How to Design Electronic Case Report Form (eCRF) Questions to Maximize Semantic Interoperability in Clinical Research.

IF 1.9 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Eugenia Rinaldi, Caroline Stellmach, Sylvia Thun
{"title":"How to Design Electronic Case Report Form (eCRF) Questions to Maximize Semantic Interoperability in Clinical Research.","authors":"Eugenia Rinaldi, Caroline Stellmach, Sylvia Thun","doi":"10.2196/51598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong>Case report forms (CRFs) are the instruments used by research organizations worldwide to collect information about patients and study participants with the purpose of answering specific questions, assessing the efficacy and safety of medical products, and in general improving prevention and treatment in health care. To obtain significant research results out of the collected data, CRFs should be designed following the recommendations issued by regulatory authorities. However, we believe that semantic interoperability in CRFs has not yet been properly addressed. Within an international consortium comprising several COVID-19 cohorts, we scrutinized the questions included in the different CRFs with the purpose of establishing semantic interoperability across the different study data elements so that data could be merged and jointly analyzed. We realized that similar concepts were structured very differently across the different CRFs, making it hard to find and match the information. Based on the experience acquired, we developed 5 guiding principles on how to design CRFs to support semantic interoperability and increase data quality while also facilitating the sharing of data. Our aim in this viewpoint is to provide general suggestions that, in our opinion, should support researchers in designing CRFs. We conclude by urging authorities to establish an international coordination board for standards and interoperable clinical study data with competence in clinical data, interoperability standards, and data protection as part of a preparedness plan for future pandemics or other health threats.</p>","PeriodicalId":51757,"journal":{"name":"Interactive Journal of Medical Research","volume":"14 ","pages":"e51598"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11931322/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interactive Journal of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/51598","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Unlabelled: Case report forms (CRFs) are the instruments used by research organizations worldwide to collect information about patients and study participants with the purpose of answering specific questions, assessing the efficacy and safety of medical products, and in general improving prevention and treatment in health care. To obtain significant research results out of the collected data, CRFs should be designed following the recommendations issued by regulatory authorities. However, we believe that semantic interoperability in CRFs has not yet been properly addressed. Within an international consortium comprising several COVID-19 cohorts, we scrutinized the questions included in the different CRFs with the purpose of establishing semantic interoperability across the different study data elements so that data could be merged and jointly analyzed. We realized that similar concepts were structured very differently across the different CRFs, making it hard to find and match the information. Based on the experience acquired, we developed 5 guiding principles on how to design CRFs to support semantic interoperability and increase data quality while also facilitating the sharing of data. Our aim in this viewpoint is to provide general suggestions that, in our opinion, should support researchers in designing CRFs. We conclude by urging authorities to establish an international coordination board for standards and interoperable clinical study data with competence in clinical data, interoperability standards, and data protection as part of a preparedness plan for future pandemics or other health threats.

如何设计电子病例报告表(eCRF)问题以最大限度地提高临床研究中的语义互操作性。
无标签:病例报告表格(crf)是世界各地研究组织用来收集患者和研究参与者信息的工具,目的是回答具体问题,评估医疗产品的功效和安全性,并在总体上改进卫生保健中的预防和治疗。为了从收集的数据中获得重要的研究成果,应根据监管机构发布的建议设计crf。然而,我们认为crf中的语义互操作性还没有得到适当的解决。在一个由几个COVID-19队列组成的国际联盟中,我们仔细审查了不同CRFs中包含的问题,目的是在不同的研究数据元素之间建立语义互操作性,以便合并和联合分析数据。我们意识到,在不同的crf中,相似的概念的结构非常不同,这使得很难找到和匹配信息。根据获得的经验,我们制定了5条指导原则,指导如何设计crf以支持语义互操作性和提高数据质量,同时促进数据共享。在这个观点中,我们的目的是提供一般的建议,在我们看来,这些建议应该支持研究人员设计CRFs。最后,我们敦促有关当局建立一个国际标准和可互操作临床研究数据协调委员会,负责临床数据、互操作性标准和数据保护,作为应对未来流行病或其他健康威胁的准备计划的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Interactive Journal of Medical Research
Interactive Journal of Medical Research MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信