Climate of Accountability, Respect, and Ethics Survey (CARES): development and validation of an organizational climate survey.

Frontiers in research metrics and analytics Pub Date : 2025-02-25 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frma.2025.1516726
Brian C Martinson, Jarvis Smallfield, Vicki J Magley, Carol R Thrush, C K Gunsalus
{"title":"Climate of Accountability, Respect, and Ethics Survey (CARES): development and validation of an organizational climate survey.","authors":"Brian C Martinson, Jarvis Smallfield, Vicki J Magley, Carol R Thrush, C K Gunsalus","doi":"10.3389/frma.2025.1516726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This research describes the development and validation of the CARES Climate Survey, a 22-item measure designed to assess interpersonal dimensions of work-unit climates. Dimensions of work-unit climates are identified through work-unit member perceptions and include civility, interpersonal accountability, conflict resolution, and institutional harassment responsiveness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two samples (<i>N</i> = 1,384; <i>N</i> = 868) of academic researchers, including one from the North American membership of the American Geophysical Union (AGU), and one from a large research-intensive university, responded to the CARES and additional measures via an online survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We demonstrate content validity of the CARES measure and confirm structural validity through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses which yielded four dimensions of interpersonal climate. In addition, we confirm the CARES internal reliability, construct validity, and excellent sub-group invariance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The CARES is a brief, psychometrically sound instrument that can be used by researchers, institutional leaders, and other practitioners to assess interpersonal climates in organizational work-units.</p><p><strong>Originality/value: </strong>This is the first study to develop and validate such a measure of interpersonal climates specifically in research-intensive organizations, using rigorous psychometric methods, grounded in both theory and prior research on work-unit climates.</p>","PeriodicalId":73104,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in research metrics and analytics","volume":"10 ","pages":"1516726"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11894455/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in research metrics and analytics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2025.1516726","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This research describes the development and validation of the CARES Climate Survey, a 22-item measure designed to assess interpersonal dimensions of work-unit climates. Dimensions of work-unit climates are identified through work-unit member perceptions and include civility, interpersonal accountability, conflict resolution, and institutional harassment responsiveness.

Methods: Two samples (N = 1,384; N = 868) of academic researchers, including one from the North American membership of the American Geophysical Union (AGU), and one from a large research-intensive university, responded to the CARES and additional measures via an online survey.

Results: We demonstrate content validity of the CARES measure and confirm structural validity through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses which yielded four dimensions of interpersonal climate. In addition, we confirm the CARES internal reliability, construct validity, and excellent sub-group invariance.

Conclusions: The CARES is a brief, psychometrically sound instrument that can be used by researchers, institutional leaders, and other practitioners to assess interpersonal climates in organizational work-units.

Originality/value: This is the first study to develop and validate such a measure of interpersonal climates specifically in research-intensive organizations, using rigorous psychometric methods, grounded in both theory and prior research on work-unit climates.

问责、尊重和道德氛围调查(CARES):组织氛围调查的发展和验证。
背景:本研究描述了CARES气候调查的发展和验证,这是一个22个项目的测量,旨在评估工作单位气候的人际维度。工作单位氛围的维度是通过工作单位成员的感知来确定的,包括文明、人际责任、冲突解决和机构骚扰响应。方法:2份样本(N = 1384;N = 868)的学术研究人员,其中一位来自美国地球物理联盟(AGU)的北美会员,一位来自大型研究密集型大学,通过在线调查对CARES和其他措施做出了回应。结果:通过探索性因子分析和验证性因子分析,我们验证了CARES量表的内容效度,并验证了其结构效度。此外,我们还证实了CARES的内部信度、结构效度和出色的子组不变性。结论:CARES是一个简短的、心理测量学上可靠的工具,可以被研究人员、机构领导者和其他实践者用来评估组织工作单位中的人际气候。原创性/价值:这是第一个专门在研究密集型组织中开发和验证这种人际气候测量的研究,使用严格的心理测量方法,以理论和先前对工作单位气候的研究为基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信