 1 year were considered lost to follow-up. Outcome measures included a comparison of blindness, glaucoma severity [visual field and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) loss], and follow-up rates between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At presentation, 95 Haitians had worse average mean deviation (MD) than controls in the better (-9.4 ± 9.8 vs -5.1 ± 6.4 dB, p < 0.02) and worse eyes (-12.7 ± 10.0 vs -7.3 ± 7.0 dB, p < 0.01). Haitians also had a greater percentage of functional blindness (22.4% vs 4.1%, p < 0.02) in the worse eye. RNFL thickness and loss to follow-up were similar between groups. Haitians were also less likely to have had a glaucoma surgery or laser prior to presentation than controls (p ≤ 0.009). In multivariable models, Haitian descent was associated with worse MD in the worse eye. Worse neighborhood area deprivation indices were associated with higher likelihood of loss to follow-up, but Haitian descent was not.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Haitians had greater vision loss than controls despite similar exam findings. Higher burden of blindness and fewer prior procedures upon presentation may indicate a care disparity. Haitian patients may benefit from greater surveillance or earlier treatment for glaucoma.</p>","PeriodicalId":93945,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","volume":"19 ","pages":"773-783"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11895674/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S512309","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To assess relative glaucoma severity between Haitians and non-Haitians upon presentation to a tertiary referral practice using a retrospective case-control design.
Patients and methods: All Haitian descent patients were age- and zip code-matched with non-Haitian Hispanic American controls from a tertiary glaucoma service in a 1:1 ratio. Clinical and social vulnerability characteristics were analyzed for differences in functional and structural glaucoma deficits. Those who did not return after 1 year were considered lost to follow-up. Outcome measures included a comparison of blindness, glaucoma severity [visual field and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) loss], and follow-up rates between groups.
Results: At presentation, 95 Haitians had worse average mean deviation (MD) than controls in the better (-9.4 ± 9.8 vs -5.1 ± 6.4 dB, p < 0.02) and worse eyes (-12.7 ± 10.0 vs -7.3 ± 7.0 dB, p < 0.01). Haitians also had a greater percentage of functional blindness (22.4% vs 4.1%, p < 0.02) in the worse eye. RNFL thickness and loss to follow-up were similar between groups. Haitians were also less likely to have had a glaucoma surgery or laser prior to presentation than controls (p ≤ 0.009). In multivariable models, Haitian descent was associated with worse MD in the worse eye. Worse neighborhood area deprivation indices were associated with higher likelihood of loss to follow-up, but Haitian descent was not.
Conclusion: Haitians had greater vision loss than controls despite similar exam findings. Higher burden of blindness and fewer prior procedures upon presentation may indicate a care disparity. Haitian patients may benefit from greater surveillance or earlier treatment for glaucoma.
目的:采用回顾性病例对照设计,评估海地人和非海地人在三级转诊实践中的相对青光眼严重程度。患者和方法:所有海地后裔患者的年龄和邮政编码与来自三期青光眼服务的非海地西班牙裔美国人对照按1:1的比例匹配。分析功能性和结构性青光眼缺陷患者的临床和社会脆弱性特征。1年后未返回的患者被认为没有随访。结果测量包括失明、青光眼严重程度[视野和视网膜神经纤维层(RNFL)丧失]和组间随访率的比较。结果:95名海地人在视力较好(-9.4±9.8 vs -5.1±6.4 dB, p < 0.02)和视力较差(-12.7±10.0 vs -7.3±7.0 dB, p < 0.01)时的平均偏差(MD)较对照组差。海地人在较差的眼睛中也有较大比例的功能性失明(22.4% vs 4.1%, p < 0.02)。两组间RNFL厚度和随访损失相似。海地患者在发病前接受青光眼手术或激光治疗的可能性也低于对照组(p≤0.009)。在多变量模型中,海地血统与较差眼的较差MD相关。较差的邻里区域剥夺指数与较高的随访损失可能性相关,但海地血统与此无关。结论:尽管检查结果相似,但海地人的视力下降程度高于对照组。较高的失明负担和较少的就诊前手术可能表明护理差异。海地的青光眼患者可能受益于更严格的监测或更早的治疗。