Performance analysis of restraint systems for reclined occupant in side pole impact collisions.

IF 1.6 3区 工程技术 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Julio Abajo, Mónica Diez, Alberto Negro, Esteban Cañibano, Cristina Garcia
{"title":"Performance analysis of restraint systems for reclined occupant in side pole impact collisions.","authors":"Julio Abajo, Mónica Diez, Alberto Negro, Esteban Cañibano, Cristina Garcia","doi":"10.1080/15389588.2025.2471560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Safety restraint systems have enhanced occupants' safety in case of collision. However, they are designed to protect occupants in standard sitting posture and different sitting postures are not evaluated in current legal and rating tests. The goal of this study was to address the reclined posture under oblique pole side impact conditions. Different airbag systems were proposed and analyzed for protecting reclined occupants, providing a general overview of the restraint systems performance across these conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Simulations were performed with a subsystem Finite Elements (FE) vehicle model developed and validated against side impact tests. A reclined occupant position was analyzed using WorldSID 50th male dummy under Euro NCAP oblique pole side impact test conditions. Three different seat-mounted side restraint system solutions optimized according to standard EuroNCAP position were proposed to enhance reclined occupant safety. Additionally, three time-to-fire strategies were considered, a conventional time-to-fire and two pre-crash triggering that lead to an earlier deployment of the restraint systems.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the reclined posture, the conventional time of activation led to higher occupant injury values for all the restraint systems proposed. As the firing time was brought forward, the measured injury values were reduced. The double side airbag head + thorax-pelvis system with a pre-crash triggering (time-to-fire -5 ms) was predicted as the safest case scoring the higher overall rating and five Euro NCAP stars.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study investigated three side airbag systems capable of providing good protection under Euro NCAP oblique pole side impact conditions (upright posture), considering triggering times earlier than conventional in combination with optimized airbag design parameters, these systems were able to provide also adequate protection (4-5 stars) in reclined occupant positions. The results showed that the airbag inflation time is significant in reclined positions.</p>","PeriodicalId":54422,"journal":{"name":"Traffic Injury Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Traffic Injury Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2025.2471560","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Safety restraint systems have enhanced occupants' safety in case of collision. However, they are designed to protect occupants in standard sitting posture and different sitting postures are not evaluated in current legal and rating tests. The goal of this study was to address the reclined posture under oblique pole side impact conditions. Different airbag systems were proposed and analyzed for protecting reclined occupants, providing a general overview of the restraint systems performance across these conditions.

Methods: Simulations were performed with a subsystem Finite Elements (FE) vehicle model developed and validated against side impact tests. A reclined occupant position was analyzed using WorldSID 50th male dummy under Euro NCAP oblique pole side impact test conditions. Three different seat-mounted side restraint system solutions optimized according to standard EuroNCAP position were proposed to enhance reclined occupant safety. Additionally, three time-to-fire strategies were considered, a conventional time-to-fire and two pre-crash triggering that lead to an earlier deployment of the restraint systems.

Results: In the reclined posture, the conventional time of activation led to higher occupant injury values for all the restraint systems proposed. As the firing time was brought forward, the measured injury values were reduced. The double side airbag head + thorax-pelvis system with a pre-crash triggering (time-to-fire -5 ms) was predicted as the safest case scoring the higher overall rating and five Euro NCAP stars.

Conclusions: This study investigated three side airbag systems capable of providing good protection under Euro NCAP oblique pole side impact conditions (upright posture), considering triggering times earlier than conventional in combination with optimized airbag design parameters, these systems were able to provide also adequate protection (4-5 stars) in reclined occupant positions. The results showed that the airbag inflation time is significant in reclined positions.

侧杆碰撞中倾斜乘员约束系统的性能分析。
目的:安全约束系统提高了碰撞时乘员的安全性。然而,它们的设计是为了保护处于标准坐姿的乘员,而不同的坐姿在目前的法律和评级测试中没有得到评估。本研究的目的是解决斜杆侧碰撞条件下的倾斜姿势。提出并分析了不同的安全气囊系统,以保护倾斜的乘员,提供了在这些条件下约束系统性能的总体概述。方法:利用开发的子系统有限元(FE)车辆模型进行仿真,并对侧面碰撞试验进行验证。在欧洲NCAP斜极侧面碰撞试验条件下,使用WorldSID 50男性假人对倾斜坐姿进行了分析。根据eurooncap的标准位置,提出了三种不同的座椅侧约束系统优化方案,以提高乘客的平躺安全性。此外,研究人员还考虑了三种点火时间策略,一种是传统的点火时间策略,另一种是两种碰撞前触发策略,从而提前部署约束系统。结果:在仰卧姿势下,常规的激活时间导致所有约束系统的乘员伤害值更高。随着射击时间的延长,损伤测量值减小。双侧安全气囊头部+胸盆系统,碰撞前触发(发射时间-5毫秒)被预测为最安全的情况,获得更高的总体评级和5颗欧洲NCAP星。结论:本研究调查了三种能够在Euro NCAP斜杆侧面碰撞条件下(直立姿势)提供良好保护的侧气囊系统,考虑到比传统触发时间更早的触发时间,并结合优化的安全气囊设计参数,这些系统能够在倾斜的乘员位置上提供足够的保护(4-5星)。结果表明,在倾斜位置时,气囊充气时间显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Traffic Injury Prevention
Traffic Injury Prevention PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The purpose of Traffic Injury Prevention is to bridge the disciplines of medicine, engineering, public health and traffic safety in order to foster the science of traffic injury prevention. The archival journal focuses on research, interventions and evaluations within the areas of traffic safety, crash causation, injury prevention and treatment. General topics within the journal''s scope are driver behavior, road infrastructure, emerging crash avoidance technologies, crash and injury epidemiology, alcohol and drugs, impact injury biomechanics, vehicle crashworthiness, occupant restraints, pedestrian safety, evaluation of interventions, economic consequences and emergency and clinical care with specific application to traffic injury prevention. The journal includes full length papers, review articles, case studies, brief technical notes and commentaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信