Workplace Violence Against Primary Care Physicians in Chengdu, China: A Cross-sectional Survey.

IF 3 Q1 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Xin Zeng, Chuan Zou, Hongxia Tao, Xueming Huang, Yu Lei, Chunyao Xiao, Tao Peng, Jing Shen, Wai Kit Wong
{"title":"Workplace Violence Against Primary Care Physicians in Chengdu, China: A Cross-sectional Survey.","authors":"Xin Zeng, Chuan Zou, Hongxia Tao, Xueming Huang, Yu Lei, Chunyao Xiao, Tao Peng, Jing Shen, Wai Kit Wong","doi":"10.1177/21501319251318837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this study is to examine workplace violence (WPV) toward primary care physicians (PCPs), including prevalence, associated factors, impacts, and response to WPV in Chengdu, China.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used an online cross-sectional design to collect data from October to November 2022 with a structured self-administered questionnaire from a purposive sample of 568 PCPs in Chengdu city.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 490 valid questionnaires, 44.3% of respondents reported at least encountered 1 type of WPV in the preceding year, with 38.0% experiencing emotional abuse, 24.5% threats, 9.8% experiencing physical assault, 5.5% verbal sexual harassment, and 1.6% sexual abuse. The common perpetrators of WPV were patients (81.6%) and their relatives (44.2%). A multilevel analysis showed that PCPs without night shift had lower odds of experiencing WPV (odds ratios [OR] = 0.461, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.299-0.700, <i>P</i> = .0004), while higher education levels were associated with increased odds (OR = 1.835, 95% CI = 1.126-3.005, <i>P</i> = .015). The common reasons of causing WPV perceived by PCPs were \"rejected unreasonable demands\" (81.6%), \"unmet the expectations\" (51.2%), and \"waiting too long\" (47.9%). In response to WPV, 80.6% of PCPs had communicated positively with patients, 61.8% informed superiors, and 23.5% called security guards/police officers, but still 10.6% took no action. Most respondents (82.9%) did not receive training on how to deal with WPV. After experiencing WPV, PCPs reported low work efficiency (56.2%), decreased patient trust (32.7%), and anxious feelings (32.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study revealed a moderate prevalence of violence against PCPs in primary care settings. Most PCPs lack coping strategies to handle WPV and suffer many negative effects. It is imperative that PCPs receive formal training in WPV management, and our study provides evidence to support such training programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":46723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Primary Care and Community Health","volume":"16 ","pages":"21501319251318837"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11905042/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Primary Care and Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21501319251318837","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study is to examine workplace violence (WPV) toward primary care physicians (PCPs), including prevalence, associated factors, impacts, and response to WPV in Chengdu, China.

Methods: We used an online cross-sectional design to collect data from October to November 2022 with a structured self-administered questionnaire from a purposive sample of 568 PCPs in Chengdu city.

Results: Among the 490 valid questionnaires, 44.3% of respondents reported at least encountered 1 type of WPV in the preceding year, with 38.0% experiencing emotional abuse, 24.5% threats, 9.8% experiencing physical assault, 5.5% verbal sexual harassment, and 1.6% sexual abuse. The common perpetrators of WPV were patients (81.6%) and their relatives (44.2%). A multilevel analysis showed that PCPs without night shift had lower odds of experiencing WPV (odds ratios [OR] = 0.461, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.299-0.700, P = .0004), while higher education levels were associated with increased odds (OR = 1.835, 95% CI = 1.126-3.005, P = .015). The common reasons of causing WPV perceived by PCPs were "rejected unreasonable demands" (81.6%), "unmet the expectations" (51.2%), and "waiting too long" (47.9%). In response to WPV, 80.6% of PCPs had communicated positively with patients, 61.8% informed superiors, and 23.5% called security guards/police officers, but still 10.6% took no action. Most respondents (82.9%) did not receive training on how to deal with WPV. After experiencing WPV, PCPs reported low work efficiency (56.2%), decreased patient trust (32.7%), and anxious feelings (32.7%).

Conclusions: This study revealed a moderate prevalence of violence against PCPs in primary care settings. Most PCPs lack coping strategies to handle WPV and suffer many negative effects. It is imperative that PCPs receive formal training in WPV management, and our study provides evidence to support such training programs.

中国成都初级保健医生的工作场所暴力:一项横断面调查。
背景:本研究的目的是调查中国成都初级保健医生(pcp)的工作场所暴力(WPV),包括患病率、相关因素、影响和对WPV的反应。方法:采用在线横断面设计,于2022年10月至11月对成都市568名pcp进行结构化自填问卷调查,收集数据。结果:在490份有效问卷中,44.3%的受访者表示在前一年至少遭遇过1种类型的家庭暴力,其中38.0%的人遭受过精神虐待,24.5%的人遭受过威胁,9.8%的人遭受过身体攻击,5.5%的人遭受过言语性骚扰,1.6%的人遭受过性虐待。WPV的常见肇事者为患者及其亲属(44.2%),占81.6%。一项多水平分析显示,没有夜班的pcp发生WPV的几率较低(比值比[OR] = 0.461, 95%可信区间[CI] = 0.299-0.700, P = 0.0004),而高等教育水平与WPV的几率增加相关(OR = 1.835, 95% CI = 1.126-3.005, P = 0.015)。pcp认为造成WPV的常见原因是“拒绝不合理的要求”(81.6%)、“未达到预期”(51.2%)和“等待时间太长”(47.9%)。针对WPV, 80.6%的pcp与患者积极沟通,61.8%的pcp告知上级,23.5%的pcp呼叫保安/警察,但仍有10.6%的pcp没有采取任何行动。大多数受访者(82.9%)没有接受过如何处理WPV的培训。经历WPV后,pcp报告工作效率低下(56.2%),患者信任度下降(32.7%),焦虑感(32.7%)。结论:本研究揭示了初级保健机构中针对pcp的暴力发生率中等。大多数pcp缺乏应对策略来处理WPV,并遭受许多负面影响。pcp必须接受WPV管理方面的正式培训,我们的研究提供了支持此类培训计划的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
183
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信