[New systemic treatment approaches for conjunctival melanoma].

Florian T Steinberg, Michael Simon, Philomena A Wawer-Matos Reimer, Alexander C Rokohl, Ludwig M Heindl
{"title":"[New systemic treatment approaches for conjunctival melanoma].","authors":"Florian T Steinberg, Michael Simon, Philomena A Wawer-Matos Reimer, Alexander C Rokohl, Ludwig M Heindl","doi":"10.1007/s00347-025-02207-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Conjunctival melanoma is a rare disease that nevertheless has a high tumor-associated mortality rate. A resection in sano with adjuvant local treatment currently represents the therapeutic gold standard and systemic treatment is used for metastasized conjunctival melanoma and/or very advanced nonresectable local findings. New knowledge on molecular changes in conjunctival melanoma shows a clear similarity to those of cutaneous melanoma. Therefore, many findings on new systemic forms of treatment for cutaneous melanoma can be transferred to conjunctival melanoma. In the clinical application BRAF/MEK inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors are already in use and good response rates have been shown in small retrospective studies and case reports. Due to the rarity of conjunctival melanoma, there are no larger prospective studies comparing different systemic therapeutic agents. In a nonrandomized retrospective comparison, a better overall survival was shown for a combination of BRAF/MEK inhibitors (progression-free 1‑year survival probability of 54.7%; overall survival of 29.1 months) compared to a combination of PD1/CTLA4 antibodies (progression-free 1‑year survival probability of 42%; overall survival of 18 months). The current recommendation is to perform genomic profiling for every conjunctival melanoma, particularly to investigate a BRAF mutation. If a BRAF mutation is present, BRAF/MEK inhibitor treatment should preferably be initiated. Treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors can be used in the case of BRAF-negative mutation status or treatment failure with BRAF/MEK inhibitors. Monotherapy with the CTLA4 antibody ipilimumab is not recommended due to its inferiority to PD1 antibodies. New knowledge in the genomic profiling of conjunctival melanoma could enable further targeted treatment options in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":72808,"journal":{"name":"Die Ophthalmologie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Die Ophthalmologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-025-02207-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Conjunctival melanoma is a rare disease that nevertheless has a high tumor-associated mortality rate. A resection in sano with adjuvant local treatment currently represents the therapeutic gold standard and systemic treatment is used for metastasized conjunctival melanoma and/or very advanced nonresectable local findings. New knowledge on molecular changes in conjunctival melanoma shows a clear similarity to those of cutaneous melanoma. Therefore, many findings on new systemic forms of treatment for cutaneous melanoma can be transferred to conjunctival melanoma. In the clinical application BRAF/MEK inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors are already in use and good response rates have been shown in small retrospective studies and case reports. Due to the rarity of conjunctival melanoma, there are no larger prospective studies comparing different systemic therapeutic agents. In a nonrandomized retrospective comparison, a better overall survival was shown for a combination of BRAF/MEK inhibitors (progression-free 1‑year survival probability of 54.7%; overall survival of 29.1 months) compared to a combination of PD1/CTLA4 antibodies (progression-free 1‑year survival probability of 42%; overall survival of 18 months). The current recommendation is to perform genomic profiling for every conjunctival melanoma, particularly to investigate a BRAF mutation. If a BRAF mutation is present, BRAF/MEK inhibitor treatment should preferably be initiated. Treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors can be used in the case of BRAF-negative mutation status or treatment failure with BRAF/MEK inhibitors. Monotherapy with the CTLA4 antibody ipilimumab is not recommended due to its inferiority to PD1 antibodies. New knowledge in the genomic profiling of conjunctival melanoma could enable further targeted treatment options in the future.

结膜黑色素瘤的新系统治疗方法
结膜黑色素瘤是一种罕见的疾病,但有很高的肿瘤相关死亡率。目前,手术切除配合局部辅助治疗是治疗的金标准,而对于结膜黑色素瘤转移和/或非常晚期不可切除的局部病变,则采用全身治疗。结膜黑色素瘤分子变化的新知识显示其与皮肤黑色素瘤明显相似。因此,许多新的全身形式的皮肤黑色素瘤治疗的发现可以转移到结膜黑色素瘤。在临床应用中,BRAF/MEK抑制剂和免疫检查点抑制剂已经在使用,并且在小型回顾性研究和病例报告中显示出良好的反应率。由于结膜黑色素瘤的罕见性,目前还没有比较不同全身治疗药物的更大的前瞻性研究。在一项非随机回顾性比较中,BRAF/MEK抑制剂联合使用的总生存率更高(无进展1年生存率为54.7%;总生存期为29.1个月),与PD1/CTLA4抗体联合治疗相比(无进展1年生存率为42%;总生存期18个月)。目前的建议是对每个结膜黑色素瘤进行基因组分析,特别是调查BRAF突变。如果存在BRAF突变,最好开始BRAF/MEK抑制剂治疗。在BRAF阴性突变状态或BRAF/MEK抑制剂治疗失败的情况下,可使用免疫检查点抑制剂治疗。由于其对PD1抗体的劣性,不推荐使用CTLA4抗体易普利姆单抗进行单药治疗。结膜黑色素瘤基因组图谱的新知识可以在未来提供进一步的靶向治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信