Fan therapy for breathlessness - how do you do it and why?

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Tim Luckett, Mary Roberts, Flavia Swan
{"title":"Fan therapy for breathlessness - how do you do it and why?","authors":"Tim Luckett, Mary Roberts, Flavia Swan","doi":"10.1097/SPC.0000000000000752","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of the review: </strong>This review summarises high-level evidence for fan therapy and adds a commentary on the relatively-neglected question of how to optimise benefits based on qualitative evidence, clinical experience and broader research and theory.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Recent high-level evidence suggests the fan reduces time to recovery from episodic breathlessness rather than reduces daily levels over a longer period. Lower grade evidence suggests the fan can also help people increase their physical activity. Experimental evidence for physiological mechanisms suggests that airflow reduces inspiratory neural drive and perceived unpleasantness through facial cooling of the trigeminal and olfactory nerves. Faster airflow elicits a stronger effect, with the optimal balance between efficacy and comfort proposed to be 2.85 metres per second. Research on clinician perspectives highlights the need for targeted strategies to drive fan implementation.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Fan therapy contributes to all three domains of the Breathing, Thinking, Functioning model of breathlessness management. Given it is affordable, portable, and has no known harms, the fan should be recommended as first-line therapy for anyone with breathlessness. Future research should evaluate how best to integrate fan therapy as a complex intervention alongside other strategies and supports.</p>","PeriodicalId":48837,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care","volume":" ","pages":"111-116"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPC.0000000000000752","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of the review: This review summarises high-level evidence for fan therapy and adds a commentary on the relatively-neglected question of how to optimise benefits based on qualitative evidence, clinical experience and broader research and theory.

Recent findings: Recent high-level evidence suggests the fan reduces time to recovery from episodic breathlessness rather than reduces daily levels over a longer period. Lower grade evidence suggests the fan can also help people increase their physical activity. Experimental evidence for physiological mechanisms suggests that airflow reduces inspiratory neural drive and perceived unpleasantness through facial cooling of the trigeminal and olfactory nerves. Faster airflow elicits a stronger effect, with the optimal balance between efficacy and comfort proposed to be 2.85 metres per second. Research on clinician perspectives highlights the need for targeted strategies to drive fan implementation.

Summary: Fan therapy contributes to all three domains of the Breathing, Thinking, Functioning model of breathlessness management. Given it is affordable, portable, and has no known harms, the fan should be recommended as first-line therapy for anyone with breathlessness. Future research should evaluate how best to integrate fan therapy as a complex intervention alongside other strategies and supports.

球迷治疗呼吸困难-你怎么做,为什么?
本综述的目的:本综述总结了扇疗法的高水平证据,并对如何基于定性证据、临床经验和更广泛的研究和理论优化益处这一相对被忽视的问题进行了评论。最近的发现:最近的高水平证据表明,风扇缩短了从间歇性呼吸困难中恢复的时间,而不是在较长一段时间内缩短了每天的呼吸水平。较低级别的证据表明,电扇还可以帮助人们增加体力活动。生理机制的实验证据表明,气流通过面部三叉神经和嗅觉神经的冷却来减少吸气神经驱动和感知的不愉快。更快的气流产生更强的效果,效率和舒适度之间的最佳平衡被提议为每秒2.85米。对临床医生观点的研究强调需要有针对性的策略来推动风扇的实施。总结:风扇治疗有助于呼吸,思考,功能模式呼吸困难管理的所有三个领域。考虑到它价格实惠,便携,并且没有已知的危害,应该推荐风扇作为呼吸困难患者的一线治疗方法。未来的研究应该评估如何最好地将粉丝疗法作为一种复杂的干预措施与其他策略和支持结合起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care
Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: A reader-friendly resource, Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care provides an up-to-date account of the most important advances in the field of supportive and palliative care. Each issue contains either two or three sections delivering a diverse and comprehensive coverage of all the key issues, including end-of-life management, gastrointestinal systems and respiratory problems. Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care is an indispensable journal for the busy clinician, researcher or student.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信