How do social norms influence the sexual and reproductive health of very young adolescents in sub-Saharan Africa? A scoping review protocol.

Q1 Medicine
Wellcome Open Research Pub Date : 2025-02-28 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.12688/wellcomeopenres.23139.2
Fardawsa Ahmed, Owen Nyamwanza, Alice N Ladur, Jermaine Dambi, Frances Cowan, Webster Mavhu
{"title":"How do social norms influence the sexual and reproductive health of very young adolescents in sub-Saharan Africa? A scoping review protocol.","authors":"Fardawsa Ahmed, Owen Nyamwanza, Alice N Ladur, Jermaine Dambi, Frances Cowan, Webster Mavhu","doi":"10.12688/wellcomeopenres.23139.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Introduction Very young adolescents (VYAs, aged 10-14 years) in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) have the worst sexual and reproductive health (SRH) outcomes of this age group worldwide due to structural, behavioural, socioeconomic and other factors. Social and gender norms have important consequences for the SRH and wellbeing of VYAs both now and over their life course. SRH programming often focuses on older adolescents (aged 15-19 years), overlooking younger ones. This scoping review sets out to explore how social and gender norms influence VYAs' SRH in SSA, in addition to exploring interventions that have been effective, to inform a context-specific intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We will employ the methodology developed by Arksey and O'Malley to review the available literature. We will search online databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, CINHAL, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, and African Index Medicus) for original studies published between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2024. Further, we will perform a manual search to include relevant grey literature. The steps in the review are: 1) defining the research question, 2) identifying relevant studies, 3) selecting studies, 4) charting the data, and 5) collating, summarising, and reporting the results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results We will report findings in accordance with the guidance provided in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols (PRISMA-P) statement. We will analyse and summarise data about study characteristics using descriptive statistics. We will use thematic analysis to analyse and summarise key themes and issues. We will triangulate quantitative and qualitative findings.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The review will map the breadth of studies focusing on social and gender norms, and SRH among VYAs, in addition to exploring interventions that have been effective. Findings will help us and others develop context-specific, bespoke interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":23677,"journal":{"name":"Wellcome Open Research","volume":"9 ","pages":"670"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11894366/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wellcome Open Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.23139.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Introduction Very young adolescents (VYAs, aged 10-14 years) in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) have the worst sexual and reproductive health (SRH) outcomes of this age group worldwide due to structural, behavioural, socioeconomic and other factors. Social and gender norms have important consequences for the SRH and wellbeing of VYAs both now and over their life course. SRH programming often focuses on older adolescents (aged 15-19 years), overlooking younger ones. This scoping review sets out to explore how social and gender norms influence VYAs' SRH in SSA, in addition to exploring interventions that have been effective, to inform a context-specific intervention.

Methods: We will employ the methodology developed by Arksey and O'Malley to review the available literature. We will search online databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, CINHAL, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, and African Index Medicus) for original studies published between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2024. Further, we will perform a manual search to include relevant grey literature. The steps in the review are: 1) defining the research question, 2) identifying relevant studies, 3) selecting studies, 4) charting the data, and 5) collating, summarising, and reporting the results.

Results: Results We will report findings in accordance with the guidance provided in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols (PRISMA-P) statement. We will analyse and summarise data about study characteristics using descriptive statistics. We will use thematic analysis to analyse and summarise key themes and issues. We will triangulate quantitative and qualitative findings.

Discussion: The review will map the breadth of studies focusing on social and gender norms, and SRH among VYAs, in addition to exploring interventions that have been effective. Findings will help us and others develop context-specific, bespoke interventions.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Wellcome Open Research
Wellcome Open Research Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all)
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
426
审稿时长
1 weeks
期刊介绍: Wellcome Open Research publishes scholarly articles reporting any basic scientific, translational and clinical research that has been funded (or co-funded) by Wellcome. Each publication must have at least one author who has been, or still is, a recipient of a Wellcome grant. Articles must be original (not duplications). All research, including clinical trials, systematic reviews, software tools, method articles, and many others, is welcome and will be published irrespective of the perceived level of interest or novelty; confirmatory and negative results, as well as null studies are all suitable. See the full list of article types here. All articles are published using a fully transparent, author-driven model: the authors are solely responsible for the content of their article. Invited peer review takes place openly after publication, and the authors play a crucial role in ensuring that the article is peer-reviewed by independent experts in a timely manner. Articles that pass peer review will be indexed in PubMed and elsewhere. Wellcome Open Research is an Open Research platform: all articles are published open access; the publishing and peer-review processes are fully transparent; and authors are asked to include detailed descriptions of methods and to provide full and easy access to source data underlying the results to improve reproducibility.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信