Head Control and Upper-Body Coordination during Gait in Collegiate Contact and Noncontact Athletes.

IF 1.1 4区 心理学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Samuel R Zeff, Douglas N Martini, Joseph Hamill, Richard van Emmerik
{"title":"Head Control and Upper-Body Coordination during Gait in Collegiate Contact and Noncontact Athletes.","authors":"Samuel R Zeff, Douglas N Martini, Joseph Hamill, Richard van Emmerik","doi":"10.1080/00222895.2025.2474545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Persistent contact sport participation exposes athletes to repetitive head impacts, eliciting lingering motor performance alterations that could disrupt visual perception. We sought to compare head and trunk displacement, segmental coordination, and dynamic visual acuity between contact (ice hockey) and noncontact (baseball) athletes. Thirteen ice hockey and 11 baseball athletes walked at preferred and fast speeds during both a baseline and an imposed dynamic visual acuity (DVA) task. With increased visual task constraints and walking speeds, greater vertical head (preferred walking with visual task: 4.29 ± 0.48 vs 3.69 ± 0.71 cm, <i>p</i> = 0.030; fast baseline walking: 5.91 ± 0.59 vs 5.00 ± 0.97 cm, <i>p</i> = 0.019; fast walking with visual task: 5.72 ± 0.62 vs 4.86 ± 0.79 cm, <i>p</i> = 0.005) and trunk CoM displacement (fast baseline walking: 5.84 ± 0.61vs 5.00 ± 0.95 cm, <i>p</i> = 0.026; fast walking with visual task: 5.65 ± 0.63 vs 4.89 ± 0.78 cm, <i>p</i> = 0.014) were observed in contact athletes. In the transverse head-trunk coordination, contact athletes showed a decreased contribution of the head (9.85 ± 5.57 vs 19.36 ± 9.84%, <i>p</i> = 0.007) and increased trunk involvement (47.31 ± 21.43 vs 33.64 ± 10.79%, <i>p</i> = 0.030) compared to noncontact athletes, but this occurred only during fast walking with the DVA task. No DVA differences were observed (preferred speed: <i>p</i> = 0.650; fast speed: <i>p</i> = 0.820). While visual task performance was unaffected by contact sport status, the current results demonstrate changes in upper-body movement and how the head and trunk are coordinated in ice hockey athletes. Whether the observed upper-body movement and coordination changes due to repetitive head impact exposure result in decrements in visual perception and awareness in more challenging sporting environments remains unclear.</p>","PeriodicalId":50125,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Motor Behavior","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Motor Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2025.2474545","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Persistent contact sport participation exposes athletes to repetitive head impacts, eliciting lingering motor performance alterations that could disrupt visual perception. We sought to compare head and trunk displacement, segmental coordination, and dynamic visual acuity between contact (ice hockey) and noncontact (baseball) athletes. Thirteen ice hockey and 11 baseball athletes walked at preferred and fast speeds during both a baseline and an imposed dynamic visual acuity (DVA) task. With increased visual task constraints and walking speeds, greater vertical head (preferred walking with visual task: 4.29 ± 0.48 vs 3.69 ± 0.71 cm, p = 0.030; fast baseline walking: 5.91 ± 0.59 vs 5.00 ± 0.97 cm, p = 0.019; fast walking with visual task: 5.72 ± 0.62 vs 4.86 ± 0.79 cm, p = 0.005) and trunk CoM displacement (fast baseline walking: 5.84 ± 0.61vs 5.00 ± 0.95 cm, p = 0.026; fast walking with visual task: 5.65 ± 0.63 vs 4.89 ± 0.78 cm, p = 0.014) were observed in contact athletes. In the transverse head-trunk coordination, contact athletes showed a decreased contribution of the head (9.85 ± 5.57 vs 19.36 ± 9.84%, p = 0.007) and increased trunk involvement (47.31 ± 21.43 vs 33.64 ± 10.79%, p = 0.030) compared to noncontact athletes, but this occurred only during fast walking with the DVA task. No DVA differences were observed (preferred speed: p = 0.650; fast speed: p = 0.820). While visual task performance was unaffected by contact sport status, the current results demonstrate changes in upper-body movement and how the head and trunk are coordinated in ice hockey athletes. Whether the observed upper-body movement and coordination changes due to repetitive head impact exposure result in decrements in visual perception and awareness in more challenging sporting environments remains unclear.

大学接触和非接触运动员步态中的头部控制和上半身协调。
持续的接触性运动使运动员暴露在反复的头部撞击中,引起持续的运动表现改变,可能会破坏视觉感知。我们试图比较接触(冰球)和非接触(棒球)运动员的头部和躯干位移、节段协调性和动态视力。13名冰球运动员和11名棒球运动员在基线和强加的动态视觉敏锐度(DVA)任务中以首选和快速的速度行走。随着视觉任务约束和行走速度的增加,垂直头部增大(首选行走视觉任务:4.29±0.48 vs 3.69±0.71 cm, p = 0.030;快速基线步行:5.91±0.59 vs 5.00±0.97 cm, p = 0.019;有视觉任务的快走:5.72±0.62 vs 4.86±0.79 cm, p = 0.005)和躯干CoM位移(快走基线:5.84±0.61vs 5.00±0.95 cm, p = 0.026;接触运动员快走伴视觉任务:5.65±0.63 vs 4.89±0.78 cm, p = 0.014)。在横向头干协调方面,与非接触运动员相比,接触运动员的头部参与减少(9.85±5.57 vs 19.36±9.84%,p = 0.007),躯干参与增加(47.31±21.43 vs 33.64±10.79%,p = 0.030),但这种情况仅发生在DVA任务的快走中。未观察到DVA差异(首选速度:p = 0.650;速度快:p = 0.820)。虽然视觉任务的表现不受身体接触运动状态的影响,但目前的研究结果表明,冰球运动员的上半身运动以及头部和躯干的协调方式发生了变化。在更具挑战性的运动环境中,是否观察到由于重复头部撞击而引起的上半身运动和协调变化会导致视觉感知和意识的下降尚不清楚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Motor Behavior
Journal of Motor Behavior 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Motor Behavior, a multidisciplinary journal of movement neuroscience, publishes articles that contribute to a basic understanding of motor control. Articles from different disciplinary perspectives and levels of analysis are encouraged, including neurophysiological, biomechanical, electrophysiological, psychological, mathematical and physical, and clinical approaches. Applied studies are acceptable only to the extent that they provide a significant contribution to a basic issue in motor control. Of special interest to the journal are those articles that attempt to bridge insights from different disciplinary perspectives to infer processes underlying motor control. Those approaches may embrace postural, locomotive, and manipulative aspects of motor functions, as well as coordination of speech articulators and eye movements. Articles dealing with analytical techniques and mathematical modeling are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信