Communication preferences during the recovery phase of a hurricane disaster: Rural residents prefer face-to-face interaction.

Q3 Medicine
C Suzanne Lea, Hanna Beers
{"title":"Communication preferences during the recovery phase of a hurricane disaster: Rural residents prefer face-to-face interaction.","authors":"C Suzanne Lea, Hanna Beers","doi":"10.5055/jem.0887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The recovery phase of the emergency management cycle is understudied. This research aimed to understand the communication preferences of rural residents with low literacy during the recovery phase of a hurricane and flooding disaster.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>During October and November 2019, three focus groups (n = 32) were conducted with members of church congregations in three small townships in eastern North Carolina. Audio recordings were transcribed and coded for communication preferences and themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants were primarily non-White (62 percent), over age 55 (78 percent), and a majority (70 percent) had completed high school or less education. The primary communication preference for the recovery phase was face-to-face. Television (TV) was seen as an approach to disseminate dates and times for local in-person meetings and provide phone numbers to speak with a \"live\" person. Social media was not a dominant communication preference. Themes that emerged included the following: (1) governmental response related to repairs and buyout following past hurricanes has been too slow; (2) the elderly and those with low literacy seek in-person attention in their towns; (3) residents feel \"forgotten\" because resources are concentrated in the county seat.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Rural residents prefer face-to-face communication in the recovery phase. Multiple approaches to communication may be most effective to distribute recovery phase opportunities.</p>","PeriodicalId":38336,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Management","volume":"23 1","pages":"15-28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5055/jem.0887","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The recovery phase of the emergency management cycle is understudied. This research aimed to understand the communication preferences of rural residents with low literacy during the recovery phase of a hurricane and flooding disaster.

Methods: During October and November 2019, three focus groups (n = 32) were conducted with members of church congregations in three small townships in eastern North Carolina. Audio recordings were transcribed and coded for communication preferences and themes.

Results: Participants were primarily non-White (62 percent), over age 55 (78 percent), and a majority (70 percent) had completed high school or less education. The primary communication preference for the recovery phase was face-to-face. Television (TV) was seen as an approach to disseminate dates and times for local in-person meetings and provide phone numbers to speak with a "live" person. Social media was not a dominant communication preference. Themes that emerged included the following: (1) governmental response related to repairs and buyout following past hurricanes has been too slow; (2) the elderly and those with low literacy seek in-person attention in their towns; (3) residents feel "forgotten" because resources are concentrated in the county seat.

Conclusions: Rural residents prefer face-to-face communication in the recovery phase. Multiple approaches to communication may be most effective to distribute recovery phase opportunities.

飓风灾后恢复阶段的沟通偏好:农村居民更喜欢面对面的互动。
目的:对应急管理周期的恢复阶段进行了充分的研究。本研究旨在了解低识字率农村居民在灾后灾后恢复阶段的沟通偏好。方法:在2019年10月和11月期间,对北卡罗来纳州东部三个小城镇的教会成员进行了三个焦点小组(n = 32)。录音被转录和编码为通信偏好和主题。结果:参与者主要是非白人(62%),55岁以上(78%),大多数(70%)只完成高中或更低的教育。恢复阶段的主要沟通偏好是面对面。电视被视为传播当地面对面会议的日期和时间,并提供与“现场”人员交谈的电话号码的一种方法。社交媒体并不是主要的交流方式。出现的主题包括:(1)政府对过去飓风后的维修和买断的反应太慢;(2)老年人和文化水平较低的人在其所在城镇寻求面对面的关注;(3)资源集中在县城,居民有“被遗忘感”。结论:农村居民在恢复阶段更倾向于面对面交流。多种通信方法对于分配恢复阶段的机会可能是最有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Emergency Management
Journal of Emergency Management Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信