Evaluation of Cochlear Basal Turn Patency in Children with Hearing Loss.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Marina Aramendi, Mariana Raviolo, Ina Sorge, Sylvia Meuret, Martin Sorge, Franz Wolfgang Hirsch, Daniel Gräfe
{"title":"Evaluation of Cochlear Basal Turn Patency in Children with Hearing Loss.","authors":"Marina Aramendi, Mariana Raviolo, Ina Sorge, Sylvia Meuret, Martin Sorge, Franz Wolfgang Hirsch, Daniel Gräfe","doi":"10.1007/s10162-025-00981-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>A patency at the cochlear basal turn (CBTP) can lead to an abrupt leakage of CSF, known as intraoperative CSF gusher. To date, there is no established technique for predicting an intraoperative CSF gusher. We aim to establish the prevalence, width and anatomical variation of CBTP in patients with and without hearing loss as well as to estimate its association between intraoperative CSF gusher.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of high-resolution CT images and medical records from 165 pediatric patients (330 ears) was conducted (57 males/108 females). Patients were grouped based on audiometry results: a hearing loss group and healthy controls. The presence and size of CBTP was assessed using multiplanar reconstruction techniques. The incidence of intraoperative CSF gusher was recorded and correlated with the width of CBTP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cochlear basal turn patency was found in 44.2% of ears without significant differences between both groups (p = 0.06). Intraoperative CSF gusher occurred in 5.1% of cases, more frequently in ears with inner ear malformations (27.3%). A CBTP larger than 0.75 mm did not predict intraoperative CSF gusher (p = 0.55). Enlarged vestibular aqueduct was significantly the more common malformation in patients with intraoperative CSF gusher (p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intraoperative CSF gusher highlights the need for reliable imaging predictors. Yet, CBTP alone does not predict this phenomenon, indicating other contributing factors beyond known imaging findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":56283,"journal":{"name":"Jaro-Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology","volume":" ","pages":"163-170"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11996723/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jaro-Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-025-00981-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: A patency at the cochlear basal turn (CBTP) can lead to an abrupt leakage of CSF, known as intraoperative CSF gusher. To date, there is no established technique for predicting an intraoperative CSF gusher. We aim to establish the prevalence, width and anatomical variation of CBTP in patients with and without hearing loss as well as to estimate its association between intraoperative CSF gusher.

Methods: A retrospective review of high-resolution CT images and medical records from 165 pediatric patients (330 ears) was conducted (57 males/108 females). Patients were grouped based on audiometry results: a hearing loss group and healthy controls. The presence and size of CBTP was assessed using multiplanar reconstruction techniques. The incidence of intraoperative CSF gusher was recorded and correlated with the width of CBTP.

Results: Cochlear basal turn patency was found in 44.2% of ears without significant differences between both groups (p = 0.06). Intraoperative CSF gusher occurred in 5.1% of cases, more frequently in ears with inner ear malformations (27.3%). A CBTP larger than 0.75 mm did not predict intraoperative CSF gusher (p = 0.55). Enlarged vestibular aqueduct was significantly the more common malformation in patients with intraoperative CSF gusher (p < 0.01).

Conclusion: Intraoperative CSF gusher highlights the need for reliable imaging predictors. Yet, CBTP alone does not predict this phenomenon, indicating other contributing factors beyond known imaging findings.

听力损失儿童耳蜗基底转通畅的评价。
目的:耳蜗基底转弯(CBTP)的通畅可导致脑脊液的突然泄漏,称为术中脑脊液喷涌。到目前为止,还没有确定的技术来预测术中脑脊液喷涌。我们的目的是建立CBTP在听力损失患者和非听力损失患者中的患病率、宽度和解剖变异,并估计其与术中脑脊液涌出的关系。方法:回顾性分析165例(330耳)儿童患者(男57例/女108例)的高分辨率CT图像和医疗记录。根据听力测量结果对患者进行分组:听力损失组和健康对照组。采用多平面重建技术评估CBTP的存在和大小。记录术中脑脊液涌流发生率,并与CBTP宽度相关。结果:44.2%耳蜗基底转通畅,两组比较差异无统计学意义(p = 0.06)。术中脑脊液喷涌发生率为5.1%,以内耳畸形多见(27.3%)。CBTP大于0.75 mm不能预测术中脑脊液涌出(p = 0.55)。术中脑脊液喷涌患者更常见的畸形是前庭导水管增大(p结论:术中脑脊液喷涌突出了可靠的影像学预测指标的必要性。然而,CBTP本身并不能预测这种现象,这表明除了已知的影像学发现之外,还有其他因素在起作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: JARO is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes research findings from disciplines related to otolaryngology and communications sciences, including hearing, balance, speech and voice. JARO welcomes submissions describing experimental research that investigates the mechanisms underlying problems of basic and/or clinical significance. Authors are encouraged to familiarize themselves with the kinds of papers carried by JARO by looking at past issues. Clinical case studies and pharmaceutical screens are not likely to be considered unless they reveal underlying mechanisms. Methods papers are not encouraged unless they include significant new findings as well. Reviews will be published at the discretion of the editorial board; consult the editor-in-chief before submitting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信