[Association of glitazones and bladder cancer: a rapid review].

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Laila Schneidewind, Barbara Sommerhalder, Dario Willi, Cindy Rönnau, Annemarie Uhlig, Bernhard Kiss
{"title":"[Association of glitazones and bladder cancer: a rapid review].","authors":"Laila Schneidewind, Barbara Sommerhalder, Dario Willi, Cindy Rönnau, Annemarie Uhlig, Bernhard Kiss","doi":"10.1007/s00120-025-02557-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Since the authorization of glitazones as oral antidiabetics, there has been a controversial debate as to whether they increase the risk of bladder cancer or accelerate its progression. Recent data have shown that glitazones can upregulate the expression of Nectin4.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>These results make a renewed detailed examination of the topic unavoidable. Consequently, we conducted a rapid evidence analysis. The primarily aim was to identify systematic reviews investigating this relationship. Second, translational studies that describe the molecular biological background were identified.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A rapid evidence analysis was conducted with a literature search in MEDLINE via PubMed for the period July 2000 (first approval of glitazones in the European Union) to the date of the last search (15 July 2024).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The primary literature search yielded 860 hits and ultimately 14 studies were included. Of these, 6 were systematic reviews (5 including meta-analyses) and 8 were translational studies. In the reviews, the data situation regarding the association of glitazones with bladder cancer remains ambiguous, particularly due to the heterogeneity of the underlying studies and numerous confounding factors such as age or smoking history. Experimental evidence of a causal relationship between glitazones and bladder cancer could not be demonstrated. Two included studies even see a possible therapeutic benefit of the preparations in these patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It remains unclear whether glitazones play a relevant role in the development of bladder cancer. The possible therapeutic benefit should be urgently investigated further.</p>","PeriodicalId":29782,"journal":{"name":"Urologie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-025-02557-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Since the authorization of glitazones as oral antidiabetics, there has been a controversial debate as to whether they increase the risk of bladder cancer or accelerate its progression. Recent data have shown that glitazones can upregulate the expression of Nectin4.

Objectives: These results make a renewed detailed examination of the topic unavoidable. Consequently, we conducted a rapid evidence analysis. The primarily aim was to identify systematic reviews investigating this relationship. Second, translational studies that describe the molecular biological background were identified.

Materials and methods: A rapid evidence analysis was conducted with a literature search in MEDLINE via PubMed for the period July 2000 (first approval of glitazones in the European Union) to the date of the last search (15 July 2024).

Results: The primary literature search yielded 860 hits and ultimately 14 studies were included. Of these, 6 were systematic reviews (5 including meta-analyses) and 8 were translational studies. In the reviews, the data situation regarding the association of glitazones with bladder cancer remains ambiguous, particularly due to the heterogeneity of the underlying studies and numerous confounding factors such as age or smoking history. Experimental evidence of a causal relationship between glitazones and bladder cancer could not be demonstrated. Two included studies even see a possible therapeutic benefit of the preparations in these patients.

Conclusion: It remains unclear whether glitazones play a relevant role in the development of bladder cancer. The possible therapeutic benefit should be urgently investigated further.

[格列酮与膀胱癌的关系:快速回顾]。
背景:自从格列酮被批准作为口服抗糖尿病药物以来,关于它们是否会增加膀胱癌的风险或加速其进展一直存在争议。最近的研究表明,格列酮可以上调Nectin4的表达。目的:这些结果使一个新的详细检查的主题是不可避免的。因此,我们进行了快速的证据分析。主要目的是确定调查这种关系的系统综述。其次,确定了描述分子生物学背景的翻译研究。材料和方法:通过PubMed在MEDLINE上检索2000年7月(欧盟首次批准格列酮)至最后检索日期(2024年7月15日)的文献,进行快速证据分析。结果:初步文献检索得到860条,最终纳入14项研究。其中,6项是系统综述(5项包括荟萃分析),8项是转化研究。在综述中,关于格列酮与膀胱癌相关性的数据情况仍然不明确,特别是由于基础研究的异质性和许多混杂因素,如年龄或吸烟史。格列酮与膀胱癌之间因果关系的实验证据无法证明。两项纳入的研究甚至看到了这些制剂对这些患者可能的治疗益处。结论:格列酮是否在膀胱癌的发生发展中起相关作用尚不清楚。可能的治疗效果有待进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urologie
Urologie UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信