Enhancing Large Language Models with Retrieval-augmented Generation: A Radiology-specific Approach.

IF 8.1 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Dane A Weinert, Andreas M Rauschecker
{"title":"Enhancing Large Language Models with Retrieval-augmented Generation: A Radiology-specific Approach.","authors":"Dane A Weinert, Andreas M Rauschecker","doi":"10.1148/ryai.240313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>\"Just Accepted\" papers have undergone full peer review and have been accepted for publication in <i>Radiology: Artificial Intelligence</i>. This article will undergo copyediting, layout, and proof review before it is published in its final version. Please note that during production of the final copyedited article, errors may be discovered which could affect the content.</i> Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is a strategy to improve performance of large language models (LLMs) by providing the LLM with an updated corpus of knowledge that can be used for answer generation in real-time. RAG may improve LLM performance and clinical applicability in radiology by providing citable, up-to-date information without requiring model fine-tuning. In this retrospective study, a radiology-specific RAG was developed using a vector database of 3,689 <i>RadioGraphics</i> articles published from January 1999 to December 2023. Performance of 5 LLMs with and without RAG on a 192-question radiology examination was compared. RAG significantly improved examination scores for GPT-4 (81.2% versus 75.5%, <i>P</i> = .04) and Command R+ (70.3% versus 62.0%, <i>P</i> = .02), but not for Claude Opus, Mixtral, or Gemini 1.5 Pro. RAG-System performed significantly better than pure LLMs on a 24-question subset directly sourced from <i>RadioGraphics</i> (85% versus 76%, <i>P</i> = .03). The RAG-System retrieved 21/24 (87.5%, <i>P</i> < .001) relevant <i>RadioGraphics</i> references cited in the examination's answer explanations and successfully cited them in 18/21 (85.7%, <i>P</i> < .001) outputs. The results suggest that RAG is a promising approach to enhance LLM capabilities for radiology knowledge tasks, providing transparent, domain-specific information retrieval. ©RSNA, 2025.</p>","PeriodicalId":29787,"journal":{"name":"Radiology-Artificial Intelligence","volume":" ","pages":"e240313"},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology-Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1148/ryai.240313","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

"Just Accepted" papers have undergone full peer review and have been accepted for publication in Radiology: Artificial Intelligence. This article will undergo copyediting, layout, and proof review before it is published in its final version. Please note that during production of the final copyedited article, errors may be discovered which could affect the content. Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is a strategy to improve performance of large language models (LLMs) by providing the LLM with an updated corpus of knowledge that can be used for answer generation in real-time. RAG may improve LLM performance and clinical applicability in radiology by providing citable, up-to-date information without requiring model fine-tuning. In this retrospective study, a radiology-specific RAG was developed using a vector database of 3,689 RadioGraphics articles published from January 1999 to December 2023. Performance of 5 LLMs with and without RAG on a 192-question radiology examination was compared. RAG significantly improved examination scores for GPT-4 (81.2% versus 75.5%, P = .04) and Command R+ (70.3% versus 62.0%, P = .02), but not for Claude Opus, Mixtral, or Gemini 1.5 Pro. RAG-System performed significantly better than pure LLMs on a 24-question subset directly sourced from RadioGraphics (85% versus 76%, P = .03). The RAG-System retrieved 21/24 (87.5%, P < .001) relevant RadioGraphics references cited in the examination's answer explanations and successfully cited them in 18/21 (85.7%, P < .001) outputs. The results suggest that RAG is a promising approach to enhance LLM capabilities for radiology knowledge tasks, providing transparent, domain-specific information retrieval. ©RSNA, 2025.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.20
自引率
1.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Radiology: Artificial Intelligence is a bi-monthly publication that focuses on the emerging applications of machine learning and artificial intelligence in the field of imaging across various disciplines. This journal is available online and accepts multiple manuscript types, including Original Research, Technical Developments, Data Resources, Review articles, Editorials, Letters to the Editor and Replies, Special Reports, and AI in Brief.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信