Assessment of fracture risk based on FRAX score and Polish guidelines in patients with newly diagnosed osteoporosis.

Wioletta Stępień-Kłos, Marta Michalska-Kasiczak, Katarzyna Płoszka, Michał Stuss, Ewa Sewerynek
{"title":"Assessment of fracture risk based on FRAX score and Polish guidelines in patients with newly diagnosed osteoporosis.","authors":"Wioletta Stępień-Kłos, Marta Michalska-Kasiczak, Katarzyna Płoszka, Michał Stuss, Ewa Sewerynek","doi":"10.5603/ep.102879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The authors of the latest recommendations state that osteoporosis diagnosis should not rely solely on densitometric (DXA) criteria. Fracture risk assessment is crucial for determining diagnosis and intervention thresholds. Comprehensive assessment of fracture risk requires consideration of bone mineral density (BMD) results, use of risk calculators like Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAXTM), and analysis of clinical and lifestyle factors. Experts highlight the need to identify patients at very high fracture risk to justify starting anabolic therapy. This retrospective study assessed fracture risk in newly diagnosed osteoporosis patients, identifying those at high and very high risk.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The study included 159 postmenopausal women with newly diagnosed osteoporosis, identified by a T-score of ≤ -2.5 standard deviations (SD) from DXA scans of the femoral neck and/or lumbar spine. Demographic data and laboratory tests were collected, and the 10-year fracture risk for major osteoporotic fractures (FRAX MOF) and hip fractures (FRAX HF) was calculated using the FRAX-PL calculator, which included femoral neck BMD. Each patient was then classified into a risk group based on modified fracture risk assessment criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study found that the most common risk factor for osteoporosis was a previous fracture (56.6%). Other common risk factors included smoking (21.38%), parental hip fracture (13.21%), and glucocorticoid use (10.70%). The FRAX calculator showed that 47.80% of patients were at very high risk for HF and 23.90% for MOF. A high HF risk was present in 10.06% of patients, and high MOF risk in 34.59%, whereas a medium and low MOF risk concerned 25.79% and 15.72% of the subjects, respectively. With expanded criteria, 72.33% of patients were classified at very high risk, compared to 23.90% for MOF and 47.80% for HF based solely on FRAX. Most patients met the T-score ≤ -3.0 SD criterion (52.20%) and FRAX > 15% for MOF or FRAX > 4.5% for HF (52.20%). Women aged 65-70 and 70-75 years are at the highest risk and qualify for anabolic therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study highlights the importance of stratifying patients by fracture risk, showing that more individuals are identified at very high risk when using the expanded assessment criteria from the latest Polish guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":93990,"journal":{"name":"Endokrynologia Polska","volume":"76 1","pages":"74-81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endokrynologia Polska","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/ep.102879","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The authors of the latest recommendations state that osteoporosis diagnosis should not rely solely on densitometric (DXA) criteria. Fracture risk assessment is crucial for determining diagnosis and intervention thresholds. Comprehensive assessment of fracture risk requires consideration of bone mineral density (BMD) results, use of risk calculators like Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAXTM), and analysis of clinical and lifestyle factors. Experts highlight the need to identify patients at very high fracture risk to justify starting anabolic therapy. This retrospective study assessed fracture risk in newly diagnosed osteoporosis patients, identifying those at high and very high risk.

Material and methods: The study included 159 postmenopausal women with newly diagnosed osteoporosis, identified by a T-score of ≤ -2.5 standard deviations (SD) from DXA scans of the femoral neck and/or lumbar spine. Demographic data and laboratory tests were collected, and the 10-year fracture risk for major osteoporotic fractures (FRAX MOF) and hip fractures (FRAX HF) was calculated using the FRAX-PL calculator, which included femoral neck BMD. Each patient was then classified into a risk group based on modified fracture risk assessment criteria.

Results: The study found that the most common risk factor for osteoporosis was a previous fracture (56.6%). Other common risk factors included smoking (21.38%), parental hip fracture (13.21%), and glucocorticoid use (10.70%). The FRAX calculator showed that 47.80% of patients were at very high risk for HF and 23.90% for MOF. A high HF risk was present in 10.06% of patients, and high MOF risk in 34.59%, whereas a medium and low MOF risk concerned 25.79% and 15.72% of the subjects, respectively. With expanded criteria, 72.33% of patients were classified at very high risk, compared to 23.90% for MOF and 47.80% for HF based solely on FRAX. Most patients met the T-score ≤ -3.0 SD criterion (52.20%) and FRAX > 15% for MOF or FRAX > 4.5% for HF (52.20%). Women aged 65-70 and 70-75 years are at the highest risk and qualify for anabolic therapy.

Conclusions: Our study highlights the importance of stratifying patients by fracture risk, showing that more individuals are identified at very high risk when using the expanded assessment criteria from the latest Polish guidelines.

基于FRAX评分和波兰指南的新诊断骨质疏松患者骨折风险评估
介绍:最新建议的作者指出,骨质疏松症的诊断不应该仅仅依赖于密度测量(DXA)标准。骨折风险评估对于确定诊断和干预阈值至关重要。综合评估骨折风险需要考虑骨矿物质密度(BMD)结果,使用骨折风险评估工具(FRAXTM)等风险计算器,并分析临床和生活方式因素。专家强调,需要识别骨折风险非常高的患者,以证明开始合成代谢治疗的合理性。这项回顾性研究评估了新诊断的骨质疏松症患者的骨折风险,确定了那些高风险和非常高风险的患者。材料和方法:该研究纳入159名新近诊断为骨质疏松症的绝经后妇女,通过股骨颈和/或腰椎DXA扫描的t评分≤-2.5标准差(SD)确定。收集人口统计学数据和实验室测试,使用FRAX- pl计算器计算包括股骨颈骨密度在内的主要骨质疏松性骨折(FRAX MOF)和髋部骨折(FRAX HF)的10年骨折风险。然后根据修改后的骨折风险评估标准将每位患者分为风险组。结果:研究发现骨质疏松最常见的危险因素是既往骨折(56.6%)。其他常见的危险因素包括吸烟(21.38%)、父母髋部骨折(13.21%)和使用糖皮质激素(10.70%)。FRAX计算器显示,47.80%的患者HF风险极高,23.90%的患者MOF风险极高。10.06%的患者存在高HF风险,34.59%的患者存在高MOF风险,而中度和低MOF风险分别为25.79%和15.72%。扩大标准后,72.33%的患者被归为非常高风险,而仅基于FRAX的MOF和HF分别为23.90%和47.80%。大多数患者符合t评分≤-3.0 SD标准(52.20%),MOF的FRAX >为15%,HF的FRAX >为4.5%(52.20%)。65-70岁和70-75岁的女性风险最高,适合进行合成代谢治疗。结论:我们的研究强调了根据骨折风险对患者进行分层的重要性,表明当使用最新波兰指南的扩展评估标准时,更多的个体被确定为高危人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信