Beliefs and attitudes of family caregivers of People with dementia toward advance care planning: A Q methodology study.

JinShil Kim, KyungAh Cho, Yoon Young Hwang, Jung-Ah Lee, Sang Yi Baek, Jisun Yang, Yoonji Park, Seongkum Heo
{"title":"Beliefs and attitudes of family caregivers of People with dementia toward advance care planning: A Q methodology study.","authors":"JinShil Kim, KyungAh Cho, Yoon Young Hwang, Jung-Ah Lee, Sang Yi Baek, Jisun Yang, Yoonji Park, Seongkum Heo","doi":"10.1177/14713012251326463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Family caregivers' perspectives for advance care planning (ACP) are critically important to reflect the end-of-life wishes of people with dementia. Culture can influence ACP practice and people's perspectives toward it. Little is known about family caregivers' perspectives toward ACP in Asian countries, especially in Korea. <b>Purpose:</b> The purpose of this study was to explore beliefs and attitudes toward ACP among family caregivers of people with dementia. <b>Methodology:</b> Using a Q methodology, 28 statements (Q sample) were constructed through an extensive literature review to capture the beliefs and attitudes toward ACP in family caregivers. The P sample (25 family caregivers) completed each grid with a statement in Q sorting table. Data analysis was done using the PQ Method program (Ver. 2.35). <b>Results:</b> Three types emerged from 24 caregivers through a Varimax rotation and explained 53% of the total variance. One caregiver fell into a non-significant for any of the three types. Type 1 (<i>ACP benefit- and patient-caregiver wish-driven caregivers</i>) hold positive attitudes toward pre-care planning and the benefits but lack of respect for the preferences of people with dementia. Type 2 (<i>Well-dying- and dignity-pursued advocators</i>) recognized ACP as a dignity-preserving approach but had concerns about pre-care planning and felt the burden for management of people with dementia. Type 3 (<i>Patient autonomy supportive surrogates)</i> perceived the importance of respecting the preferences of people with dementia and the roles of family caregivers in ACP care. <b>Conclusions:</b> Differences in the perspectives toward ACP of family caregivers have emerged. It is crucial to develop tailored interventions for each type to optimize ACP care for people with dementia and implement them as early as possible after onset to reduce patient suffering and caregiver burden, enhance dignified death, and improve quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":72778,"journal":{"name":"Dementia (London, England)","volume":" ","pages":"14713012251326463"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dementia (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14713012251326463","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Family caregivers' perspectives for advance care planning (ACP) are critically important to reflect the end-of-life wishes of people with dementia. Culture can influence ACP practice and people's perspectives toward it. Little is known about family caregivers' perspectives toward ACP in Asian countries, especially in Korea. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore beliefs and attitudes toward ACP among family caregivers of people with dementia. Methodology: Using a Q methodology, 28 statements (Q sample) were constructed through an extensive literature review to capture the beliefs and attitudes toward ACP in family caregivers. The P sample (25 family caregivers) completed each grid with a statement in Q sorting table. Data analysis was done using the PQ Method program (Ver. 2.35). Results: Three types emerged from 24 caregivers through a Varimax rotation and explained 53% of the total variance. One caregiver fell into a non-significant for any of the three types. Type 1 (ACP benefit- and patient-caregiver wish-driven caregivers) hold positive attitudes toward pre-care planning and the benefits but lack of respect for the preferences of people with dementia. Type 2 (Well-dying- and dignity-pursued advocators) recognized ACP as a dignity-preserving approach but had concerns about pre-care planning and felt the burden for management of people with dementia. Type 3 (Patient autonomy supportive surrogates) perceived the importance of respecting the preferences of people with dementia and the roles of family caregivers in ACP care. Conclusions: Differences in the perspectives toward ACP of family caregivers have emerged. It is crucial to develop tailored interventions for each type to optimize ACP care for people with dementia and implement them as early as possible after onset to reduce patient suffering and caregiver burden, enhance dignified death, and improve quality of life.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信